blob: a450588db6f073a18eacc5f7072e5384dd5411b3 [file] [log] [blame]
Paul Beesley8aa05052019-03-07 15:47:15 +00001Firmware Design
2===============
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01003
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00004Trusted Firmware-A (TF-A) implements a subset of the Trusted Board Boot
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01005Requirements (TBBR) Platform Design Document (PDD) for Arm reference
6platforms.
7
8The TBB sequence starts when the platform is powered on and runs up
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01009to the stage where it hands-off control to firmware running in the normal
10world in DRAM. This is the cold boot path.
11
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010012TF-A also implements the `Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_ as a
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000013runtime service. PSCI is the interface from normal world software to firmware
14implementing power management use-cases (for example, secondary CPU boot,
15hotplug and idle). Normal world software can access TF-A runtime services via
16the Arm SMC (Secure Monitor Call) instruction. The SMC instruction must be
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010017used as mandated by the SMC Calling Convention (`SMCCC`_).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010018
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000019TF-A implements a framework for configuring and managing interrupts generated
20in either security state. The details of the interrupt management framework
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010021and its design can be found in :ref:`Interrupt Management Framework`.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010022
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000023TF-A also implements a library for setting up and managing the translation
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010024tables. The details of this library can be found in
25:ref:`Translation (XLAT) Tables Library`.
Antonio Nino Diaz6feb9e82017-05-23 11:49:22 +010026
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000027TF-A can be built to support either AArch64 or AArch32 execution state.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010028
Zelalem Aweke7446c262021-10-21 13:59:45 -050029.. note::
30
31 The descriptions in this chapter are for the Arm TrustZone architecture.
32 For changes to the firmware design for the
33 `Arm Confidential Compute Architecture (Arm CCA)`_ please refer to the
34 chapter :ref:`Realm Management Extension (RME)`.
35
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010036Cold boot
37---------
38
39The cold boot path starts when the platform is physically turned on. If
40``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU=0``, one of the CPUs released from reset is chosen as the
41primary CPU, and the remaining CPUs are considered secondary CPUs. The primary
42CPU is chosen through platform-specific means. The cold boot path is mainly
43executed by the primary CPU, other than essential CPU initialization executed by
44all CPUs. The secondary CPUs are kept in a safe platform-specific state until
45the primary CPU has performed enough initialization to boot them.
46
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010047Refer to the :ref:`CPU Reset` for more information on the effect of the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010048``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU`` platform build option.
49
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000050The cold boot path in this implementation of TF-A depends on the execution
51state. For AArch64, it is divided into five steps (in order of execution):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010052
53- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
54- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
55- Boot Loader stage 3-1 (BL31) *EL3 Runtime Software*
56- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *Secure-EL1 Payload* (optional)
57- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
58
59For AArch32, it is divided into four steps (in order of execution):
60
61- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
62- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
63- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *EL3 Runtime Software*
64- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
65
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000066Arm development platforms (Fixed Virtual Platforms (FVPs) and Juno) implement a
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010067combination of the following types of memory regions. Each bootloader stage uses
68one or more of these memory regions.
69
70- Regions accessible from both non-secure and secure states. For example,
71 non-trusted SRAM, ROM and DRAM.
72- Regions accessible from only the secure state. For example, trusted SRAM and
73 ROM. The FVPs also implement the trusted DRAM which is statically
74 configured. Additionally, the Base FVPs and Juno development platform
75 configure the TrustZone Controller (TZC) to create a region in the DRAM
76 which is accessible only from the secure state.
77
78The sections below provide the following details:
79
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +000080- dynamic configuration of Boot Loader stages
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010081- initialization and execution of the first three stages during cold boot
82- specification of the EL3 Runtime Software (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for
83 AArch32) entrypoint requirements for use by alternative Trusted Boot
84 Firmware in place of the provided BL1 and BL2
85
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +000086Dynamic Configuration during cold boot
87~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
88
89Each of the Boot Loader stages may be dynamically configured if required by the
90platform. The Boot Loader stage may optionally specify a firmware
91configuration file and/or hardware configuration file as listed below:
92
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +010093- FW_CONFIG - The firmware configuration file. Holds properties shared across
94 all BLx images.
95 An example is the "dtb-registry" node, which contains the information about
96 the other device tree configurations (load-address, size, image_id).
