blob: d6d7b15301c775759a675b0978fd3c4d1b7eabf1 [file] [log] [blame]
Paul Beesley8aa05052019-03-07 15:47:15 +00001Firmware Design
2===============
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01003
4.. contents::
5
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00006Trusted Firmware-A (TF-A) implements a subset of the Trusted Board Boot
7Requirements (TBBR) Platform Design Document (PDD) [1]_ for Arm reference
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01008platforms. The TBB sequence starts when the platform is powered on and runs up
9to the stage where it hands-off control to firmware running in the normal
10world in DRAM. This is the cold boot path.
11
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000012TF-A also implements the Power State Coordination Interface PDD [2]_ as a
13runtime service. PSCI is the interface from normal world software to firmware
14implementing power management use-cases (for example, secondary CPU boot,
15hotplug and idle). Normal world software can access TF-A runtime services via
16the Arm SMC (Secure Monitor Call) instruction. The SMC instruction must be
17used as mandated by the SMC Calling Convention [3]_.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010018
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000019TF-A implements a framework for configuring and managing interrupts generated
20in either security state. The details of the interrupt management framework
21and its design can be found in TF-A Interrupt Management Design guide [4]_.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010022
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000023TF-A also implements a library for setting up and managing the translation
24tables. The details of this library can be found in `Xlat_tables design`_.
Antonio Nino Diaz6feb9e82017-05-23 11:49:22 +010025
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000026TF-A can be built to support either AArch64 or AArch32 execution state.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010027
28Cold boot
29---------
30
31The cold boot path starts when the platform is physically turned on. If
32``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU=0``, one of the CPUs released from reset is chosen as the
33primary CPU, and the remaining CPUs are considered secondary CPUs. The primary
34CPU is chosen through platform-specific means. The cold boot path is mainly
35executed by the primary CPU, other than essential CPU initialization executed by
36all CPUs. The secondary CPUs are kept in a safe platform-specific state until
37the primary CPU has performed enough initialization to boot them.
38
39Refer to the `Reset Design`_ for more information on the effect of the
40``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU`` platform build option.
41
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000042The cold boot path in this implementation of TF-A depends on the execution
43state. For AArch64, it is divided into five steps (in order of execution):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010044
45- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
46- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
47- Boot Loader stage 3-1 (BL31) *EL3 Runtime Software*
48- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *Secure-EL1 Payload* (optional)
49- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
50
51For AArch32, it is divided into four steps (in order of execution):
52
53- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
54- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
55- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *EL3 Runtime Software*
56- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
57
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000058Arm development platforms (Fixed Virtual Platforms (FVPs) and Juno) implement a
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010059combination of the following types of memory regions. Each bootloader stage uses
60one or more of these memory regions.
61
62- Regions accessible from both non-secure and secure states. For example,
63 non-trusted SRAM, ROM and DRAM.
64- Regions accessible from only the secure state. For example, trusted SRAM and
65 ROM. The FVPs also implement the trusted DRAM which is statically
66 configured. Additionally, the Base FVPs and Juno development platform
67 configure the TrustZone Controller (TZC) to create a region in the DRAM
68 which is accessible only from the secure state.
69
70The sections below provide the following details:
71
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +000072- dynamic configuration of Boot Loader stages
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010073- initialization and execution of the first three stages during cold boot
74- specification of the EL3 Runtime Software (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for
75 AArch32) entrypoint requirements for use by alternative Trusted Boot
76 Firmware in place of the provided BL1 and BL2
77
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +000078Dynamic Configuration during cold boot
79~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
80
81Each of the Boot Loader stages may be dynamically configured if required by the
82platform. The Boot Loader stage may optionally specify a firmware
83configuration file and/or hardware configuration file as listed below:
84
85- HW_CONFIG - The hardware configuration file. Can be shared by all Boot Loader
86 stages and also by the Normal World Rich OS.
87- TB_FW_CONFIG - Trusted Boot Firmware configuration file. Shared between BL1
88 and BL2.
89- SOC_FW_CONFIG - SoC Firmware configuration file. Used by BL31.
90- TOS_FW_CONFIG - Trusted OS Firmware configuration file. Used by Trusted OS
91 (BL32).
92- NT_FW_CONFIG - Non Trusted Firmware configuration file. Used by Non-trusted
93 firmware (BL33).
94
95The Arm development platforms use the Flattened Device Tree format for the
96dynamic configuration files.
97
98Each Boot Loader stage can pass up to 4 arguments via registers to the next
99stage. BL2 passes the list of the next images to execute to the *EL3 Runtime
100Software* (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32) via `arg0`. All the other
101arguments are platform defined. The Arm development platforms use the following
102convention:
103
104- BL1 passes the address of a meminfo_t structure to BL2 via ``arg1``. This
105 structure contains the memory layout available to BL2.
106- When dynamic configuration files are present, the firmware configuration for
107 the next Boot Loader stage is populated in the first available argument and
108 the generic hardware configuration is passed the next available argument.
109 For example,
110
111 - If TB_FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg0``
112 to BL2.
113 - If HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg2`` to
114 BL2. Note, ``arg1`` is already used for meminfo_t.
115 - If SOC_FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg1``
116 to BL31. Note, ``arg0`` is used to pass the list of executable images.
117 - Similarly, if HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1 or BL2, then its address is
118 passed in ``arg2`` to BL31.
119 - For other BL3x images, if the firmware configuration file is loaded by
120 BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` and if HW_CONFIG is loaded
121 then its address is passed in ``arg1``.
122
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100123BL1
124~~~
125
126This stage begins execution from the platform's reset vector at EL3. The reset
127address is platform dependent but it is usually located in a Trusted ROM area.
128The BL1 data section is copied to trusted SRAM at runtime.
129
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000130On the Arm development platforms, BL1 code starts execution from the reset
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100131vector defined by the constant ``BL1_RO_BASE``. The BL1 data section is copied
132to the top of trusted SRAM as defined by the constant ``BL1_RW_BASE``.
133
134The functionality implemented by this stage is as follows.
135
136Determination of boot path
137^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
138
139Whenever a CPU is released from reset, BL1 needs to distinguish between a warm
140boot and a cold boot. This is done using platform-specific mechanisms (see the
141``plat_get_my_entrypoint()`` function in the `Porting Guide`_). In the case of a
142warm boot, a CPU is expected to continue execution from a separate
143entrypoint. In the case of a cold boot, the secondary CPUs are placed in a safe
144platform-specific state (see the ``plat_secondary_cold_boot_setup()`` function in
145the `Porting Guide`_) while the primary CPU executes the remaining cold boot path
146as described in the following sections.
147
148This step only applies when ``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS=0``. Refer to the
149`Reset Design`_ for more information on the effect of the
150``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS`` platform build option.
151
152Architectural initialization
153^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
154
155BL1 performs minimal architectural initialization as follows.
156
157- Exception vectors
158
159 BL1 sets up simple exception vectors for both synchronous and asynchronous
160 exceptions. The default behavior upon receiving an exception is to populate
161 a status code in the general purpose register ``X0/R0`` and call the
162 ``plat_report_exception()`` function (see the `Porting Guide`_). The status
163 code is one of:
164
165 For AArch64:
166
167 ::
168
169 0x0 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
170 0x1 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
171 0x2 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
172 0x3 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
173 0x4 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
174 0x5 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
175 0x6 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
176 0x7 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
177 0x8 : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch64
178 0x9 : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
179 0xa : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
180 0xb : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch64
181 0xc : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch32
182 0xd : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
183 0xe : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
184 0xf : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch32
185
186 For AArch32:
187
188 ::
189
190 0x10 : User mode
191 0x11 : FIQ mode
192 0x12 : IRQ mode
193 0x13 : SVC mode
194 0x16 : Monitor mode
195 0x17 : Abort mode
196 0x1a : Hypervisor mode
197 0x1b : Undefined mode
198 0x1f : System mode
199
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000200 The ``plat_report_exception()`` implementation on the Arm FVP port programs
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100201 the Versatile Express System LED register in the following format to
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +0000202 indicate the occurrence of an unexpected exception:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100203
204 ::
205
206 SYS_LED[0] - Security state (Secure=0/Non-Secure=1)
207 SYS_LED[2:1] - Exception Level (EL3=0x3, EL2=0x2, EL1=0x1, EL0=0x0)
208 For AArch32 it is always 0x0
209 SYS_LED[7:3] - Exception Class (Sync/Async & origin). This is the value
210 of the status code
211
212 A write to the LED register reflects in the System LEDs (S6LED0..7) in the
213 CLCD window of the FVP.
214
215 BL1 does not expect to receive any exceptions other than the SMC exception.
216 For the latter, BL1 installs a simple stub. The stub expects to receive a
217 limited set of SMC types (determined by their function IDs in the general
218 purpose register ``X0/R0``):
219
220 - ``BL1_SMC_RUN_IMAGE``: This SMC is raised by BL2 to make BL1 pass control
221 to EL3 Runtime Software.
222 - All SMCs listed in section "BL1 SMC Interface" in the `Firmware Update`_
223 Design Guide are supported for AArch64 only. These SMCs are currently
224 not supported when BL1 is built for AArch32.
225
226 Any other SMC leads to an assertion failure.
227
228- CPU initialization
229
230 BL1 calls the ``reset_handler()`` function which in turn calls the CPU
231 specific reset handler function (see the section: "CPU specific operations
232 framework").
233
234- Control register setup (for AArch64)
235
236 - ``SCTLR_EL3``. Instruction cache is enabled by setting the ``SCTLR_EL3.I``
237 bit. Alignment and stack alignment checking is enabled by setting the
238 ``SCTLR_EL3.A`` and ``SCTLR_EL3.SA`` bits. Exception endianness is set to
239 little-endian by clearing the ``SCTLR_EL3.EE`` bit.
240
241 - ``SCR_EL3``. The register width of the next lower exception level is set
242 to AArch64 by setting the ``SCR.RW`` bit. The ``SCR.EA`` bit is set to trap
243 both External Aborts and SError Interrupts in EL3. The ``SCR.SIF`` bit is
244 also set to disable instruction fetches from Non-secure memory when in
245 secure state.
246
247 - ``CPTR_EL3``. Accesses to the ``CPACR_EL1`` register from EL1 or EL2, or the
248 ``CPTR_EL2`` register from EL2 are configured to not trap to EL3 by
249 clearing the ``CPTR_EL3.TCPAC`` bit. Access to the trace functionality is
250 configured not to trap to EL3 by clearing the ``CPTR_EL3.TTA`` bit.
251 Instructions that access the registers associated with Floating Point
252 and Advanced SIMD execution are configured to not trap to EL3 by
253 clearing the ``CPTR_EL3.TFP`` bit.
254
255 - ``DAIF``. The SError interrupt is enabled by clearing the SError interrupt
256 mask bit.
257
258 - ``MDCR_EL3``. The trap controls, ``MDCR_EL3.TDOSA``, ``MDCR_EL3.TDA`` and
259 ``MDCR_EL3.TPM``, are set so that accesses to the registers they control
260 do not trap to EL3. AArch64 Secure self-hosted debug is disabled by
261 setting the ``MDCR_EL3.SDD`` bit. Also ``MDCR_EL3.SPD32`` is set to
262 disable AArch32 Secure self-hosted privileged debug from S-EL1.
263
264- Control register setup (for AArch32)
265
266 - ``SCTLR``. Instruction cache is enabled by setting the ``SCTLR.I`` bit.
267 Alignment checking is enabled by setting the ``SCTLR.A`` bit.
268 Exception endianness is set to little-endian by clearing the
269 ``SCTLR.EE`` bit.
270
271 - ``SCR``. The ``SCR.SIF`` bit is set to disable instruction fetches from
272 Non-secure memory when in secure state.
273
274 - ``CPACR``. Allow execution of Advanced SIMD instructions at PL0 and PL1,
275 by clearing the ``CPACR.ASEDIS`` bit. Access to the trace functionality
276 is configured not to trap to undefined mode by clearing the
277 ``CPACR.TRCDIS`` bit.
278
279 - ``NSACR``. Enable non-secure access to Advanced SIMD functionality and
280 system register access to implemented trace registers.
281
282 - ``FPEXC``. Enable access to the Advanced SIMD and floating-point
283 functionality from all Exception levels.
284
285 - ``CPSR.A``. The Asynchronous data abort interrupt is enabled by clearing
286 the Asynchronous data abort interrupt mask bit.
287
288 - ``SDCR``. The ``SDCR.SPD`` field is set to disable AArch32 Secure
289 self-hosted privileged debug.
290
291Platform initialization
292^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
293
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000294On Arm platforms, BL1 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100295
296- Enable the Trusted Watchdog.
297- Initialize the console.
298- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
299- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
300- Configure any required platform storage to load the next bootloader image
301 (BL2).
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000302- If the BL1 dynamic configuration file, ``TB_FW_CONFIG``, is available, then
303 load it to the platform defined address and make it available to BL2 via
304 ``arg0``.
