Use consistent guards for padlock code
The padlock feature is enabled if
```
defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_C) && defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86)
```
with the second macro coming from `padlock.h`. The availability of the
macro `MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_ALIGN16` is coincidentally equivalent to
`MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86` but this is not meaningful.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
diff --git a/library/aes.c b/library/aes.c
index 1f3d8ad..b4b3423 100644
--- a/library/aes.c
+++ b/library/aes.c
@@ -47,8 +47,7 @@
#if !defined(MBEDTLS_AES_ALT)
-#if defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_C) && \
- (defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86) || defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_ALIGN16))
+#if defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_C) && defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86)
static int aes_padlock_ace = -1;
#endif
@@ -530,7 +529,7 @@
#endif
ctx->rk_offset = 0;
-#if defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_C) && defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_ALIGN16)
+#if defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_C) && defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86)
if (aes_padlock_ace == -1) {
aes_padlock_ace = mbedtls_padlock_has_support(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_ACE);
}
@@ -642,7 +641,7 @@
mbedtls_aes_init(&cty);
ctx->rk_offset = 0;
-#if defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_C) && defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_ALIGN16)
+#if defined(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_C) && defined(MBEDTLS_HAVE_X86)
if (aes_padlock_ace == -1) {
aes_padlock_ace = mbedtls_padlock_has_support(MBEDTLS_PADLOCK_ACE);
}