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +000097- HW_CONFIG - The hardware configuration file. Can be shared by all Boot Loader
98 stages and also by the Normal World Rich OS.
99- TB_FW_CONFIG - Trusted Boot Firmware configuration file. Shared between BL1
100 and BL2.
101- SOC_FW_CONFIG - SoC Firmware configuration file. Used by BL31.
102- TOS_FW_CONFIG - Trusted OS Firmware configuration file. Used by Trusted OS
103 (BL32).
104- NT_FW_CONFIG - Non Trusted Firmware configuration file. Used by Non-trusted
105 firmware (BL33).
106
107The Arm development platforms use the Flattened Device Tree format for the
108dynamic configuration files.
109
110Each Boot Loader stage can pass up to 4 arguments via registers to the next
111stage. BL2 passes the list of the next images to execute to the *EL3 Runtime
112Software* (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32) via `arg0`. All the other
113arguments are platform defined. The Arm development platforms use the following
114convention:
115
116- BL1 passes the address of a meminfo_t structure to BL2 via ``arg1``. This
117 structure contains the memory layout available to BL2.
118- When dynamic configuration files are present, the firmware configuration for
119 the next Boot Loader stage is populated in the first available argument and
120 the generic hardware configuration is passed the next available argument.
121 For example,
122
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +0100123 - FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` to BL2.
124 - TB_FW_CONFIG address is retrieved by BL2 from FW_CONFIG device tree.
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000125 - If HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg2`` to
126 BL2. Note, ``arg1`` is already used for meminfo_t.
127 - If SOC_FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg1``
128 to BL31. Note, ``arg0`` is used to pass the list of executable images.
129 - Similarly, if HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1 or BL2, then its address is
130 passed in ``arg2`` to BL31.
131 - For other BL3x images, if the firmware configuration file is loaded by
132 BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` and if HW_CONFIG is loaded
133 then its address is passed in ``arg1``.
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +0100134 - In case of the Arm FVP platform, FW_CONFIG address passed in ``arg1`` to
135 BL31/SP_MIN, and the SOC_FW_CONFIG and HW_CONFIG details are retrieved
136 from FW_CONFIG device tree.
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000137
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100138BL1
139~~~
140
141This stage begins execution from the platform's reset vector at EL3. The reset
142address is platform dependent but it is usually located in a Trusted ROM area.
143The BL1 data section is copied to trusted SRAM at runtime.
144
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000145On the Arm development platforms, BL1 code starts execution from the reset
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100146vector defined by the constant ``BL1_RO_BASE``. The BL1 data section is copied
147to the top of trusted SRAM as defined by the constant ``BL1_RW_BASE``.
148
149The functionality implemented by this stage is as follows.
150
151Determination of boot path
152^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
153
154Whenever a CPU is released from reset, BL1 needs to distinguish between a warm
155boot and a cold boot. This is done using platform-specific mechanisms (see the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100156``plat_get_my_entrypoint()`` function in the :ref:`Porting Guide`). In the case
157of a warm boot, a CPU is expected to continue execution from a separate
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100158entrypoint. In the case of a cold boot, the secondary CPUs are placed in a safe
159platform-specific state (see the ``plat_secondary_cold_boot_setup()`` function in
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100160the :ref:`Porting Guide`) while the primary CPU executes the remaining cold boot
161path as described in the following sections.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100162
163This step only applies when ``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS=0``. Refer to the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100164:ref:`CPU Reset` for more information on the effect of the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100165``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS`` platform build option.
166
167Architectural initialization
168^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
169
170BL1 performs minimal architectural initialization as follows.