Soby Mathew3208edc2018-06-11 16:40:36 +0100305- Configure the system timer and program the `CNTFRQ_EL0` for use by NS-BL1U
306 and NS-BL2U firmware update images.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100307
308Firmware Update detection and execution
309^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
310
311After performing platform setup, BL1 common code calls
312``bl1_plat_get_next_image_id()`` to determine if `Firmware Update`_ is required or
313to proceed with the normal boot process. If the platform code returns
314``BL2_IMAGE_ID`` then the normal boot sequence is executed as described in the
315next section, else BL1 assumes that `Firmware Update`_ is required and execution
316passes to the first image in the `Firmware Update`_ process. In either case, BL1
317retrieves a descriptor of the next image by calling ``bl1_plat_get_image_desc()``.
318The image descriptor contains an ``entry_point_info_t`` structure, which BL1
319uses to initialize the execution state of the next image.
320
321BL2 image load and execution
322^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
323
324In the normal boot flow, BL1 execution continues as follows:
325
326#. BL1 prints the following string from the primary CPU to indicate successful
327 execution of the BL1 stage:
328
329 ::
330
331 "Booting Trusted Firmware"
332
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000333#. BL1 loads a BL2 raw binary image from platform storage, at a
334 platform-specific base address. Prior to the load, BL1 invokes
335 ``bl1_plat_handle_pre_image_load()`` which allows the platform to update or
336 use the image information. If the BL2 image file is not present or if
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100337 there is not enough free trusted SRAM the following error message is
338 printed:
339
340 ::
341
342 "Failed to load BL2 firmware."
343
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000344#. BL1 invokes ``bl1_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` which again is intended
345 for platforms to take further action after image load. This function must
346 populate the necessary arguments for BL2, which may also include the memory
347 layout. Further description of the memory layout can be found later
348 in this document.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100349
350#. BL1 passes control to the BL2 image at Secure EL1 (for AArch64) or at
351 Secure SVC mode (for AArch32), starting from its load address.
352
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100353BL2
354~~~
355
356BL1 loads and passes control to BL2 at Secure-EL1 (for AArch64) or at Secure
357SVC mode (for AArch32) . BL2 is linked against and loaded at a platform-specific
358base address (more information can be found later in this document).
359The functionality implemented by BL2 is as follows.
360
361Architectural initialization
362^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
363
364For AArch64, BL2 performs the minimal architectural initialization required
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000365for subsequent stages of TF-A and normal world software. EL1 and EL0 are given
366access to Floating Point and Advanced SIMD registers by clearing the
367``CPACR.FPEN`` bits.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100368
369For AArch32, the minimal architectural initialization required for subsequent
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000370stages of TF-A and normal world software is taken care of in BL1 as both BL1
371and BL2 execute at PL1.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100372
373Platform initialization
374^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
375
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000376On Arm platforms, BL2 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100377
378- Initialize the console.
379- Configure any required platform storage to allow loading further bootloader
380 images.
381- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
382- Perform platform security setup to allow access to controlled components.
383- Reserve some memory for passing information to the next bootloader image
384 EL3 Runtime Software and populate it.
385- Define the extents of memory available for loading each subsequent
386 bootloader image.
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000387- If BL1 has passed TB_FW_CONFIG dynamic configuration file in ``arg0``,
388 then parse it.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100389
390Image loading in BL2
391^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
392
Roberto Vargased51b512018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100393BL2 generic code loads the images based on the list of loadable images
394provided by the platform. BL2 passes the list of executable images
395provided by the platform to the next handover BL image.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100396
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000397The list of loadable images provided by the platform may also contain
398dynamic configuration files. The files are loaded and can be parsed as
399needed in the ``bl2_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` function. These
400configuration files can be passed to next Boot Loader stages as arguments
401by updating the corresponding entrypoint information in this function.
402
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100403SCP_BL2 (System Control Processor Firmware) image load
404^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100405
406Some systems have a separate System Control Processor (SCP) for power, clock,
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100407reset and system control. BL2 loads the optional SCP_BL2 image from platform
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100408storage into a platform-specific region of secure memory. The subsequent
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100409handling of SCP_BL2 is platform specific. For example, on the Juno Arm
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100410development platform port the image is transferred into SCP's internal memory
411using the Boot Over MHU (BOM) protocol after being loaded in the trusted SRAM
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100412memory. The SCP executes SCP_BL2 and signals to the Application Processor (AP)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100413for BL2 execution to continue.
414
415EL3 Runtime Software image load
416^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
417
418BL2 loads the EL3 Runtime Software image from platform storage into a platform-
419specific address in trusted SRAM. If there is not enough memory to load the
Roberto Vargased51b512018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100420image or image is missing it leads to an assertion failure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100421
422AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image load
423^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
424
425BL2 loads the optional BL32 image from platform storage into a platform-
426specific region of secure memory. The image executes in the secure world. BL2
427relies on BL31 to pass control to the BL32 image, if present. Hence, BL2
428populates a platform-specific area of memory with the entrypoint/load-address
429of the BL32 image. The value of the Saved Processor Status Register (``SPSR``)
430for entry into BL32 is not determined by BL2, it is initialized by the
431Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (see later) within BL31, which is responsible for
432managing interaction with BL32. This information is passed to BL31.
433
434BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) image load
435^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
436
437BL2 loads the BL33 image (e.g. UEFI or other test or boot software) from
438platform storage into non-secure memory as defined by the platform.
439
440BL2 relies on EL3 Runtime Software to pass control to BL33 once secure state
441initialization is complete. Hence, BL2 populates a platform-specific area of
442memory with the entrypoint and Saved Program Status Register (``SPSR``) of the
443normal world software image. The entrypoint is the load address of the BL33
444image. The ``SPSR`` is determined as specified in Section 5.13 of the
445`PSCI PDD`_. This information is passed to the EL3 Runtime Software.
446
447AArch64 BL31 (EL3 Runtime Software) execution
448^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
449
450BL2 execution continues as follows:
451
452#. BL2 passes control back to BL1 by raising an SMC, providing BL1 with the
453 BL31 entrypoint. The exception is handled by the SMC exception handler
454 installed by BL1.
455
456#. BL1 turns off the MMU and flushes the caches. It clears the
457 ``SCTLR_EL3.M/I/C`` bits, flushes the data cache to the point of coherency
458 and invalidates the TLBs.
459
460#. BL1 passes control to BL31 at the specified entrypoint at EL3.
461
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000462Running BL2 at EL3 execution level
463~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
464
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000465Some platforms have a non-TF-A Boot ROM that expects the next boot stage
466to execute at EL3. On these platforms, TF-A BL1 is a waste of memory
467as its only purpose is to ensure TF-A BL2 is entered at S-EL1. To avoid
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000468this waste, a special mode enables BL2 to execute at EL3, which allows
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000469a non-TF-A Boot ROM to load and jump directly to BL2. This mode is selected
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000470when the build flag BL2_AT_EL3 is enabled. The main differences in this
471mode are:
472
473#. BL2 includes the reset code and the mailbox mechanism to differentiate
474 cold boot and warm boot. It runs at EL3 doing the arch
475 initialization required for EL3.
476
477#. BL2 does not receive the meminfo information from BL1 anymore. This
478 information can be passed by the Boot ROM or be internal to the
479 BL2 image.
480
481#. Since BL2 executes at EL3, BL2 jumps directly to the next image,
482 instead of invoking the RUN_IMAGE SMC call.
483
484
485We assume 3 different types of BootROM support on the platform:
486
487#. The Boot ROM always jumps to the same address, for both cold
488 and warm boot. In this case, we will need to keep a resident part
489 of BL2 whose memory cannot be reclaimed by any other image. The
490 linker script defines the symbols __TEXT_RESIDENT_START__ and
491 __TEXT_RESIDENT_END__ that allows the platform to configure
492 correctly the memory map.
493#. The platform has some mechanism to indicate the jump address to the
494 Boot ROM. Platform code can then program the jump address with
495 psci_warmboot_entrypoint during cold boot.
496#. The platform has some mechanism to program the reset address using
497 the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS feature. Platform code can then
498 program the reset address with psci_warmboot_entrypoint during
499 cold boot, bypassing the boot ROM for warm boot.
500
501In the last 2 cases, no part of BL2 needs to remain resident at
502runtime. In the first 2 cases, we expect the Boot ROM to be able to
503differentiate between warm and cold boot, to avoid loading BL2 again
504during warm boot.
505
506This functionality can be tested with FVP loading the image directly
507in memory and changing the address where the system jumps at reset.
508For example:
509
Dimitris Papastamos42be6fc2018-06-11 11:07:58 +0100510 -C cluster0.cpu0.RVBAR=0x4022000
511 --data cluster0.cpu0=bl2.bin@0x4022000
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000512
513With this configuration, FVP is like a platform of the first case,
514where the Boot ROM jumps always to the same address. For simplification,
515BL32 is loaded in DRAM in this case, to avoid other images reclaiming
516BL2 memory.
517
518
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100519AArch64 BL31
520~~~~~~~~~~~~
521
522The image for this stage is loaded by BL2 and BL1 passes control to BL31 at
523EL3. BL31 executes solely in trusted SRAM. BL31 is linked against and
524loaded at a platform-specific base address (more information can be found later
525in this document). The functionality implemented by BL31 is as follows.
526
527Architectural initialization
528^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
529
530Currently, BL31 performs a similar architectural initialization to BL1 as
531far as system register settings are concerned. Since BL1 code resides in ROM,
532architectural initialization in BL31 allows override of any previous
533initialization done by BL1.
534
535BL31 initializes the per-CPU data framework, which provides a cache of
536frequently accessed per-CPU data optimised for fast, concurrent manipulation
537on different CPUs. This buffer includes pointers to per-CPU contexts, crash
538buffer, CPU reset and power down operations, PSCI data, platform data and so on.
539
540It then replaces the exception vectors populated by BL1 with its own. BL31
541exception vectors implement more elaborate support for handling SMCs since this
542is the only mechanism to access the runtime services implemented by BL31 (PSCI
543for example). BL31 checks each SMC for validity as specified by the
544`SMC calling convention PDD`_ before passing control to the required SMC
545handler routine.
546
547BL31 programs the ``CNTFRQ_EL0`` register with the clock frequency of the system
548counter, which is provided by the platform.
549
550Platform initialization
551^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
552
553BL31 performs detailed platform initialization, which enables normal world
554software to function correctly.
555
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000556On Arm platforms, this consists of the following:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100557
558- Initialize the console.
559- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
560- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
561- Initialize the generic interrupt controller.
562- Initialize the power controller device.
563- Detect the system topology.
564
565Runtime services initialization
566^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
567
568BL31 is responsible for initializing the runtime services. One of them is PSCI.
569
570As part of the PSCI initializations, BL31 detects the system topology. It also
571initializes the data structures that implement the state machine used to track
572the state of power domain nodes. The state can be one of ``OFF``, ``RUN`` or
573``RETENTION``. All secondary CPUs are initially in the ``OFF`` state. The cluster
574that the primary CPU belongs to is ``ON``; any other cluster is ``OFF``. It also
575initializes the locks that protect them. BL31 accesses the state of a CPU or
576cluster immediately after reset and before the data cache is enabled in the
577warm boot path. It is not currently possible to use 'exclusive' based spinlocks,
578therefore BL31 uses locks based on Lamport's Bakery algorithm instead.
579
580The runtime service framework and its initialization is described in more
581detail in the "EL3 runtime services framework" section below.
582
583Details about the status of the PSCI implementation are provided in the
584"Power State Coordination Interface" section below.
585
586AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image initialization
587^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
588
589If a BL32 image is present then there must be a matching Secure-EL1 Payload
590Dispatcher (SPD) service (see later for details). During initialization
591that service must register a function to carry out initialization of BL32
592once the runtime services are fully initialized. BL31 invokes such a
593registered function to initialize BL32 before running BL33. This initialization
594is not necessary for AArch32 SPs.
595
596Details on BL32 initialization and the SPD's role are described in the
597"Secure-EL1 Payloads and Dispatchers" section below.
598
599BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) execution
600^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
601
602EL3 Runtime Software initializes the EL2 or EL1 processor context for normal-
603world cold boot, ensuring that no secure state information finds its way into
604the non-secure execution state. EL3 Runtime Software uses the entrypoint
605information provided by BL2 to jump to the Non-trusted firmware image (BL33)
606at the highest available Exception Level (EL2 if available, otherwise EL1).
607
608Using alternative Trusted Boot Firmware in place of BL1 & BL2 (AArch64 only)
609~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
610
611Some platforms have existing implementations of Trusted Boot Firmware that
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000612would like to use TF-A BL31 for the EL3 Runtime Software. To enable this
613firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully documented and stable
614interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and BL31.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100615
616Future changes to the BL31 interface will be done in a backwards compatible
617way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently enhanced/
618updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
619
620Required CPU state when calling ``bl31_entrypoint()`` during cold boot
621^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
622
623This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
624
625On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch64
626EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
627
628::
629
630 PSTATE.EL = 3
631 PSTATE.RW = 1
632 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
633 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
634
635X0 and X1 can be used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
636platform code in BL31:
637
638::
639
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000640 X0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100641 X1 : Platform specific information
642
643BL31 zero-init sections (e.g. ``.bss``) should not contain valid data on entry,
644these will be zero filled prior to invoking platform setup code.
645
646Use of the X0 and X1 parameters
647'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
648
649The parameters are platform specific and passed from ``bl31_entrypoint()`` to
650``bl31_early_platform_setup()``. The value of these parameters is never directly
651used by the common BL31 code.
