Give a production-sounding name to the p256m option
Now that p256-m is officially a production feature and not just an example,
give it a more suitable name.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
diff --git a/3rdparty/CMakeLists.txt b/3rdparty/CMakeLists.txt
index 67db68d..14a4674 100644
--- a/3rdparty/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/3rdparty/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
execute_process(COMMAND ${MBEDTLS_PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../scripts/config.py -f ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../include/mbedtls/mbedtls_config.h get MBEDTLS_ECDH_VARIANT_EVEREST_ENABLED RESULT_VARIABLE everest_result)
-execute_process(COMMAND ${MBEDTLS_PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../scripts/config.py -f ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../include/mbedtls/mbedtls_config.h get MBEDTLS_P256M_EXAMPLE_DRIVER_ENABLED RESULT_VARIABLE p256m_result)
+execute_process(COMMAND ${MBEDTLS_PYTHON_EXECUTABLE} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../scripts/config.py -f ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../include/mbedtls/mbedtls_config.h get MBEDTLS_PSA_P256M_DRIVER_ENABLED RESULT_VARIABLE p256m_result)
if(${everest_result} EQUAL 0)
add_subdirectory(everest)