171
172- Exception vectors
173
174 BL1 sets up simple exception vectors for both synchronous and asynchronous
175 exceptions. The default behavior upon receiving an exception is to populate
176 a status code in the general purpose register ``X0/R0`` and call the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100177 ``plat_report_exception()`` function (see the :ref:`Porting Guide`). The
178 status code is one of:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100179
180 For AArch64:
181
182 ::
183
184 0x0 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
185 0x1 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
186 0x2 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
187 0x3 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
188 0x4 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
189 0x5 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
190 0x6 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
191 0x7 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
192 0x8 : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch64
193 0x9 : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
194 0xa : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
195 0xb : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch64
196 0xc : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch32
197 0xd : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
198 0xe : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
199 0xf : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch32
200
201 For AArch32:
202
203 ::
204
205 0x10 : User mode
206 0x11 : FIQ mode
207 0x12 : IRQ mode
208 0x13 : SVC mode
209 0x16 : Monitor mode
210 0x17 : Abort mode
211 0x1a : Hypervisor mode
212 0x1b : Undefined mode
213 0x1f : System mode
214
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000215 The ``plat_report_exception()`` implementation on the Arm FVP port programs
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100216 the Versatile Express System LED register in the following format to
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +0000217 indicate the occurrence of an unexpected exception:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100218
219 ::
220
221 SYS_LED[0] - Security state (Secure=0/Non-Secure=1)
222 SYS_LED[2:1] - Exception Level (EL3=0x3, EL2=0x2, EL1=0x1, EL0=0x0)
223 For AArch32 it is always 0x0
224 SYS_LED[7:3] - Exception Class (Sync/Async & origin). This is the value
225 of the status code
226
227 A write to the LED register reflects in the System LEDs (S6LED0..7) in the
228 CLCD window of the FVP.
229
230 BL1 does not expect to receive any exceptions other than the SMC exception.
231 For the latter, BL1 installs a simple stub. The stub expects to receive a
232 limited set of SMC types (determined by their function IDs in the general
233 purpose register ``X0/R0``):
234
235 - ``BL1_SMC_RUN_IMAGE``: This SMC is raised by BL2 to make BL1 pass control
236 to EL3 Runtime Software.
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100237 - All SMCs listed in section "BL1 SMC Interface" in the :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)`
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100238 Design Guide are supported for AArch64 only. These SMCs are currently
239 not supported when BL1 is built for AArch32.
240
241 Any other SMC leads to an assertion failure.
242
243- CPU initialization
244
245 BL1 calls the ``reset_handler()`` function which in turn calls the CPU
246 specific reset handler function (see the section: "CPU specific operations
247 framework").
248
249- Control register setup (for AArch64)
250
251 - ``SCTLR_EL3``. Instruction cache is enabled by setting the ``SCTLR_EL3.I``
252 bit. Alignment and stack alignment checking is enabled by setting the
253 ``SCTLR_EL3.A`` and ``SCTLR_EL3.SA`` bits. Exception endianness is set to
254 little-endian by clearing the ``SCTLR_EL3.EE`` bit.
255
256 - ``SCR_EL3``. The register width of the next lower exception level is set
257 to AArch64 by setting the ``SCR.RW`` bit. The ``SCR.EA`` bit is set to trap
258 both External Aborts and SError Interrupts in EL3. The ``SCR.SIF`` bit is
259 also set to disable instruction fetches from Non-secure memory when in
260 secure state.
261
262 - ``CPTR_EL3``. Accesses to the ``CPACR_EL1`` register from EL1 or EL2, or the
263 ``CPTR_EL2`` register from EL2 are configured to not trap to EL3 by
264 clearing the ``CPTR_EL3.TCPAC`` bit. Access to the trace functionality is
265 configured not to trap to EL3 by clearing the ``CPTR_EL3.TTA`` bit.
266 Instructions that access the registers associated with Floating Point
267 and Advanced SIMD execution are configured to not trap to EL3 by
268 clearing the ``CPTR_EL3.TFP`` bit.
269
270 - ``DAIF``. The SError interrupt is enabled by clearing the SError interrupt
271 mask bit.
272
273 - ``MDCR_EL3``. The trap controls, ``MDCR_EL3.TDOSA``, ``MDCR_EL3.TDA`` and
274 ``MDCR_EL3.TPM``, are set so that accesses to the registers they control
275 do not trap to EL3. AArch64 Secure self-hosted debug is disabled by
276 setting the ``MDCR_EL3.SDD`` bit. Also ``MDCR_EL3.SPD32`` is set to
277 disable AArch32 Secure self-hosted privileged debug from S-EL1.
278
279- Control register setup (for AArch32)
280
281 - ``SCTLR``. Instruction cache is enabled by setting the ``SCTLR.I`` bit.
282 Alignment checking is enabled by setting the ``SCTLR.A`` bit.
283 Exception endianness is set to little-endian by clearing the
284 ``SCTLR.EE`` bit.