652
653The convention is that ``X0`` conveys information regarding the BL31, BL32 and
654BL33 images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``X1`` can be used for other
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000655platform specific purpose. This convention allows platforms which use TF-A's
656BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform specific information from
657Secure Boot without conflicting with future evolution of TF-A using ``X0`` to
658pass a ``bl31_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100659
660BL31 common and SPD initialization code depends on image and entrypoint
661information about BL33 and BL32, which is provided via BL31 platform APIs.
662This information is required until the start of execution of BL33. This
663information can be provided in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
664the platform code in BL31, or provided in a platform defined memory location
665by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware via the
666Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned out of
667the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then accessed by
668BL31 platform code before the caches are enabled.
669
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000670TF-A's BL2 implementation passes a ``bl31_params`` structure in
671``X0`` and the Arm development platforms interpret this in the BL31 platform
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100672code.
673
674MMU, Data caches & Coherency
675''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
676
677BL31 does not depend on the enabled state of the MMU, data caches or
678interconnect coherency on entry to ``bl31_entrypoint()``. If these are disabled
679on entry, these should be enabled during ``bl31_plat_arch_setup()``.
680
681Data structures used in the BL31 cold boot interface
682''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
683
684These structures are designed to support compatibility and independent
685evolution of the structures and the firmware images. For example, a version of
686BL31 that can interpret the BL3x image information from different versions of
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100687BL2, a platform that uses an extended entry_point_info structure to convey
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100688additional register information to BL31, or a ELF image loader that can convey
689more details about the firmware images.
690
691To support these scenarios the structures are versioned and sized, which enables
692BL31 to detect which information is present and respond appropriately. The
693``param_header`` is defined to capture this information:
694
695.. code:: c
696
697 typedef struct param_header {
698 uint8_t type; /* type of the structure */
699 uint8_t version; /* version of this structure */
700 uint16_t size; /* size of this structure in bytes */
701 uint32_t attr; /* attributes: unused bits SBZ */
702 } param_header_t;
703
704The structures using this format are ``entry_point_info``, ``image_info`` and
705``bl31_params``. The code that allocates and populates these structures must set
706the header fields appropriately, and the ``SET_PARAM_HEAD()`` a macro is defined
707to simplify this action.
708
709Required CPU state for BL31 Warm boot initialization
710^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
711
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000712When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, TF-A provides
713the platform power management code with a Warm boot initialization
714entry-point, to be invoked by the CPU immediately after the reset handler.
715On entry to the Warm boot initialization function the calling CPU must be in
716AArch64 EL3, little-endian data access and all interrupt sources masked:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100717
718::
719
720 PSTATE.EL = 3
721 PSTATE.RW = 1
722 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
723 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
724
725The PSCI implementation will initialize the processor state and ensure that the
726platform power management code is then invoked as required to initialize all
727necessary system, cluster and CPU resources.
728
729AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software entrypoint interface
730~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
731
732To enable this firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully
733documented and stable interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and the
734AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software.
735
736Future changes to the entrypoint interface will be done in a backwards
737compatible way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently
738enhanced/updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
739
740Required CPU state when entering during cold boot
741^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
742
743This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
744
745On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch32
746EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
747
748::
749
750 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
751 SCTLR.EE = 0
752
753R0 and R1 are used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
754platform code in AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software:
755
756::
757
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000758 R0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100759 R1 : Platform specific information
760
761Use of the R0 and R1 parameters
762'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
763
764The parameters are platform specific and the convention is that ``R0`` conveys
765information regarding the BL3x images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``R1``
766can be used for other platform specific purpose. This convention allows
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000767platforms which use TF-A's BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform
768specific information from Secure Boot without conflicting with future
769evolution of TF-A using ``R0`` to pass a ``bl_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100770
771The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software is responsible for entry into BL33. This
772information can be obtained in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
773the AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, or provided in a platform defined memory
774location by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware
775via the Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned
776out of the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then
777accessed by AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software before the caches are enabled.
778
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000779When using AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, the Arm development platforms pass a
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100780``bl_params`` structure in ``R0`` from BL2 to be interpreted by AArch32 EL3 Runtime
781Software platform code.
782
783MMU, Data caches & Coherency
784''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
785
786AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must not depend on the enabled state of the MMU,
787data caches or interconnect coherency in its entrypoint. They must be explicitly
788enabled if required.
789
790Data structures used in cold boot interface
791'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
792
793The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software cold boot interface uses ``bl_params`` instead
794of ``bl31_params``. The ``bl_params`` structure is based on the convention
795described in AArch64 BL31 cold boot interface section.
796
797Required CPU state for warm boot initialization
798^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
799
800When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, AArch32 EL3
801Runtime Software must ensure execution of a warm boot initialization entrypoint.
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100802If TF-A BL1 is used and the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS build flag is false,
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000803then AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must ensure that BL1 branches to the warm
804boot entrypoint by arranging for the BL1 platform function,
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100805plat_get_my_entrypoint(), to return a non-zero value.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100806
807In this case, the warm boot entrypoint must be in AArch32 EL3, little-endian
808data access and all interrupt sources masked:
809
810::
811
812 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
813 SCTLR.EE = 0
814
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000815The warm boot entrypoint may be implemented by using TF-A
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100816``psci_warmboot_entrypoint()`` function. In that case, the platform must fulfil
817the pre-requisites mentioned in the `PSCI Library integration guide`_.
818
819EL3 runtime services framework
820------------------------------
821
822Software executing in the non-secure state and in the secure state at exception
823levels lower than EL3 will request runtime services using the Secure Monitor
824Call (SMC) instruction. These requests will follow the convention described in
825the SMC Calling Convention PDD (`SMCCC`_). The `SMCCC`_ assigns function
826identifiers to each SMC request and describes how arguments are passed and
827returned.
828
829The EL3 runtime services framework enables the development of services by
830different providers that can be easily integrated into final product firmware.
831The following sections describe the framework which facilitates the
832registration, initialization and use of runtime services in EL3 Runtime
833Software (BL31).
834
835The design of the runtime services depends heavily on the concepts and
836definitions described in the `SMCCC`_, in particular SMC Function IDs, Owning
837Entity Numbers (OEN), Fast and Yielding calls, and the SMC32 and SMC64 calling
838conventions. Please refer to that document for more detailed explanation of
839these terms.
840
841The following runtime services are expected to be implemented first. They have
842not all been instantiated in the current implementation.
843
844#. Standard service calls
845
846 This service is for management of the entire system. The Power State
847 Coordination Interface (`PSCI`_) is the first set of standard service calls
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000848 defined by Arm (see PSCI section later).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100849
850#. Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher service
851
852 If a system runs a Trusted OS or other Secure-EL1 Payload (SP) then
853 it also requires a *Secure Monitor* at EL3 to switch the EL1 processor
854 context between the normal world (EL1/EL2) and trusted world (Secure-EL1).
855 The Secure Monitor will make these world switches in response to SMCs. The
856 `SMCCC`_ provides for such SMCs with the Trusted OS Call and Trusted
857 Application Call OEN ranges.
858
859 The interface between the EL3 Runtime Software and the Secure-EL1 Payload is
860 not defined by the `SMCCC`_ or any other standard. As a result, each
861 Secure-EL1 Payload requires a specific Secure Monitor that runs as a runtime
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000862 service - within TF-A this service is referred to as the Secure-EL1 Payload
863 Dispatcher (SPD).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100864
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000865 TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and its associated Dispatcher
866 (TSPD). Details of SPD design and TSP/TSPD operation are described in the
867 "Secure-EL1 Payloads and Dispatchers" section below.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100868
869#. CPU implementation service
870
871 This service will provide an interface to CPU implementation specific
872 services for a given platform e.g. access to processor errata workarounds.
873 This service is currently unimplemented.
874
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000875Additional services for Arm Architecture, SiP and OEM calls can be implemented.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100876Each implemented service handles a range of SMC function identifiers as
877described in the `SMCCC`_.
878
879Registration
880~~~~~~~~~~~~
881
882A runtime service is registered using the ``DECLARE_RT_SVC()`` macro, specifying
883the name of the service, the range of OENs covered, the type of service and
884initialization and call handler functions. This macro instantiates a ``const struct rt_svc_desc`` for the service with these details (see ``runtime_svc.h``).
885This structure is allocated in a special ELF section ``rt_svc_descs``, enabling
886the framework to find all service descriptors included into BL31.
887
888The specific service for a SMC Function is selected based on the OEN and call
889type of the Function ID, and the framework uses that information in the service
890descriptor to identify the handler for the SMC Call.
891
892The service descriptors do not include information to identify the precise set
893of SMC function identifiers supported by this service implementation, the
894security state from which such calls are valid nor the capability to support
89564-bit and/or 32-bit callers (using SMC32 or SMC64). Responding appropriately
896to these aspects of a SMC call is the responsibility of the service
897implementation, the framework is focused on integration of services from
898different providers and minimizing the time taken by the framework before the
899service handler is invoked.
900
901Details of the parameters, requirements and behavior of the initialization and
902call handling functions are provided in the following sections.
903
904Initialization
905~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
906
907``runtime_svc_init()`` in ``runtime_svc.c`` initializes the runtime services
908framework running on the primary CPU during cold boot as part of the BL31
909initialization. This happens prior to initializing a Trusted OS and running
910Normal world boot firmware that might in turn use these services.
911Initialization involves validating each of the declared runtime service
912descriptors, calling the service initialization function and populating the
913index used for runtime lookup of the service.
914
915The BL31 linker script collects all of the declared service descriptors into a
916single array and defines symbols that allow the framework to locate and traverse
917the array, and determine its size.
918
919The framework does basic validation of each descriptor to halt firmware
920initialization if service declaration errors are detected. The framework does
921not check descriptors for the following error conditions, and may behave in an
922unpredictable manner under such scenarios:
923
924#. Overlapping OEN ranges
925#. Multiple descriptors for the same range of OENs and ``call_type``
926#. Incorrect range of owning entity numbers for a given ``call_type``
927
928Once validated, the service ``init()`` callback is invoked. This function carries
929out any essential EL3 initialization before servicing requests. The ``init()``
930function is only invoked on the primary CPU during cold boot. If the service
931uses per-CPU data this must either be initialized for all CPUs during this call,
932or be done lazily when a CPU first issues an SMC call to that service. If
933``init()`` returns anything other than ``0``, this is treated as an initialization
934error and the service is ignored: this does not cause the firmware to halt.
935
936The OEN and call type fields present in the SMC Function ID cover a total of
937128 distinct services, but in practice a single descriptor can cover a range of
938OENs, e.g. SMCs to call a Trusted OS function. To optimize the lookup of a
939service handler, the framework uses an array of 128 indices that map every
940distinct OEN/call-type combination either to one of the declared services or to
941indicate the service is not handled. This ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array is
942populated for all of the OENs covered by a service after the service ``init()``
943function has reported success. So a service that fails to initialize will never
944have it's ``handle()`` function invoked.
945
946The following figure shows how the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` index maps the SMC
947Function ID call type and OEN onto a specific service handler in the
948``rt_svc_descs[]`` array.
949
950|Image 1|
951
952Handling an SMC
953~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
954
955When the EL3 runtime services framework receives a Secure Monitor Call, the SMC
956Function ID is passed in W0 from the lower exception level (as per the
957`SMCCC`_). If the calling register width is AArch32, it is invalid to invoke an
958SMC Function which indicates the SMC64 calling convention: such calls are
959ignored and return the Unknown SMC Function Identifier result code ``0xFFFFFFFF``
960in R0/X0.
961
962Bit[31] (fast/yielding call) and bits[29:24] (owning entity number) of the SMC
963Function ID are combined to index into the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array. The
964resulting value might indicate a service that has no handler, in this case the
965framework will also report an Unknown SMC Function ID. Otherwise, the value is
966used as a further index into the ``rt_svc_descs[]`` array to locate the required
967service and handler.
968
969The service's ``handle()`` callback is provided with five of the SMC parameters
970directly, the others are saved into memory for retrieval (if needed) by the
971handler. The handler is also provided with an opaque ``handle`` for use with the
972supporting library for parameter retrieval, setting return values and context
973manipulation; and with ``flags`` indicating the security state of the caller. The
974framework finally sets up the execution stack for the handler, and invokes the
975services ``handle()`` function.
976
977On return from the handler the result registers are populated in X0-X3 before
978restoring the stack and CPU state and returning from the original SMC.
979
Jeenu Viswambharane31d76f2017-10-18 14:30:53 +0100980Exception Handling Framework
981----------------------------
982
983Please refer to the `Exception Handling Framework`_ document.
984
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100985Power State Coordination Interface
986----------------------------------
987
988TODO: Provide design walkthrough of PSCI implementation.
989
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +0100990The PSCI v1.1 specification categorizes APIs as optional and mandatory. All the
991mandatory APIs in PSCI v1.1, PSCI v1.0 and in PSCI v0.2 draft specification
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100992`Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_ are implemented. The table lists
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +0100993the PSCI v1.1 APIs and their support in generic code.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100994
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100995An API implementation might have a dependency on platform code e.g. CPU_SUSPEND
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100996requires the platform to export a part of the implementation. Hence the level
997of support of the mandatory APIs depends upon the support exported by the
998platform port as well. The Juno and FVP (all variants) platforms export all the
999required support.
1000
1001+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001002| PSCI v1.1 API | Supported | Comments |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001003+=============================+=============+===============================+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001004| ``PSCI_VERSION`` | Yes | The version returned is 1.1 |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001005+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1006| ``CPU_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
1007+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1008| ``CPU_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
1009+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1010| ``CPU_ON`` | Yes\* | |
1011+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1012| ``AFFINITY_INFO`` | Yes | |
1013+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1014| ``MIGRATE`` | Yes\*\* | |
1015+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1016| ``MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE`` | Yes\*\* | |
1017+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1018| ``MIGRATE_INFO_CPU`` | Yes\*\* | |
1019+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1020| ``SYSTEM_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
1021+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1022| ``SYSTEM_RESET`` | Yes\* | |
1023+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1024| ``PSCI_FEATURES`` | Yes | |
1025+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1026| ``CPU_FREEZE`` | No | |
1027+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1028| ``CPU_DEFAULT_SUSPEND`` | No | |
1029+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1030| ``NODE_HW_STATE`` | Yes\* | |
1031+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1032| ``SYSTEM_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
1033+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1034| ``PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE`` | No | |
1035+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1036| ``PSCI_STAT_RESIDENCY`` | Yes\* | |
1037+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1038| ``PSCI_STAT_COUNT`` | Yes\* | |
1039+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001040| ``SYSTEM_RESET2`` | Yes\* | |
1041+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1042| ``MEM_PROTECT`` | Yes\* | |
1043+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1044| ``MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE`` | Yes\* | |
1045+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001046
1047\*Note : These PSCI APIs require platform power management hooks to be
1048registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1049
1050\*\*Note : These PSCI APIs require appropriate Secure Payload Dispatcher
1051hooks to be registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1052
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001053The PSCI implementation in TF-A is a library which can be integrated with
1054AArch64 or AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software for Armv8-A systems. A guide to
1055integrating PSCI library with AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software can be found
1056`here`_.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001057
1058Secure-EL1 Payloads and Dispatchers
1059-----------------------------------
1060
1061On a production system that includes a Trusted OS running in Secure-EL1/EL0,
1062the Trusted OS is coupled with a companion runtime service in the BL31
1063firmware. This service is responsible for the initialisation of the Trusted
1064OS and all communications with it. The Trusted OS is the BL32 stage of the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001065boot flow in TF-A. The firmware will attempt to locate, load and execute a
1066BL32 image.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001067
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001068TF-A uses a more general term for the BL32 software that runs at Secure-EL1 -
1069the *Secure-EL1 Payload* - as it is not always a Trusted OS.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001070
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001071TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and a Test Secure-EL1 Payload
1072Dispatcher (TSPD) service as an example of how a Trusted OS is supported on a
1073production system using the Runtime Services Framework. On such a system, the
1074Test BL32 image and service are replaced by the Trusted OS and its dispatcher
1075service. The TF-A build system expects that the dispatcher will define the
1076build flag ``NEED_BL32`` to enable it to include the BL32 in the build either
1077as a binary or to compile from source depending on whether the ``BL32`` build
1078option is specified or not.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001079
1080The TSP runs in Secure-EL1. It is designed to demonstrate synchronous
1081communication with the normal-world software running in EL1/EL2. Communication
1082is initiated by the normal-world software
1083
1084- either directly through a Fast SMC (as defined in the `SMCCC`_)
1085
1086- or indirectly through a `PSCI`_ SMC. The `PSCI`_ implementation in turn
1087 informs the TSPD about the requested power management operation. This allows
1088 the TSP to prepare for or respond to the power state change
1089
1090The TSPD service is responsible for.
1091
1092- Initializing the TSP
1093
1094- Routing requests and responses between the secure and the non-secure
1095 states during the two types of communications just described
1096
1097Initializing a BL32 Image
1098~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1099
1100The Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (SPD) service is responsible for initializing
1101the BL32 image. It needs access to the information passed by BL2 to BL31 to do
1102so. This is provided by:
1103
1104.. code:: c
1105
1106 entry_point_info_t *bl31_plat_get_next_image_ep_info(uint32_t);
1107
1108which returns a reference to the ``entry_point_info`` structure corresponding to
1109the image which will be run in the specified security state. The SPD uses this
1110API to get entry point information for the SECURE image, BL32.
1111
1112In the absence of a BL32 image, BL31 passes control to the normal world
1113bootloader image (BL33). When the BL32 image is present, it is typical
1114that the SPD wants control to be passed to BL32 first and then later to BL33.
1115
1116To do this the SPD has to register a BL32 initialization function during
1117initialization of the SPD service. The BL32 initialization function has this
1118prototype:
1119
1120.. code:: c
1121
1122 int32_t init(void);
1123
1124and is registered using the ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` function.
1125
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001126TF-A supports two approaches for the SPD to pass control to BL32 before
1127returning through EL3 and running the non-trusted firmware (BL33):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001128
1129#. In the BL32 setup function, use ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` to
1130 request that the exit from ``bl31_main()`` is to the BL32 entrypoint in
1131 Secure-EL1. BL31 will exit to BL32 using the asynchronous method by
1132 calling ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` and ``el3_exit()``.
1133
1134 When the BL32 has completed initialization at Secure-EL1, it returns to
1135 BL31 by issuing an SMC, using a Function ID allocated to the SPD. On
1136 receipt of this SMC, the SPD service handler should switch the CPU context
1137 from trusted to normal world and use the ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` and
1138 ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` functions to set up the initial return to
1139 the normal world firmware BL33. On return from the handler the framework
1140 will exit to EL2 and run BL33.
1141
1142#. The BL32 setup function registers an initialization function using
1143 ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` which provides a SPD-defined mechanism to
1144 invoke a 'world-switch synchronous call' to Secure-EL1 to run the BL32
1145 entrypoint.
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001146 NOTE: The Test SPD service included with TF-A provides one implementation
1147 of such a mechanism.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001148
1149 On completion BL32 returns control to BL31 via a SMC, and on receipt the
1150 SPD service handler invokes the synchronous call return mechanism to return
1151 to the BL32 initialization function. On return from this function,
1152 ``bl31_main()`` will set up the return to the normal world firmware BL33 and
1153 continue the boot process in the normal world.
1154
Jeenu Viswambharan579b4ad2017-08-24 15:43:44 +01001155Crash Reporting in BL31
1156-----------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001157
1158BL31 implements a scheme for reporting the processor state when an unhandled
1159exception is encountered. The reporting mechanism attempts to preserve all the
1160register contents and report it via a dedicated UART (PL011 console). BL31
1161reports the general purpose, EL3, Secure EL1 and some EL2 state registers.
1162
1163A dedicated per-CPU crash stack is maintained by BL31 and this is retrieved via
1164the per-CPU pointer cache. The implementation attempts to minimise the memory
1165required for this feature. The file ``crash_reporting.S`` contains the
1166implementation for crash reporting.
1167
1168The sample crash output is shown below.
1169
1170::
1171
1172 x0 :0x000000004F00007C
1173 x1 :0x0000000007FFFFFF
1174 x2 :0x0000000004014D50
1175 x3 :0x0000000000000000
1176 x4 :0x0000000088007998
1177 x5 :0x00000000001343AC
1178 x6 :0x0000000000000016
1179 x7 :0x00000000000B8A38
1180 x8 :0x00000000001343AC
1181 x9 :0x00000000000101A8
1182 x10 :0x0000000000000002
1183 x11 :0x000000000000011C
1184 x12 :0x00000000FEFDC644
1185 x13 :0x00000000FED93FFC
1186 x14 :0x0000000000247950
1187 x15 :0x00000000000007A2
1188 x16 :0x00000000000007A4
1189 x17 :0x0000000000247950
1190 x18 :0x0000000000000000
1191 x19 :0x00000000FFFFFFFF
1192 x20 :0x0000000004014D50
1193 x21 :0x000000000400A38C
1194 x22 :0x0000000000247950
1195 x23 :0x0000000000000010
1196 x24 :0x0000000000000024
1197 x25 :0x00000000FEFDC868
1198 x26 :0x00000000FEFDC86A
1199 x27 :0x00000000019EDEDC
1200 x28 :0x000000000A7CFDAA
1201 x29 :0x0000000004010780
1202 x30 :0x000000000400F004
1203 scr_el3 :0x0000000000000D3D
1204 sctlr_el3 :0x0000000000C8181F
1205 cptr_el3 :0x0000000000000000
1206 tcr_el3 :0x0000000080803520
1207 daif :0x00000000000003C0
1208 mair_el3 :0x00000000000004FF
1209 spsr_el3 :0x00000000800003CC
1210 elr_el3 :0x000000000400C0CC
1211 ttbr0_el3 :0x00000000040172A0
1212 esr_el3 :0x0000000096000210
1213 sp_el3 :0x0000000004014D50
1214 far_el3 :0x000000004F00007C
1215 spsr_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1216 elr_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1217 spsr_abt :0x0000000000000000
1218 spsr_und :0x0000000000000000
1219 spsr_irq :0x0000000000000000
1220 spsr_fiq :0x0000000000000000
1221 sctlr_el1 :0x0000000030C81807
1222 actlr_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1223 cpacr_el1 :0x0000000000300000
1224 csselr_el1 :0x0000000000000002
1225 sp_el1 :0x0000000004028800
1226 esr_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1227 ttbr0_el1 :0x000000000402C200
1228 ttbr1_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1229 mair_el1 :0x00000000000004FF
1230 amair_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1231 tcr_el1 :0x0000000000003520
1232 tpidr_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1233 tpidr_el0 :0x0000000000000000
1234 tpidrro_el0 :0x0000000000000000
1235 dacr32_el2 :0x0000000000000000
1236 ifsr32_el2 :0x0000000000000000
1237 par_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1238 far_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1239 afsr0_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1240 afsr1_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1241 contextidr_el1 :0x0000000000000000
1242 vbar_el1 :0x0000000004027000
1243 cntp_ctl_el0 :0x0000000000000000
1244 cntp_cval_el0 :0x0000000000000000
1245 cntv_ctl_el0 :0x0000000000000000
1246 cntv_cval_el0 :0x0000000000000000
1247 cntkctl_el1 :0x0000000000000000
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001248 sp_el0 :0x0000000004010780
1249
1250Guidelines for Reset Handlers
1251-----------------------------
1252
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001253TF-A implements a framework that allows CPU and platform ports to perform
1254actions very early after a CPU is released from reset in both the cold and warm
1255boot paths. This is done by calling the ``reset_handler()`` function in both
1256the BL1 and BL31 images. It in turn calls the platform and CPU specific reset
1257handling functions.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001258
1259Details for implementing a CPU specific reset handler can be found in
1260Section 8. Details for implementing a platform specific reset handler can be
1261found in the `Porting Guide`_ (see the ``plat_reset_handler()`` function).
1262
1263When adding functionality to a reset handler, keep in mind that if a different
1264reset handling behavior is required between the first and the subsequent
1265invocations of the reset handling code, this should be detected at runtime.
1266In other words, the reset handler should be able to detect whether an action has
1267already been performed and act as appropriate. Possible courses of actions are,
1268e.g. skip the action the second time, or undo/redo it.
1269
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001270Configuring secure interrupts
1271-----------------------------
1272
1273The GIC driver is responsible for performing initial configuration of secure
1274interrupts on the platform. To this end, the platform is expected to provide the
1275GIC driver (either GICv2 or GICv3, as selected by the platform) with the
1276interrupt configuration during the driver initialisation.
1277
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001278Secure interrupt configuration are specified in an array of secure interrupt
1279properties. In this scheme, in both GICv2 and GICv3 driver data structures, the
1280``interrupt_props`` member points to an array of interrupt properties. Each
Antonio Nino Diaz73308612019-02-28 13:35:21 +00001281element of the array specifies the interrupt number and its attributes
1282(priority, group, configuration). Each element of the array shall be populated
1283by the macro ``INTR_PROP_DESC()``. The macro takes the following arguments:
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001284
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001285- 10-bit interrupt number,
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001286
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001287- 8-bit interrupt priority,
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001288
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001289- Interrupt type (one of ``INTR_TYPE_EL3``, ``INTR_TYPE_S_EL1``,
1290 ``INTR_TYPE_NS``),
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001291
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001292- Interrupt configuration (either ``GIC_INTR_CFG_LEVEL`` or
1293 ``GIC_INTR_CFG_EDGE``).
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001294
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001295CPU specific operations framework
1296---------------------------------
1297
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001298Certain aspects of the Armv8-A architecture are implementation defined,
1299that is, certain behaviours are not architecturally defined, but must be
1300defined and documented by individual processor implementations. TF-A
1301implements a framework which categorises the common implementation defined
1302behaviours and allows a processor to export its implementation of that
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001303behaviour. The categories are:
1304
1305#. Processor specific reset sequence.
1306
1307#. Processor specific power down sequences.
1308
1309#. Processor specific register dumping as a part of crash reporting.
1310
1311#. Errata status reporting.
1312
1313Each of the above categories fulfils a different requirement.
1314
1315#. allows any processor specific initialization before the caches and MMU
1316 are turned on, like implementation of errata workarounds, entry into
1317 the intra-cluster coherency domain etc.