285
286 - ``SCR``. The ``SCR.SIF`` bit is set to disable instruction fetches from
287 Non-secure memory when in secure state.
288
289 - ``CPACR``. Allow execution of Advanced SIMD instructions at PL0 and PL1,
290 by clearing the ``CPACR.ASEDIS`` bit. Access to the trace functionality
291 is configured not to trap to undefined mode by clearing the
292 ``CPACR.TRCDIS`` bit.
293
294 - ``NSACR``. Enable non-secure access to Advanced SIMD functionality and
295 system register access to implemented trace registers.
296
297 - ``FPEXC``. Enable access to the Advanced SIMD and floating-point
298 functionality from all Exception levels.
299
300 - ``CPSR.A``. The Asynchronous data abort interrupt is enabled by clearing
301 the Asynchronous data abort interrupt mask bit.
302
303 - ``SDCR``. The ``SDCR.SPD`` field is set to disable AArch32 Secure
304 self-hosted privileged debug.
305
306Platform initialization
307^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
308
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000309On Arm platforms, BL1 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100310
311- Enable the Trusted Watchdog.
312- Initialize the console.
313- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
314- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
315- Configure any required platform storage to load the next bootloader image
316 (BL2).
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000317- If the BL1 dynamic configuration file, ``TB_FW_CONFIG``, is available, then
318 load it to the platform defined address and make it available to BL2 via
319 ``arg0``.
Soby Mathew3208edc2018-06-11 16:40:36 +0100320- Configure the system timer and program the `CNTFRQ_EL0` for use by NS-BL1U
321 and NS-BL2U firmware update images.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100322
323Firmware Update detection and execution
324^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
325
326After performing platform setup, BL1 common code calls
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100327``bl1_plat_get_next_image_id()`` to determine if :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` is
328required or to proceed with the normal boot process. If the platform code
329returns ``BL2_IMAGE_ID`` then the normal boot sequence is executed as described
330in the next section, else BL1 assumes that :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` is
331required and execution passes to the first image in the
332:ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` process. In either case, BL1 retrieves a descriptor
333of the next image by calling ``bl1_plat_get_image_desc()``. The image descriptor
334contains an ``entry_point_info_t`` structure, which BL1 uses to initialize the
335execution state of the next image.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100336
337BL2 image load and execution
338^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
339
340In the normal boot flow, BL1 execution continues as follows:
341
342#. BL1 prints the following string from the primary CPU to indicate successful
343 execution of the BL1 stage:
344
345 ::
346
347 "Booting Trusted Firmware"
348
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000349#. BL1 loads a BL2 raw binary image from platform storage, at a
350 platform-specific base address. Prior to the load, BL1 invokes
351 ``bl1_plat_handle_pre_image_load()`` which allows the platform to update or
352 use the image information. If the BL2 image file is not present or if
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100353 there is not enough free trusted SRAM the following error message is
354 printed:
355
356 ::
357
358 "Failed to load BL2 firmware."
359
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000360#. BL1 invokes ``bl1_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` which again is intended
361 for platforms to take further action after image load. This function must
362 populate the necessary arguments for BL2, which may also include the memory
363 layout. Further description of the memory layout can be found later
364 in this document.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100365
366#. BL1 passes control to the BL2 image at Secure EL1 (for AArch64) or at
367 Secure SVC mode (for AArch32), starting from its load address.
368
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100369BL2
370~~~
371
372BL1 loads and passes control to BL2 at Secure-EL1 (for AArch64) or at Secure
373SVC mode (for AArch32) . BL2 is linked against and loaded at a platform-specific
374base address (more information can be found later in this document).
375The functionality implemented by BL2 is as follows.
376
377Architectural initialization
378^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
379
380For AArch64, BL2 performs the minimal architectural initialization required
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000381for subsequent stages of TF-A and normal world software. EL1 and EL0 are given
Peng Fan093ba622020-08-21 10:47:17 +0800382access to Floating Point and Advanced SIMD registers by setting the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000383``CPACR.FPEN`` bits.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100384
385For AArch32, the minimal architectural initialization required for subsequent
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000386stages of TF-A and normal world software is taken care of in BL1 as both BL1
387and BL2 execute at PL1.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100388
389Platform initialization
390^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
391
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000392On Arm platforms, BL2 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100393
394- Initialize the console.