1318
1319#. allows each processor to implement the power down sequence mandated in
1320 its Technical Reference Manual (TRM).
1321
1322#. allows a processor to provide additional information to the developer
1323 in the event of a crash, for example Cortex-A53 has registers which
1324 can expose the data cache contents.
1325
1326#. allows a processor to define a function that inspects and reports the status
1327 of all errata workarounds on that processor.
1328
1329Please note that only 2. is mandated by the TRM.
1330
1331The CPU specific operations framework scales to accommodate a large number of
1332different CPUs during power down and reset handling. The platform can specify
1333any CPU optimization it wants to enable for each CPU. It can also specify
1334the CPU errata workarounds to be applied for each CPU type during reset
1335handling by defining CPU errata compile time macros. Details on these macros
1336can be found in the `cpu-specific-build-macros.rst`_ file.
1337
1338The CPU specific operations framework depends on the ``cpu_ops`` structure which
1339needs to be exported for each type of CPU in the platform. It is defined in
1340``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and has the following fields : ``midr``,
1341``reset_func()``, ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` (array of power down functions) and
1342``cpu_reg_dump()``.
1343
1344The CPU specific files in ``lib/cpus`` export a ``cpu_ops`` data structure with
1345suitable handlers for that CPU. For example, ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cortex_a53.S``
1346exports the ``cpu_ops`` for Cortex-A53 CPU. According to the platform
1347configuration, these CPU specific files must be included in the build by
1348the platform makefile. The generic CPU specific operations framework code exists
1349in ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_helpers.S``.
1350
1351CPU specific Reset Handling
1352~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1353
1354After a reset, the state of the CPU when it calls generic reset handler is:
1355MMU turned off, both instruction and data caches turned off and not part
1356of any coherency domain.
1357
1358The BL entrypoint code first invokes the ``plat_reset_handler()`` to allow
1359the platform to perform any system initialization required and any system
1360errata workarounds that needs to be applied. The ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` reads
1361the current CPU midr, finds the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry in the ``cpu_ops``
1362array and returns it. Note that only the part number and implementer fields
1363in midr are used to find the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry. The ``reset_func()`` in
1364the returned ``cpu_ops`` is then invoked which executes the required reset
1365handling for that CPU and also any errata workarounds enabled by the platform.
1366This function must preserve the values of general purpose registers x20 to x29.
1367
1368Refer to Section "Guidelines for Reset Handlers" for general guidelines
1369regarding placement of code in a reset handler.
1370
1371CPU specific power down sequence
1372~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1373
1374During the BL31 initialization sequence, the pointer to the matching ``cpu_ops``
1375entry is stored in per-CPU data by ``init_cpu_ops()`` so that it can be quickly
1376retrieved during power down sequences.
1377
1378Various CPU drivers register handlers to perform power down at certain power
1379levels for that specific CPU. The PSCI service, upon receiving a power down
1380request, determines the highest power level at which to execute power down
1381sequence for a particular CPU. It uses the ``prepare_cpu_pwr_dwn()`` function to
1382pick the right power down handler for the requested level. The function
1383retrieves ``cpu_ops`` pointer member of per-CPU data, and from that, further
1384retrieves ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` array, and indexes into the required level. If the
1385requested power level is higher than what a CPU driver supports, the handler
1386registered for highest level is invoked.
1387
1388At runtime the platform hooks for power down are invoked by the PSCI service to
1389perform platform specific operations during a power down sequence, for example
1390turning off CCI coherency during a cluster power down.
1391
1392CPU specific register reporting during crash
1393~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1394
1395If the crash reporting is enabled in BL31, when a crash occurs, the crash
1396reporting framework calls ``do_cpu_reg_dump`` which retrieves the matching
1397``cpu_ops`` using ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` function. The ``cpu_reg_dump()`` in
1398``cpu_ops`` is invoked, which then returns the CPU specific register values to
1399be reported and a pointer to the ASCII list of register names in a format
1400expected by the crash reporting framework.
1401
1402CPU errata status reporting
1403~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1404
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001405Errata workarounds for CPUs supported in TF-A are applied during both cold and
1406warm boots, shortly after reset. Individual Errata workarounds are enabled as
1407build options. Some errata workarounds have potential run-time implications;
1408therefore some are enabled by default, others not. Platform ports shall
1409override build options to enable or disable errata as appropriate. The CPU
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001410drivers take care of applying errata workarounds that are enabled and applicable
1411to a given CPU. Refer to the section titled *CPU Errata Workarounds* in `CPUBM`_
1412for more information.
1413
1414Functions in CPU drivers that apply errata workaround must follow the
1415conventions listed below.
1416
1417The errata workaround must be authored as two separate functions:
1418
1419- One that checks for errata. This function must determine whether that errata
1420 applies to the current CPU. Typically this involves matching the current
1421 CPUs revision and variant against a value that's known to be affected by the
1422 errata. If the function determines that the errata applies to this CPU, it
1423 must return ``ERRATA_APPLIES``; otherwise, it must return
1424 ``ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES``. The utility functions ``cpu_get_rev_var`` and
1425 ``cpu_rev_var_ls`` functions may come in handy for this purpose.
1426
1427For an errata identified as ``E``, the check function must be named
1428``check_errata_E``.
1429
1430This function will be invoked at different times, both from assembly and from
1431C run time. Therefore it must follow AAPCS, and must not use stack.
1432
1433- Another one that applies the errata workaround. This function would call the
1434 check function described above, and applies errata workaround if required.
1435
1436CPU drivers that apply errata workaround can optionally implement an assembly
1437function that report the status of errata workarounds pertaining to that CPU.
Antonio Nino Diaz73308612019-02-28 13:35:21 +00001438For a driver that registers the CPU, for example, ``cpux`` via ``declare_cpu_ops``
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001439macro, the errata reporting function, if it exists, must be named
1440``cpux_errata_report``. This function will always be called with MMU enabled; it
1441must follow AAPCS and may use stack.
1442
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001443In a debug build of TF-A, on a CPU that comes out of reset, both BL1 and the
1444runtime firmware (BL31 in AArch64, and BL32 in AArch32) will invoke errata
1445status reporting function, if one exists, for that type of CPU.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001446
1447To report the status of each errata workaround, the function shall use the
1448assembler macro ``report_errata``, passing it:
1449
1450- The build option that enables the errata;
1451
1452- The name of the CPU: this must be the same identifier that CPU driver
1453 registered itself with, using ``declare_cpu_ops``;
1454
1455- And the errata identifier: the identifier must match what's used in the
1456 errata's check function described above.
1457
1458The errata status reporting function will be called once per CPU type/errata
1459combination during the software's active life time.
1460
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001461It's expected that whenever an errata workaround is submitted to TF-A, the
1462errata reporting function is appropriately extended to report its status as
1463well.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001464
1465Reporting the status of errata workaround is for informational purpose only; it
1466has no functional significance.
1467
1468Memory layout of BL images
1469--------------------------
1470
1471Each bootloader image can be divided in 2 parts:
1472
1473- the static contents of the image. These are data actually stored in the
1474 binary on the disk. In the ELF terminology, they are called ``PROGBITS``
1475 sections;
1476
1477- the run-time contents of the image. These are data that don't occupy any
1478 space in the binary on the disk. The ELF binary just contains some
1479 metadata indicating where these data will be stored at run-time and the
1480 corresponding sections need to be allocated and initialized at run-time.
1481 In the ELF terminology, they are called ``NOBITS`` sections.
1482
1483All PROGBITS sections are grouped together at the beginning of the image,
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001484followed by all NOBITS sections. This is true for all TF-A images and it is
1485governed by the linker scripts. This ensures that the raw binary images are
1486as small as possible. If a NOBITS section was inserted in between PROGBITS
1487sections then the resulting binary file would contain zero bytes in place of
1488this NOBITS section, making the image unnecessarily bigger. Smaller images
1489allow faster loading from the FIP to the main memory.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001490
1491Linker scripts and symbols
1492~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1493
1494Each bootloader stage image layout is described by its own linker script. The
1495linker scripts export some symbols into the program symbol table. Their values
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001496correspond to particular addresses. TF-A code can refer to these symbols to
1497figure out the image memory layout.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001498
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001499Linker symbols follow the following naming convention in TF-A.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001500
1501- ``__<SECTION>_START__``
1502
1503 Start address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``.
1504
1505- ``__<SECTION>_END__``
1506
1507 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an alignment
1508 constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_END__`` corresponds
1509 to the end address of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the right
1510 boundary. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__`` to know the
1511 actual end address of the section's contents.
1512
1513- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__``
1514
1515 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1516 rounding up due to some alignment constraint.
1517
1518- ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1519
1520 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an
1521 alignment constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1522 corresponds to the size of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the
1523 right boundary. In other words, ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_END__ - _<SECTION>_START__``. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1524 to know the actual size of the section's contents.
1525
1526- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1527
1528 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1529 rounding up due to some alignment constraint. In other words,
1530 ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__ - __<SECTION>_START__``.
1531
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001532Some of the linker symbols are mandatory as TF-A code relies on them to be
1533defined. They are listed in the following subsections. Some of them must be
1534provided for each bootloader stage and some are specific to a given bootloader
1535stage.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001536
1537The linker scripts define some extra, optional symbols. They are not actually
1538used by any code but they help in understanding the bootloader images' memory
1539layout as they are easy to spot in the link map files.
1540
1541Common linker symbols
1542^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1543
1544All BL images share the following requirements:
1545
1546- The BSS section must be zero-initialised before executing any C code.
1547- The coherent memory section (if enabled) must be zero-initialised as well.
1548- The MMU setup code needs to know the extents of the coherent and read-only
1549 memory regions to set the right memory attributes. When
1550 ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA=1``, it needs to know more specifically how the
1551 read-only memory region is divided between code and data.
1552
1553The following linker symbols are defined for this purpose:
1554
1555- ``__BSS_START__``
1556- ``__BSS_SIZE__``
1557- ``__COHERENT_RAM_START__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1558- ``__COHERENT_RAM_END__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1559- ``__COHERENT_RAM_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1560- ``__RO_START__``
1561- ``__RO_END__``
1562- ``__TEXT_START__``
1563- ``__TEXT_END__``
1564- ``__RODATA_START__``
1565- ``__RODATA_END__``
1566
1567BL1's linker symbols
1568^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1569
1570BL1 being the ROM image, it has additional requirements. BL1 resides in ROM and
1571it is entirely executed in place but it needs some read-write memory for its
1572mutable data. Its ``.data`` section (i.e. its allocated read-write data) must be
1573relocated from ROM to RAM before executing any C code.
1574
1575The following additional linker symbols are defined for BL1:
1576
1577- ``__BL1_ROM_END__`` End address of BL1's ROM contents, covering its code
1578 and ``.data`` section in ROM.
1579- ``__DATA_ROM_START__`` Start address of the ``.data`` section in ROM. Must be
1580 aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1581- ``__DATA_RAM_START__`` Address in RAM where the ``.data`` section should be
1582 copied over. Must be aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1583- ``__DATA_SIZE__`` Size of the ``.data`` section (in ROM or RAM).
1584- ``__BL1_RAM_START__`` Start address of BL1 read-write data.
1585- ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` End address of BL1 read-write data.
1586
1587How to choose the right base addresses for each bootloader stage image
1588~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1589
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001590There is currently no support for dynamic image loading in TF-A. This means
1591that all bootloader images need to be linked against their ultimate runtime
1592locations and the base addresses of each image must be chosen carefully such
1593that images don't overlap each other in an undesired way. As the code grows,
1594the base addresses might need adjustments to cope with the new memory layout.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001595
1596The memory layout is completely specific to the platform and so there is no
1597general recipe for choosing the right base addresses for each bootloader image.
1598However, there are tools to aid in understanding the memory layout. These are
1599the link map files: ``build/<platform>/<build-type>/bl<x>/bl<x>.map``, with ``<x>``
1600being the stage bootloader. They provide a detailed view of the memory usage of
1601each image. Among other useful information, they provide the end address of
1602each image.
1603
1604- ``bl1.map`` link map file provides ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` address.
1605- ``bl2.map`` link map file provides ``__BL2_END__`` address.
1606- ``bl31.map`` link map file provides ``__BL31_END__`` address.
1607- ``bl32.map`` link map file provides ``__BL32_END__`` address.
1608
1609For each bootloader image, the platform code must provide its start address
1610as well as a limit address that it must not overstep. The latter is used in the
1611linker scripts to check that the image doesn't grow past that address. If that
1612happens, the linker will issue a message similar to the following:
1613
1614::
1615
1616 aarch64-none-elf-ld: BLx has exceeded its limit.
1617
1618Additionally, if the platform memory layout implies some image overlaying like
1619on FVP, BL31 and TSP need to know the limit address that their PROGBITS
1620sections must not overstep. The platform code must provide those.
1621
Soby Mathew509af922018-09-27 16:46:41 +01001622TF-A does not provide any mechanism to verify at boot time that the memory
1623to load a new image is free to prevent overwriting a previously loaded image.
1624The platform must specify the memory available in the system for all the
1625relevant BL images to be loaded.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001626
1627For example, in the case of BL1 loading BL2, ``bl1_plat_sec_mem_layout()`` will
1628return the region defined by the platform where BL1 intends to load BL2. The
1629``load_image()`` function performs bounds check for the image size based on the
1630base and maximum image size provided by the platforms. Platforms must take
1631this behaviour into account when defining the base/size for each of the images.