395- Configure any required platform storage to allow loading further bootloader
396 images.
397- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
398- Perform platform security setup to allow access to controlled components.
399- Reserve some memory for passing information to the next bootloader image
400 EL3 Runtime Software and populate it.
401- Define the extents of memory available for loading each subsequent
402 bootloader image.
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000403- If BL1 has passed TB_FW_CONFIG dynamic configuration file in ``arg0``,
404 then parse it.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100405
406Image loading in BL2
407^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
408
Roberto Vargased51b512018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100409BL2 generic code loads the images based on the list of loadable images
410provided by the platform. BL2 passes the list of executable images
411provided by the platform to the next handover BL image.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100412
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000413The list of loadable images provided by the platform may also contain
414dynamic configuration files. The files are loaded and can be parsed as
415needed in the ``bl2_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` function. These
416configuration files can be passed to next Boot Loader stages as arguments
417by updating the corresponding entrypoint information in this function.
418
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100419SCP_BL2 (System Control Processor Firmware) image load
420^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100421
422Some systems have a separate System Control Processor (SCP) for power, clock,
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100423reset and system control. BL2 loads the optional SCP_BL2 image from platform
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100424storage into a platform-specific region of secure memory. The subsequent
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100425handling of SCP_BL2 is platform specific. For example, on the Juno Arm
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100426development platform port the image is transferred into SCP's internal memory
427using the Boot Over MHU (BOM) protocol after being loaded in the trusted SRAM
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100428memory. The SCP executes SCP_BL2 and signals to the Application Processor (AP)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100429for BL2 execution to continue.
430
431EL3 Runtime Software image load
432^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
433
434BL2 loads the EL3 Runtime Software image from platform storage into a platform-
435specific address in trusted SRAM. If there is not enough memory to load the
Roberto Vargased51b512018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100436image or image is missing it leads to an assertion failure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100437
438AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image load
439^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
440
441BL2 loads the optional BL32 image from platform storage into a platform-
442specific region of secure memory. The image executes in the secure world. BL2
443relies on BL31 to pass control to the BL32 image, if present. Hence, BL2
444populates a platform-specific area of memory with the entrypoint/load-address
445of the BL32 image. The value of the Saved Processor Status Register (``SPSR``)
446for entry into BL32 is not determined by BL2, it is initialized by the
447Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (see later) within BL31, which is responsible for
448managing interaction with BL32. This information is passed to BL31.
449
450BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) image load
451^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
452
453BL2 loads the BL33 image (e.g. UEFI or other test or boot software) from
454platform storage into non-secure memory as defined by the platform.
455
456BL2 relies on EL3 Runtime Software to pass control to BL33 once secure state
457initialization is complete. Hence, BL2 populates a platform-specific area of
458memory with the entrypoint and Saved Program Status Register (``SPSR``) of the
459normal world software image. The entrypoint is the load address of the BL33
460image. The ``SPSR`` is determined as specified in Section 5.13 of the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100461`Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_. This information is passed to the
462EL3 Runtime Software.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100463
464AArch64 BL31 (EL3 Runtime Software) execution
465^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
466
467BL2 execution continues as follows:
468
469#. BL2 passes control back to BL1 by raising an SMC, providing BL1 with the
470 BL31 entrypoint. The exception is handled by the SMC exception handler
471 installed by BL1.
472
473#. BL1 turns off the MMU and flushes the caches. It clears the
474 ``SCTLR_EL3.M/I/C`` bits, flushes the data cache to the point of coherency
475 and invalidates the TLBs.
476
477#. BL1 passes control to BL31 at the specified entrypoint at EL3.
478
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000479Running BL2 at EL3 execution level
480~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
481
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000482Some platforms have a non-TF-A Boot ROM that expects the next boot stage
483to execute at EL3. On these platforms, TF-A BL1 is a waste of memory
484as its only purpose is to ensure TF-A BL2 is entered at S-EL1. To avoid
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000485this waste, a special mode enables BL2 to execute at EL3, which allows
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000486a non-TF-A Boot ROM to load and jump directly to BL2. This mode is selected
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000487when the build flag BL2_AT_EL3 is enabled. The main differences in this
488mode are:
489
490#. BL2 includes the reset code and the mailbox mechanism to differentiate
491 cold boot and warm boot. It runs at EL3 doing the arch
492 initialization required for EL3.