1632
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001633Memory layout on Arm development platforms
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001634^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1635
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001636The following list describes the memory layout on the Arm development platforms:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001637
1638- A 4KB page of shared memory is used for communication between Trusted
1639 Firmware and the platform's power controller. This is located at the base of
1640 Trusted SRAM. The amount of Trusted SRAM available to load the bootloader
1641 images is reduced by the size of the shared memory.
1642
1643 The shared memory is used to store the CPUs' entrypoint mailbox. On Juno,
1644 this is also used for the MHU payload when passing messages to and from the
1645 SCP.
1646
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001647- Another 4 KB page is reserved for passing memory layout between BL1 and BL2
1648 and also the dynamic firmware configurations.
1649
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001650- On FVP, BL1 is originally sitting in the Trusted ROM at address ``0x0``. On
1651 Juno, BL1 resides in flash memory at address ``0x0BEC0000``. BL1 read-write
1652 data are relocated to the top of Trusted SRAM at runtime.
1653
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001654- BL2 is loaded below BL1 RW
1655
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001656- EL3 Runtime Software, BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32 (e.g. SP_MIN),
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001657 is loaded at the top of the Trusted SRAM, such that its NOBITS sections will
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001658 overwrite BL1 R/W data and BL2. This implies that BL1 global variables
1659 remain valid only until execution reaches the EL3 Runtime Software entry
1660 point during a cold boot.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001661
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001662- On Juno, SCP_BL2 is loaded temporarily into the EL3 Runtime Software memory
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001663 region and transfered to the SCP before being overwritten by EL3 Runtime
1664 Software.
1665
1666- BL32 (for AArch64) can be loaded in one of the following locations:
1667
1668 - Trusted SRAM
1669 - Trusted DRAM (FVP only)
1670 - Secure region of DRAM (top 16MB of DRAM configured by the TrustZone
1671 controller)
1672
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001673 When BL32 (for AArch64) is loaded into Trusted SRAM, it is loaded below
1674 BL31.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001675
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001676The location of the BL32 image will result in different memory maps. This is
1677illustrated for both FVP and Juno in the following diagrams, using the TSP as
1678an example.
1679
1680Note: Loading the BL32 image in TZC secured DRAM doesn't change the memory
1681layout of the other images in Trusted SRAM.
1682
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001683CONFIG section in memory layouts shown below contains:
1684
1685::
1686
1687 +--------------------+
1688 |bl2_mem_params_descs|
1689 |--------------------|
1690 | fw_configs |
1691 +--------------------+
1692
1693``bl2_mem_params_descs`` contains parameters passed from BL2 to next the
1694BL image during boot.
1695
1696``fw_configs`` includes soc_fw_config, tos_fw_config and tb_fw_config.
1697
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001698**FVP with TSP in Trusted SRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001699(These diagrams only cover the AArch64 case)
1700
1701::
1702
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001703 DRAM
1704 0xffffffff +----------+
1705 : :
1706 |----------|
1707 |HW_CONFIG |
1708 0x83000000 |----------| (non-secure)
1709 | |
1710 0x80000000 +----------+
1711
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001712 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001713 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1714 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1715 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1716 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001717 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1718 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001719 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1720 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
1721 0x04002000 +----------+ +----------------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001722 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001723 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001724 | Shared |
1725 0x04000000 +----------+
1726
1727 Trusted ROM
1728 0x04000000 +----------+
1729 | BL1 (ro) |
1730 0x00000000 +----------+
1731
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001732**FVP with TSP in Trusted DRAM with firmware configs (default option):**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001733
1734::
1735
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001736 DRAM
1737 0xffffffff +--------------+
1738 : :
1739 |--------------|
1740 | HW_CONFIG |
1741 0x83000000 |--------------| (non-secure)
1742 | |
1743 0x80000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001744
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001745 Trusted DRAM
1746 0x08000000 +--------------+
1747 | BL32 |
1748 0x06000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001749
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001750 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001751 0x04040000 +--------------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1752 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1753 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1754 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001755 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1756 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001757 | | +----------------+
1758 +--------------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001759 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001760 0x04001000 +--------------+
1761 | Shared |
1762 0x04000000 +--------------+
1763
1764 Trusted ROM
1765 0x04000000 +--------------+
1766 | BL1 (ro) |
1767 0x00000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001768
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001769**FVP with TSP in TZC-Secured DRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001770
1771::
1772
1773 DRAM
1774 0xffffffff +----------+
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001775 | BL32 | (secure)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001776 0xff000000 +----------+
1777 | |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001778 |----------|
1779 |HW_CONFIG |
1780 0x83000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001781 | |
1782 0x80000000 +----------+
1783
1784 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001785 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1786 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1787 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1788 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001789 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1790 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001791 | | +----------------+
1792 0x04002000 +----------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001793 | CONFIG |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001794 0x04001000 +----------+
1795 | Shared |
1796 0x04000000 +----------+
1797
1798 Trusted ROM
1799 0x04000000 +----------+
1800 | BL1 (ro) |
1801 0x00000000 +----------+
1802
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001803**Juno with BL32 in Trusted SRAM :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001804
1805::
1806
1807 Flash0
1808 0x0C000000 +----------+
1809 : :
1810 0x0BED0000 |----------|
1811 | BL1 (ro) |
1812 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
1813 : :
1814 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
1815 after SCP_BL2 has
1816 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001817 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1818 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1819 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1820 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001821 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1822 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001823 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001824 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
1825 | | +----------------+
1826 | |
1827 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001828 | MHU |
1829 0x04000000 +----------+
1830
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001831**Juno with BL32 in TZC-secured DRAM :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001832
1833::
1834
1835 DRAM
1836 0xFFE00000 +----------+
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001837 | BL32 | (secure)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001838 0xFF000000 |----------|
1839 | |
1840 : : (non-secure)
1841 | |
1842 0x80000000 +----------+
1843
1844 Flash0
1845 0x0C000000 +----------+
1846 : :
1847 0x0BED0000 |----------|
1848 | BL1 (ro) |
1849 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
1850 : :
1851 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
1852 after SCP_BL2 has
1853 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001854 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1855 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1856 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1857 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001858 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1859 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001860 |----------| +----------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001861 0x04001000 +----------+
1862 | MHU |
1863 0x04000000 +----------+
1864
Sathees Balyae36950b2019-01-30 15:56:44 +00001865Library at ROM
1866---------------
1867
1868Please refer to the `ROMLIB Design`_ document.
1869
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001870Firmware Image Package (FIP)
1871----------------------------
1872
1873Using a Firmware Image Package (FIP) allows for packing bootloader images (and
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001874potentially other payloads) into a single archive that can be loaded by TF-A
1875from non-volatile platform storage. A driver to load images from a FIP has
1876been added to the storage layer and allows a package to be read from supported
1877platform storage. A tool to create Firmware Image Packages is also provided
1878and described below.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001879
1880Firmware Image Package layout
1881~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1882
1883The FIP layout consists of a table of contents (ToC) followed by payload data.
1884The ToC itself has a header followed by one or more table entries. The ToC is
Jett Zhou4069fb52017-11-24 16:03:58 +08001885terminated by an end marker entry, and since the size of the ToC is 0 bytes,
1886the offset equals the total size of the FIP file. All ToC entries describe some
1887payload data that has been appended to the end of the binary package. With the
1888information provided in the ToC entry the corresponding payload data can be
1889retrieved.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001890
1891::
1892
1893 ------------------
1894 | ToC Header |
1895 |----------------|
1896 | ToC Entry 0 |
1897 |----------------|
1898 | ToC Entry 1 |
1899 |----------------|
1900 | ToC End Marker |
1901 |----------------|
1902 | |
1903 | Data 0 |
1904 | |
1905 |----------------|
1906 | |
1907 | Data 1 |
1908 | |
1909 ------------------
1910
1911The ToC header and entry formats are described in the header file
1912``include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h``. This file is used by both the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001913tool and TF-A.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001914
1915The ToC header has the following fields:
1916
1917::
1918
1919 `name`: The name of the ToC. This is currently used to validate the header.
1920 `serial_number`: A non-zero number provided by the creation tool
1921 `flags`: Flags associated with this data.
1922 Bits 0-31: Reserved
1923 Bits 32-47: Platform defined
1924 Bits 48-63: Reserved
1925
1926A ToC entry has the following fields:
1927
1928::
1929
1930 `uuid`: All files are referred to by a pre-defined Universally Unique
1931 IDentifier [UUID] . The UUIDs are defined in
1932 `include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h`. The platform translates
1933 the requested image name into the corresponding UUID when accessing the
1934 package.
1935 `offset_address`: The offset address at which the corresponding payload data
1936 can be found. The offset is calculated from the ToC base address.
1937 `size`: The size of the corresponding payload data in bytes.
Etienne Carriered591d762017-08-23 15:43:33 +02001938 `flags`: Flags associated with this entry. None are yet defined.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001939
1940Firmware Image Package creation tool
1941~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1942
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001943The FIP creation tool can be used to pack specified images into a binary
1944package that can be loaded by TF-A from platform storage. The tool currently
1945only supports packing bootloader images. Additional image definitions can be
1946added to the tool as required.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001947
1948The tool can be found in ``tools/fiptool``.
1949
1950Loading from a Firmware Image Package (FIP)
1951~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1952
1953The Firmware Image Package (FIP) driver can load images from a binary package on
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001954non-volatile platform storage. For the Arm development platforms, this is
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001955currently NOR FLASH.
1956
1957Bootloader images are loaded according to the platform policy as specified by
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001958the function ``plat_get_image_source()``. For the Arm development platforms, this
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001959means the platform will attempt to load images from a Firmware Image Package
1960located at the start of NOR FLASH0.
1961
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001962The Arm development platforms' policy is to only allow loading of a known set of
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001963images. The platform policy can be modified to allow additional images.
1964
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001965Use of coherent memory in TF-A
1966------------------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001967
1968There might be loss of coherency when physical memory with mismatched
1969shareability, cacheability and memory attributes is accessed by multiple CPUs
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001970(refer to section B2.9 of `Arm ARM`_ for more details). This possibility occurs
1971in TF-A during power up/down sequences when coherency, MMU and caches are
1972turned on/off incrementally.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001973
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001974TF-A defines coherent memory as a region of memory with Device nGnRE attributes
1975in the translation tables. The translation granule size in TF-A is 4KB. This
1976is the smallest possible size of the coherent memory region.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001977
1978By default, all data structures which are susceptible to accesses with
1979mismatched attributes from various CPUs are allocated in a coherent memory
1980region (refer to section 2.1 of `Porting Guide`_). The coherent memory region
1981accesses are Outer Shareable, non-cacheable and they can be accessed
1982with the Device nGnRE attributes when the MMU is turned on. Hence, at the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001983expense of at least an extra page of memory, TF-A is able to work around
1984coherency issues due to mismatched memory attributes.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001985
1986The alternative to the above approach is to allocate the susceptible data
1987structures in Normal WriteBack WriteAllocate Inner shareable memory. This
1988approach requires the data structures to be designed so that it is possible to
1989work around the issue of mismatched memory attributes by performing software
1990cache maintenance on them.
1991
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001992Disabling the use of coherent memory in TF-A
1993~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001994
1995It might be desirable to avoid the cost of allocating coherent memory on
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001996platforms which are memory constrained. TF-A enables inclusion of coherent
1997memory in firmware images through the build flag ``USE_COHERENT_MEM``.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001998This flag is enabled by default. It can be disabled to choose the second
1999approach described above.
2000
2001The below sections analyze the data structures allocated in the coherent memory
2002region and the changes required to allocate them in normal memory.
2003
2004Coherent memory usage in PSCI implementation
2005~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2006
2007The ``psci_non_cpu_pd_nodes`` data structure stores the platform's power domain
2008tree information for state management of power domains. By default, this data
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002009structure is allocated in the coherent memory region in TF-A because it can be
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002010accessed by multiple CPUs, either with caches enabled or disabled.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002011
2012.. code:: c
2013
2014 typedef struct non_cpu_pwr_domain_node {
2015 /*
2016 * Index of the first CPU power domain node level 0 which has this node
2017 * as its parent.
2018 */
2019 unsigned int cpu_start_idx;
2020
2021 /*
2022 * Number of CPU power domains which are siblings of the domain indexed
2023 * by 'cpu_start_idx' i.e. all the domains in the range 'cpu_start_idx
2024 * -> cpu_start_idx + ncpus' have this node as their parent.
2025 */
2026 unsigned int ncpus;
2027
2028 /*
2029 * Index of the parent power domain node.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002030 */
2031 unsigned int parent_node;
2032
2033 plat_local_state_t local_state;
2034
2035 unsigned char level;
2036
2037 /* For indexing the psci_lock array*/
2038 unsigned char lock_index;
2039 } non_cpu_pd_node_t;
2040
2041In order to move this data structure to normal memory, the use of each of its
2042fields must be analyzed. Fields like ``cpu_start_idx``, ``ncpus``, ``parent_node``
2043``level`` and ``lock_index`` are only written once during cold boot. Hence removing
2044them from coherent memory involves only doing a clean and invalidate of the
2045cache lines after these fields are written.