493
494#. BL2 does not receive the meminfo information from BL1 anymore. This
495 information can be passed by the Boot ROM or be internal to the
496 BL2 image.
497
498#. Since BL2 executes at EL3, BL2 jumps directly to the next image,
499 instead of invoking the RUN_IMAGE SMC call.
500
501
502We assume 3 different types of BootROM support on the platform:
503
504#. The Boot ROM always jumps to the same address, for both cold
505 and warm boot. In this case, we will need to keep a resident part
506 of BL2 whose memory cannot be reclaimed by any other image. The
507 linker script defines the symbols __TEXT_RESIDENT_START__ and
508 __TEXT_RESIDENT_END__ that allows the platform to configure
509 correctly the memory map.
510#. The platform has some mechanism to indicate the jump address to the
511 Boot ROM. Platform code can then program the jump address with
512 psci_warmboot_entrypoint during cold boot.
513#. The platform has some mechanism to program the reset address using
514 the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS feature. Platform code can then
515 program the reset address with psci_warmboot_entrypoint during
516 cold boot, bypassing the boot ROM for warm boot.
517
518In the last 2 cases, no part of BL2 needs to remain resident at
519runtime. In the first 2 cases, we expect the Boot ROM to be able to
520differentiate between warm and cold boot, to avoid loading BL2 again
521during warm boot.
522
523This functionality can be tested with FVP loading the image directly
524in memory and changing the address where the system jumps at reset.
525For example:
526
Dimitris Papastamos42be6fc2018-06-11 11:07:58 +0100527 -C cluster0.cpu0.RVBAR=0x4022000
528 --data cluster0.cpu0=bl2.bin@0x4022000
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000529
530With this configuration, FVP is like a platform of the first case,
531where the Boot ROM jumps always to the same address. For simplification,
532BL32 is loaded in DRAM in this case, to avoid other images reclaiming
533BL2 memory.
534
535
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100536AArch64 BL31
537~~~~~~~~~~~~
538
539The image for this stage is loaded by BL2 and BL1 passes control to BL31 at
540EL3. BL31 executes solely in trusted SRAM. BL31 is linked against and
541loaded at a platform-specific base address (more information can be found later
542in this document). The functionality implemented by BL31 is as follows.
543
544Architectural initialization
545^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
546
547Currently, BL31 performs a similar architectural initialization to BL1 as
548far as system register settings are concerned. Since BL1 code resides in ROM,
549architectural initialization in BL31 allows override of any previous
550initialization done by BL1.
551
552BL31 initializes the per-CPU data framework, which provides a cache of
553frequently accessed per-CPU data optimised for fast, concurrent manipulation
554on different CPUs. This buffer includes pointers to per-CPU contexts, crash
555buffer, CPU reset and power down operations, PSCI data, platform data and so on.
556
557It then replaces the exception vectors populated by BL1 with its own. BL31
558exception vectors implement more elaborate support for handling SMCs since this
559is the only mechanism to access the runtime services implemented by BL31 (PSCI
560for example). BL31 checks each SMC for validity as specified by the
Sandrine Bailleux71ac9312020-04-17 14:06:52 +0200561`SMC Calling Convention`_ before passing control to the required SMC
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100562handler routine.
563
564BL31 programs the ``CNTFRQ_EL0`` register with the clock frequency of the system
565counter, which is provided by the platform.
566
567Platform initialization
568^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
569
570BL31 performs detailed platform initialization, which enables normal world
571software to function correctly.
572
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000573On Arm platforms, this consists of the following:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100574
575- Initialize the console.
576- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
577- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
578- Initialize the generic interrupt controller.
579- Initialize the power controller device.
580- Detect the system topology.
581
582Runtime services initialization
583^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
584
585BL31 is responsible for initializing the runtime services. One of them is PSCI.
586
587As part of the PSCI initializations, BL31 detects the system topology. It also
588initializes the data structures that implement the state machine used to track
589the state of power domain nodes. The state can be one of ``OFF``, ``RUN`` or
590``RETENTION``. All secondary CPUs are initially in the ``OFF`` state. The cluster
591that the primary CPU belongs to is ``ON``; any other cluster is ``OFF``. It also
592initializes the locks that protect them. BL31 accesses the state of a CPU or
593cluster immediately after reset and before the data cache is enabled in the
594warm boot path. It is not currently possible to use 'exclusive' based spinlocks,
595therefore BL31 uses locks based on Lamport's Bakery algorithm instead.