2046
2047The field ``local_state`` can be concurrently accessed by multiple CPUs in
2048different cache states. A Lamport's Bakery lock ``psci_locks`` is used to ensure
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002049mutual exclusion to this field and a clean and invalidate is needed after it
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002050is written.
2051
2052Bakery lock data
2053~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2054
2055The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_lock_t`` is allocated in coherent memory
2056and is accessed by multiple CPUs with mismatched attributes. ``bakery_lock_t`` is
2057defined as follows:
2058
2059.. code:: c
2060
2061 typedef struct bakery_lock {
2062 /*
2063 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2064 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2065 * choosing its bakery number.
2066 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2067 */
2068 volatile uint16_t lock_data[BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS];
2069 } bakery_lock_t;
2070
2071It is a characteristic of Lamport's Bakery algorithm that the volatile per-CPU
2072fields can be read by all CPUs but only written to by the owning CPU.
2073
2074Depending upon the data cache line size, the per-CPU fields of the
2075``bakery_lock_t`` structure for multiple CPUs may exist on a single cache line.
2076These per-CPU fields can be read and written during lock contention by multiple
2077CPUs with mismatched memory attributes. Since these fields are a part of the
2078lock implementation, they do not have access to any other locking primitive to
2079safeguard against the resulting coherency issues. As a result, simple software
2080cache maintenance is not enough to allocate them in coherent memory. Consider
2081the following example.
2082
2083CPU0 updates its per-CPU field with data cache enabled. This write updates a
2084local cache line which contains a copy of the fields for other CPUs as well. Now
2085CPU1 updates its per-CPU field of the ``bakery_lock_t`` structure with data cache
2086disabled. CPU1 then issues a DCIVAC operation to invalidate any stale copies of
2087its field in any other cache line in the system. This operation will invalidate
2088the update made by CPU0 as well.
2089
2090To use bakery locks when ``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled, the lock data structure
2091has been redesigned. The changes utilise the characteristic of Lamport's Bakery
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002092algorithm mentioned earlier. The bakery_lock structure only allocates the memory
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002093for a single CPU. The macro ``DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`` allocates all the bakery locks
2094needed for a CPU into a section ``bakery_lock``. The linker allocates the memory
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002095for other cores by using the total size allocated for the bakery_lock section
2096and multiplying it with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). This enables software to
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002097perform software cache maintenance on the lock data structure without running
2098into coherency issues associated with mismatched attributes.
2099
2100The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_info_t`` is defined for use when
2101``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled as follows:
2102
2103.. code:: c
2104
2105 typedef struct bakery_info {
2106 /*
2107 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2108 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2109 * choosing its bakery number.
2110 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2111 */
2112 volatile uint16_t lock_data;
2113 } bakery_info_t;
2114
2115The ``bakery_info_t`` represents a single per-CPU field of one lock and
2116the combination of corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` structures for all CPUs in the
2117system represents the complete bakery lock. The view in memory for a system
2118with n bakery locks are:
2119
2120::
2121
2122 bakery_lock section start
2123 |----------------|
2124 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2125 | Lock_0 | for CPU0
2126 |----------------|
2127 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2128 | Lock_1 | for CPU0
2129 |----------------|
2130 | .... |
2131 |----------------|
2132 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2133 | Lock_N | for CPU0
2134 ------------------
2135 | XXXXX |
2136 | Padding to |
2137 | next Cache WB | <--- Calculate PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE, allocate
2138 | Granule | continuous memory for remaining CPUs.
2139 ------------------
2140 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2141 | Lock_0 | for CPU1
2142 |----------------|
2143 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2144 | Lock_1 | for CPU1
2145 |----------------|
2146 | .... |
2147 |----------------|
2148 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2149 | Lock_N | for CPU1
2150 ------------------
2151 | XXXXX |
2152 | Padding to |
2153 | next Cache WB |
2154 | Granule |
2155 ------------------
2156
2157Consider a system of 2 CPUs with 'N' bakery locks as shown above. For an
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002158operation on Lock_N, the corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` in both CPU0 and CPU1
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002159``bakery_lock`` section need to be fetched and appropriate cache operations need
2160to be performed for each access.
2161
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002162On Arm Platforms, bakery locks are used in psci (``psci_locks``) and power controller
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002163driver (``arm_lock``).
2164
2165Non Functional Impact of removing coherent memory
2166~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2167
2168Removal of the coherent memory region leads to the additional software overhead
2169of performing cache maintenance for the affected data structures. However, since
2170the memory where the data structures are allocated is cacheable, the overhead is
2171mostly mitigated by an increase in performance.
2172
2173There is however a performance impact for bakery locks, due to:
2174
2175- Additional cache maintenance operations, and
2176- Multiple cache line reads for each lock operation, since the bakery locks
2177 for each CPU are distributed across different cache lines.
2178
2179The implementation has been optimized to minimize this additional overhead.
2180Measurements indicate that when bakery locks are allocated in Normal memory, the
2181minimum latency of acquiring a lock is on an average 3-4 micro seconds whereas
2182in Device memory the same is 2 micro seconds. The measurements were done on the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002183Juno Arm development platform.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002184
2185As mentioned earlier, almost a page of memory can be saved by disabling
2186``USE_COHERENT_MEM``. Each platform needs to consider these trade-offs to decide
2187whether coherent memory should be used. If a platform disables
2188``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` and needs to use bakery locks in the porting layer, it can
2189optionally define macro ``PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE`` (see the
2190`Porting Guide`_). Refer to the reference platform code for examples.
2191
2192Isolating code and read-only data on separate memory pages
2193----------------------------------------------------------
2194
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002195In the Armv8-A VMSA, translation table entries include fields that define the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002196properties of the target memory region, such as its access permissions. The
2197smallest unit of memory that can be addressed by a translation table entry is
2198a memory page. Therefore, if software needs to set different permissions on two
2199memory regions then it needs to map them using different memory pages.
2200
2201The default memory layout for each BL image is as follows:
2202
2203::
2204
2205 | ... |
2206 +-------------------+
2207 | Read-write data |
2208 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2209 | <Padding> |
2210 +-------------------+
2211 | Exception vectors |
2212 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2213 | <Padding> |
2214 +-------------------+
2215 | Read-only data |
2216 +-------------------+
2217 | Code |
2218 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2219
2220Note: The 2KB alignment for the exception vectors is an architectural
2221requirement.
2222
2223The read-write data start on a new memory page so that they can be mapped with
2224read-write permissions, whereas the code and read-only data below are configured
2225as read-only.
2226
2227However, the read-only data are not aligned on a page boundary. They are
2228contiguous to the code. Therefore, the end of the code section and the beginning
2229of the read-only data one might share a memory page. This forces both to be
2230mapped with the same memory attributes. As the code needs to be executable, this
2231means that the read-only data stored on the same memory page as the code are
2232executable as well. This could potentially be exploited as part of a security
2233attack.
2234
2235TF provides the build flag ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA`` to isolate the code and
2236read-only data on separate memory pages. This in turn allows independent control
2237of the access permissions for the code and read-only data. In this case,
2238platform code gets a finer-grained view of the image layout and can
2239appropriately map the code region as executable and the read-only data as
2240execute-never.
2241
2242This has an impact on memory footprint, as padding bytes need to be introduced
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002243between the code and read-only data to ensure the segregation of the two. To
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002244limit the memory cost, this flag also changes the memory layout such that the
2245code and exception vectors are now contiguous, like so:
2246
2247::
2248
2249 | ... |
2250 +-------------------+
2251 | Read-write data |
2252 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2253 | <Padding> |
2254 +-------------------+
2255 | Read-only data |
2256 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2257 | <Padding> |
2258 +-------------------+
2259 | Exception vectors |
2260 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2261 | <Padding> |
2262 +-------------------+
2263 | Code |
2264 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2265
2266With this more condensed memory layout, the separation of read-only data will
2267add zero or one page to the memory footprint of each BL image. Each platform
2268should consider the trade-off between memory footprint and security.
2269
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002270This build flag is disabled by default, minimising memory footprint. On Arm
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002271platforms, it is enabled.
2272
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002273Publish and Subscribe Framework
2274-------------------------------
2275
2276The Publish and Subscribe Framework allows EL3 components to define and publish
2277events, to which other EL3 components can subscribe.
2278
2279The following macros are provided by the framework:
2280
2281- ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(event)``: Defines an event, and takes one argument,
2282 the event name, which must be a valid C identifier. All calls to
2283 ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` macro must be placed in the file
2284 ``pubsub_events.h``.
2285
2286- ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG(event, arg)``: Publishes a defined event, by iterating
2287 subscribed handlers and calling them in turn. The handlers will be passed the
2288 parameter ``arg``. The expected use-case is to broadcast an event.
2289
2290- ``PUBLISH_EVENT(event)``: Like ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG``, except that the value
2291 ``NULL`` is passed to subscribed handlers.
2292
2293- ``SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(event, handler)``: Registers the ``handler`` to
2294 subscribe to ``event``. The handler will be executed whenever the ``event``
2295 is published.
2296
2297- ``for_each_subscriber(event, subscriber)``: Iterates through all handlers
2298 subscribed for ``event``. ``subscriber`` must be a local variable of type
2299 ``pubsub_cb_t *``, and will point to each subscribed handler in turn during
2300 iteration. This macro can be used for those patterns that none of the
2301 ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros cover.
2302
2303Publishing an event that wasn't defined using ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` will
2304result in build error. Subscribing to an undefined event however won't.
2305
2306Subscribed handlers must be of type ``pubsub_cb_t``, with following function
2307signature:
2308
2309::
2310
2311 typedef void* (*pubsub_cb_t)(const void *arg);
2312
2313There may be arbitrary number of handlers registered to the same event. The
2314order in which subscribed handlers are notified when that event is published is
2315not defined. Subscribed handlers may be executed in any order; handlers should
2316not assume any relative ordering amongst them.
2317
2318Publishing an event on a PE will result in subscribed handlers executing on that
2319PE only; it won't cause handlers to execute on a different PE.
2320
2321Note that publishing an event on a PE blocks until all the subscribed handlers
2322finish executing on the PE.
2323
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002324TF-A generic code publishes and subscribes to some events within. Platform
2325ports are discouraged from subscribing to them. These events may be withdrawn,
2326renamed, or have their semantics altered in the future. Platforms may however
2327register, publish, and subscribe to platform-specific events.
Dimitris Papastamos17b4c0d2017-10-13 15:27:58 +01002328
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002329Publish and Subscribe Example
2330~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2331
2332A publisher that wants to publish event ``foo`` would:
2333
2334- Define the event ``foo`` in the ``pubsub_events.h``.
2335
2336 ::
2337
2338 REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(foo);
2339
2340- Depending on the nature of event, use one of ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros to
2341 publish the event at the appropriate path and time of execution.
2342
2343A subscriber that wants to subscribe to event ``foo`` published above would
2344implement:
2345
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002346.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002347
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002348 void *foo_handler(const void *arg)
2349 {
2350 void *result;
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002351
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002352 /* Do handling ... */
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002353
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002354 return result;
2355 }
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002356
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002357 SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(foo, foo_handler);
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002358
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002359
2360Reclaiming the BL31 initialization code
2361~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2362
2363A significant amount of the code used for the initialization of BL31 is never
2364needed again after boot time. In order to reduce the runtime memory
2365footprint, the memory used for this code can be reclaimed after initialization
2366has finished and be used for runtime data.
2367
2368The build option ``RECLAIM_INIT_CODE`` can be set to mark this boot time code
2369with a ``.text.init.*`` attribute which can be filtered and placed suitably
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002370within the BL image for later reclamation by the platform. The platform can
2371specify the filter and the memory region for this init section in BL31 via the
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002372plat.ld.S linker script. For example, on the FVP, this section is placed
2373overlapping the secondary CPU stacks so that after the cold boot is done, this
2374memory can be reclaimed for the stacks. The init memory section is initially
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002375mapped with ``RO``, ``EXECUTE`` attributes. After BL31 initialization has
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002376completed, the FVP changes the attributes of this section to ``RW``,
2377``EXECUTE_NEVER`` allowing it to be used for runtime data. The memory attributes
2378are changed within the ``bl31_plat_runtime_setup`` platform hook. The init
2379section section can be reclaimed for any data which is accessed after cold
2380boot initialization and it is upto the platform to make the decision.
2381
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002382Performance Measurement Framework
2383---------------------------------
2384
2385The Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) facilitates collection of
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002386timestamps by registered services and provides interfaces to retrieve them
2387from within TF-A. A platform can choose to expose appropriate SMCs to
2388retrieve these collected timestamps.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002389
2390By default, the global physical counter is used for the timestamp
2391value and is read via ``CNTPCT_EL0``. The framework allows to retrieve
2392timestamps captured by other CPUs.
2393
2394Timestamp identifier format
2395~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2396
2397A PMF timestamp is uniquely identified across the system via the
2398timestamp ID or ``tid``. The ``tid`` is composed as follows:
2399
2400::
2401
2402 Bits 0-7: The local timestamp identifier.
2403 Bits 8-9: Reserved.
2404 Bits 10-15: The service identifier.
2405 Bits 16-31: Reserved.
2406
2407#. The service identifier. Each PMF service is identified by a
2408 service name and a service identifier. Both the service name and
2409 identifier are unique within the system as a whole.
2410
2411#. The local timestamp identifier. This identifier is unique within a given
2412 service.
2413
2414Registering a PMF service
2415~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2416
2417To register a PMF service, the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` macro from ``pmf.h``
2418is used. The arguments required are the service name, the service ID,
2419the total number of local timestamps to be captured and a set of flags.
2420
2421The ``flags`` field can be specified as a bitwise-OR of the following values:
2422
2423::
2424
2425 PMF_STORE_ENABLE: The timestamp is stored in memory for later retrieval.
2426 PMF_DUMP_ENABLE: The timestamp is dumped on the serial console.
2427
2428The ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` reserves memory to store captured
2429timestamps in a PMF specific linker section at build time.
2430Additionally, it defines necessary functions to capture and
2431retrieve a particular timestamp for the given service at runtime.
2432
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002433The macro ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` only enables capturing PMF timestamps
2434from within TF-A. In order to retrieve timestamps from outside of TF-A, the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002435``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE_SMC()`` macro must be used instead. This macro
2436accepts the same set of arguments as the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()``
2437macro but additionally supports retrieving timestamps using SMCs.
2438
2439Capturing a timestamp
2440~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2441
2442PMF timestamps are stored in a per-service timestamp region. On a
2443system with multiple CPUs, each timestamp is captured and stored
2444in a per-CPU cache line aligned memory region.
2445
2446Having registered the service, the ``PMF_CAPTURE_TIMESTAMP()`` macro can be
2447used to capture a timestamp at the location where it is used. The macro
2448takes the service name, a local timestamp identifier and a flag as arguments.
2449
2450The ``flags`` field argument can be zero, or ``PMF_CACHE_MAINT`` which
2451instructs PMF to do cache maintenance following the capture. Cache
2452maintenance is required if any of the service's timestamps are captured
2453with data cache disabled.
2454
2455To capture a timestamp in assembly code, the caller should use
2456``pmf_calc_timestamp_addr`` macro (defined in ``pmf_asm_macros.S``) to
2457calculate the address of where the timestamp would be stored. The
2458caller should then read ``CNTPCT_EL0`` register to obtain the timestamp
2459and store it at the determined address for later retrieval.
2460
2461Retrieving a timestamp
2462~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2463
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002464From within TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved using either
2465``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_MPIDR()`` or ``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_INDEX()`` macros.
2466These macros accept the CPU's MPIDR value, or its ordinal position
2467respectively.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002468
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002469From outside TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved by calling
2470into ``pmf_smc_handler()``.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002471
2472.. code:: c
2473
2474 Interface : pmf_smc_handler()
2475 Argument : unsigned int smc_fid, u_register_t x1,
2476 u_register_t x2, u_register_t x3,
2477 u_register_t x4, void *cookie,
2478 void *handle, u_register_t flags
2479 Return : uintptr_t
2480
2481 smc_fid: Holds the SMC identifier which is either `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_32`
2482 when the caller of the SMC is running in AArch32 mode
2483 or `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_64` when the caller is running in AArch64 mode.
2484 x1: Timestamp identifier.
2485 x2: The `mpidr` of the CPU for which the timestamp has to be retrieved.
2486 This can be the `mpidr` of a different core to the one initiating
2487 the SMC. In that case, service specific cache maintenance may be
2488 required to ensure the updated copy of the timestamp is returned.
2489 x3: A flags value that is either 0 or `PMF_CACHE_MAINT`. If
2490 `PMF_CACHE_MAINT` is passed, then the PMF code will perform a
2491 cache invalidate before reading the timestamp. This ensures
2492 an updated copy is returned.
2493
2494The remaining arguments, ``x4``, ``cookie``, ``handle`` and ``flags`` are unused
2495in this implementation.
2496
2497PMF code structure
2498~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2499
2500#. ``pmf_main.c`` consists of core functions that implement service registration,
2501 initialization, storing, dumping and retrieving timestamps.
2502
2503#. ``pmf_smc.c`` contains the SMC handling for registered PMF services.
2504
2505#. ``pmf.h`` contains the public interface to Performance Measurement Framework.
2506
2507#. ``pmf_asm_macros.S`` consists of macros to facilitate capturing timestamps in
2508 assembly code.
2509
2510#. ``pmf_helpers.h`` is an internal header used by ``pmf.h``.
2511
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002512Armv8-A Architecture Extensions
2513-------------------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002514
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002515TF-A makes use of Armv8-A Architecture Extensions where applicable. This
2516section lists the usage of Architecture Extensions, and build flags
2517controlling them.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002518
2519In general, and unless individually mentioned, the build options
Alexei Fedorovfa6f7742019-03-11 16:51:47 +00002520``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` select the Architecture Extension to
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002521target when building TF-A. Subsequent Arm Architecture Extensions are backward
2522compatible with previous versions.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002523
2524The build system only requires that ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` have a
2525valid numeric value. These build options only control whether or not
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002526Architecture Extension-specific code is included in the build. Otherwise, TF-A
2527targets the base Armv8.0-A architecture; i.e. as if ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 8
2528and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` == 0, which are also their respective default values.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002529
2530See also the *Summary of build options* in `User Guide`_.
2531
2532For details on the Architecture Extension and available features, please refer
2533to the respective Architecture Extension Supplement.
2534
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002535Armv8.1-A
2536~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002537
2538This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` >= 8, or when
2539``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 8 and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` >= 1.
2540
2541- The Compare and Swap instruction is used to implement spinlocks. Otherwise,
2542 the load-/store-exclusive instruction pair is used.
2543
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002544Armv8.2-A
2545~~~~~~~~~
Isla Mitchell9fce2722017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002546
Antonio Nino Diazd71446c2019-02-19 13:14:06 +00002547- The presence of ARMv8.2-TTCNP is detected at runtime. When it is present, the
2548 Common not Private (TTBRn_ELx.CnP) bit is enabled to indicate that multiple
Sandrine Bailleux7c0a8432018-01-29 14:48:15 +01002549 Processing Elements in the same Inner Shareable domain use the same
2550 translation table entries for a given stage of translation for a particular
2551 translation regime.
Isla Mitchell9fce2722017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002552
Jeenu Viswambharan3ff4aaa2018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002553Armv8.3-A
2554~~~~~~~~~
2555
Antonio Nino Diaz52839622019-01-31 11:58:00 +00002556- Pointer authentication features of Armv8.3-A are unconditionally enabled in
2557 the Non-secure world so that lower ELs are allowed to use them without
2558 causing a trap to EL3.
2559
2560 In order to enable the Secure world to use it, ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS``
2561 must be set to 1. This will add all pointer authentication system registers
2562 to the context that is saved when doing a world switch.
Jeenu Viswambharan3ff4aaa2018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002563
Alexei Fedorov06715f82019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002564 The TF-A itself has support for pointer authentication at runtime
Antonio Nino Diazb86048c2019-02-19 11:53:51 +00002565 that can be enabled by setting both options ``ENABLE_PAUTH`` and
2566 ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS`` to 1. This enables pointer authentication in BL1,
2567 BL2, BL31, and the TSP if it is used.
2568
Alexei Fedorov06715f82019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002569 These options are experimental features.
2570
2571 Note that Pointer Authentication is enabled for Non-secure world irrespective
2572 of the value of these build flags if the CPU supports it.
2573
Alexei Fedorovfa6f7742019-03-11 16:51:47 +00002574 If ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR == 8`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR >= 3`` the code footprint of
2575 enabling PAuth is lower because the compiler will use the optimized
2576 PAuth instructions rather than the backwards-compatible ones.
2577
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002578Armv7-A
2579~~~~~~~
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002580
2581This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 7.
2582
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002583There are several Armv7-A extensions available. Obviously the TrustZone
2584extension is mandatory to support the TF-A bootloader and runtime services.
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002585
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002586Platform implementing an Armv7-A system can to define from its target
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002587Cortex-A architecture through ``ARM_CORTEX_A<X> = yes`` in their
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002588``platform.mk`` script. For example ``ARM_CORTEX_A15=yes`` for a
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002589Cortex-A15 target.
2590
2591Platform can also set ``ARM_WITH_NEON=yes`` to enable neon support.
2592Note that using neon at runtime has constraints on non secure wolrd context.
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002593TF-A does not yet provide VFP context management.
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002594
2595Directive ``ARM_CORTEX_A<x>`` and ``ARM_WITH_NEON`` are used to set
2596the toolchain target architecture directive.
2597
2598Platform may choose to not define straight the toolchain target architecture
2599directive by defining ``MARCH32_DIRECTIVE``.
2600I.e:
2601
2602::
2603
2604 MARCH32_DIRECTIVE := -mach=armv7-a
2605
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002606Code Structure
2607--------------
2608
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002609TF-A code is logically divided between the three boot loader stages mentioned
2610in the previous sections. The code is also divided into the following
2611categories (present as directories in the source code):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002612
2613- **Platform specific.** Choice of architecture specific code depends upon
2614 the platform.
2615- **Common code.** This is platform and architecture agnostic code.
2616- **Library code.** This code comprises of functionality commonly used by all
2617 other code. The PSCI implementation and other EL3 runtime frameworks reside
2618 as Library components.
2619- **Stage specific.** Code specific to a boot stage.
2620- **Drivers.**
2621- **Services.** EL3 runtime services (eg: SPD). Specific SPD services
2622 reside in the ``services/spd`` directory (e.g. ``services/spd/tspd``).
2623
2624Each boot loader stage uses code from one or more of the above mentioned
2625categories. Based upon the above, the code layout looks like this:
2626
2627::
2628
2629 Directory Used by BL1? Used by BL2? Used by BL31?
2630 bl1 Yes No No
2631 bl2 No Yes No
2632 bl31 No No Yes
2633 plat Yes Yes Yes
2634 drivers Yes No Yes
2635 common Yes Yes Yes
2636 lib Yes Yes Yes
2637 services No No Yes
2638
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002639The build system provides a non configurable build option IMAGE_BLx for each
2640boot loader stage (where x = BL stage). e.g. for BL1 , IMAGE_BL1 will be
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002641defined by the build system. This enables TF-A to compile certain code only
2642for specific boot loader stages
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002643
2644All assembler files have the ``.S`` extension. The linker source files for each
2645boot stage have the extension ``.ld.S``. These are processed by GCC to create the
2646linker scripts which have the extension ``.ld``.
2647
2648FDTs provide a description of the hardware platform and are used by the Linux
2649kernel at boot time. These can be found in the ``fdts`` directory.
2650
2651References
2652----------
2653
Sandrine Bailleuxc1491eb2019-04-24 10:41:24 +02002654.. [#] `Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D)`_
Douglas Raillard668c5022017-06-28 16:14:55 +01002655.. [#] `Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_
2656.. [#] `SMC Calling Convention PDD`_
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002657.. [#] `TF-A Interrupt Management Design guide`_.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002658
2659--------------
2660
Antonio Nino Diazd71446c2019-02-19 13:14:06 +00002661*Copyright (c) 2013-2019, Arm Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.*
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002662
2663.. _Reset Design: ./reset-design.rst
Paul Beesley40d553c2019-02-11 17:54:45 +00002664.. _Porting Guide: ../getting_started/porting-guide.rst
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002665.. _Firmware Update: ./firmware-update.rst
2666.. _PSCI PDD: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
2667.. _SMC calling convention PDD: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0028b/ARM_DEN0028B_SMC_Calling_Convention.pdf
Paul Beesley40d553c2019-02-11 17:54:45 +00002668.. _PSCI Library integration guide: ../getting_started/psci-lib-integration-guide.rst
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002669.. _SMCCC: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0028b/ARM_DEN0028B_SMC_Calling_Convention.pdf
2670.. _PSCI: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
2671.. _Power State Coordination Interface PDD: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
Paul Beesley40d553c2019-02-11 17:54:45 +00002672.. _here: ../getting_started/psci-lib-integration-guide.rst
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002673.. _cpu-specific-build-macros.rst: ./cpu-specific-build-macros.rst
2674.. _CPUBM: ./cpu-specific-build-macros.rst
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002675.. _Arm ARM: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0487a.e/index.html
Paul Beesley40d553c2019-02-11 17:54:45 +00002676.. _User Guide: ../getting_started/user-guide.rst
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002677.. _SMC Calling Convention PDD: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0028b/ARM_DEN0028B_SMC_Calling_Convention.pdf
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002678.. _TF-A Interrupt Management Design guide: ./interrupt-framework-design.rst
Antonio Nino Diaz6feb9e82017-05-23 11:49:22 +01002679.. _Xlat_tables design: xlat-tables-lib-v2-design.rst
Jeenu Viswambharane31d76f2017-10-18 14:30:53 +01002680.. _Exception Handling Framework: exception-handling.rst
Sathees Balyae36950b2019-01-30 15:56:44 +00002681.. _ROMLIB Design: romlib-design.rst
Sandrine Bailleuxc1491eb2019-04-24 10:41:24 +02002682.. _Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D): https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0006/latest/trusted-board-boot-requirements-client-tbbr-client-armv8-a
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002683
2684.. |Image 1| image:: diagrams/rt-svc-descs-layout.png?raw=true