596
597The runtime service framework and its initialization is described in more
598detail in the "EL3 runtime services framework" section below.
599
600Details about the status of the PSCI implementation are provided in the
601"Power State Coordination Interface" section below.
602
603AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image initialization
604^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
605
606If a BL32 image is present then there must be a matching Secure-EL1 Payload
607Dispatcher (SPD) service (see later for details). During initialization
608that service must register a function to carry out initialization of BL32
609once the runtime services are fully initialized. BL31 invokes such a
610registered function to initialize BL32 before running BL33. This initialization
611is not necessary for AArch32 SPs.
612
613Details on BL32 initialization and the SPD's role are described in the
Paul Beesley43f35ef2019-05-29 13:59:40 +0100614:ref:`firmware_design_sel1_spd` section below.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100615
616BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) execution
617^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
618
619EL3 Runtime Software initializes the EL2 or EL1 processor context for normal-
620world cold boot, ensuring that no secure state information finds its way into
621the non-secure execution state. EL3 Runtime Software uses the entrypoint
622information provided by BL2 to jump to the Non-trusted firmware image (BL33)
623at the highest available Exception Level (EL2 if available, otherwise EL1).
624
625Using alternative Trusted Boot Firmware in place of BL1 & BL2 (AArch64 only)
626~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
627
628Some platforms have existing implementations of Trusted Boot Firmware that
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000629would like to use TF-A BL31 for the EL3 Runtime Software. To enable this
630firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully documented and stable
631interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and BL31.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100632
633Future changes to the BL31 interface will be done in a backwards compatible
634way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently enhanced/
635updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
636
637Required CPU state when calling ``bl31_entrypoint()`` during cold boot
638^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
639
640This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
641
642On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch64
643EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
644
645::
646
647 PSTATE.EL = 3
648 PSTATE.RW = 1
649 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
650 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
651
652X0 and X1 can be used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
653platform code in BL31:
654
655::
656
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000657 X0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100658 X1 : Platform specific information
659
660BL31 zero-init sections (e.g. ``.bss``) should not contain valid data on entry,
661these will be zero filled prior to invoking platform setup code.
662
663Use of the X0 and X1 parameters
664'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
665
666The parameters are platform specific and passed from ``bl31_entrypoint()`` to
667``bl31_early_platform_setup()``. The value of these parameters is never directly
668used by the common BL31 code.
669
670The convention is that ``X0`` conveys information regarding the BL31, BL32 and
671BL33 images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``X1`` can be used for other
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000672platform specific purpose. This convention allows platforms which use TF-A's
673BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform specific information from
674Secure Boot without conflicting with future evolution of TF-A using ``X0`` to
675pass a ``bl31_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100676
677BL31 common and SPD initialization code depends on image and entrypoint
678information about BL33 and BL32, which is provided via BL31 platform APIs.
679This information is required until the start of execution of BL33. This
680information can be provided in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
681the platform code in BL31, or provided in a platform defined memory location
682by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware via the
683Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned out of
684the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then accessed by
685BL31 platform code before the caches are enabled.
686
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000687TF-A's BL2 implementation passes a ``bl31_params`` structure in
688``X0`` and the Arm development platforms interpret this in the BL31 platform
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100689code.
690
691MMU, Data caches & Coherency
692''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
693
694BL31 does not depend on the enabled state of the MMU, data caches or
695interconnect coherency on entry to ``bl31_entrypoint()``. If these are disabled
696on entry, these should be enabled during ``bl31_plat_arch_setup()``.
697
698Data structures used in the BL31 cold boot interface
699''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
700
701These structures are designed to support compatibility and independent
702evolution of the structures and the firmware images. For example, a version of
703BL31 that can interpret the BL3x image information from different versions of
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100704BL2, a platform that uses an extended entry_point_info structure to convey
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100705additional register information to BL31, or a ELF image loader that can convey
706more details about the firmware images.
707
708To support these scenarios the structures are versioned and sized, which enables
709BL31 to detect which information is present and respond appropriately. The
710``param_header`` is defined to capture this information:
711
712.. code:: c
713
714 typedef struct param_header {
715 uint8_t type; /* type of the structure */
716 uint8_t version; /* version of this structure */
717 uint16_t size; /* size of this structure in bytes */
718 uint32_t attr; /* attributes: unused bits SBZ */
719 } param_header_t;
720
721The structures using this format are ``entry_point_info``, ``image_info`` and
722``bl31_params``. The code that allocates and populates these structures must set
723the header fields appropriately, and the ``SET_PARAM_HEAD()`` a macro is defined
724to simplify this action.
725
726Required CPU state for BL31 Warm boot initialization
727^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
728
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000729When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, TF-A provides
730the platform power management code with a Warm boot initialization
731entry-point, to be invoked by the CPU immediately after the reset handler.
732On entry to the Warm boot initialization function the calling CPU must be in
733AArch64 EL3, little-endian data access and all interrupt sources masked:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100734
735::
736
737 PSTATE.EL = 3
738 PSTATE.RW = 1
739 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
740 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
741
742The PSCI implementation will initialize the processor state and ensure that the
743platform power management code is then invoked as required to initialize all
744necessary system, cluster and CPU resources.
745
746AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software entrypoint interface
747~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
748
749To enable this firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully
750documented and stable interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and the
751AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software.
752
753Future changes to the entrypoint interface will be done in a backwards
754compatible way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently
755enhanced/updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
756
757Required CPU state when entering during cold boot
758^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
759
760This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
761
762On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch32
763EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
764
765::
766
767 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
768 SCTLR.EE = 0
769
770R0 and R1 are used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
771platform code in AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software:
772
773::
774
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000775 R0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100776 R1 : Platform specific information
777
778Use of the R0 and R1 parameters
779'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
780
781The parameters are platform specific and the convention is that ``R0`` conveys
782information regarding the BL3x images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``R1``
783can be used for other platform specific purpose. This convention allows
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000784platforms which use TF-A's BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform
785specific information from Secure Boot without conflicting with future
786evolution of TF-A using ``R0`` to pass a ``bl_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100787
788The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software is responsible for entry into BL33. This
789information can be obtained in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
790the AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, or provided in a platform defined memory
791location by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware
792via the Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned
793out of the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then
794accessed by AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software before the caches are enabled.
795
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000796When using AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, the Arm development platforms pass a
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100797``bl_params`` structure in ``R0`` from BL2 to be interpreted by AArch32 EL3 Runtime
798Software platform code.
799
800MMU, Data caches & Coherency
801''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
802
803AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must not depend on the enabled state of the MMU,
804data caches or interconnect coherency in its entrypoint. They must be explicitly
805enabled if required.
806
807Data structures used in cold boot interface
808'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
809
810The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software cold boot interface uses ``bl_params`` instead
811of ``bl31_params``. The ``bl_params`` structure is based on the convention
812described in AArch64 BL31 cold boot interface section.
813
814Required CPU state for warm boot initialization
815^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
816
817When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, AArch32 EL3
818Runtime Software must ensure execution of a warm boot initialization entrypoint.
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100819If TF-A BL1 is used and the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS build flag is false,
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000820then AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must ensure that BL1 branches to the warm
821boot entrypoint by arranging for the BL1 platform function,
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100822plat_get_my_entrypoint(), to return a non-zero value.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100823
824In this case, the warm boot entrypoint must be in AArch32 EL3, little-endian
825data access and all interrupt sources masked:
826
827::
828
829 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
830 SCTLR.EE = 0
831
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000832The warm boot entrypoint may be implemented by using TF-A
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100833``psci_warmboot_entrypoint()`` function. In that case, the platform must fulfil
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100834the pre-requisites mentioned in the
835:ref:`PSCI Library Integration guide for Armv8-A AArch32 systems`.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100836
837EL3 runtime services framework
838------------------------------
839
840Software executing in the non-secure state and in the secure state at exception
841levels lower than EL3 will request runtime services using the Secure Monitor
842Call (SMC) instruction. These requests will follow the convention described in
843the SMC Calling Convention PDD (`SMCCC`_). The `SMCCC`_ assigns function
844identifiers to each SMC request and describes how arguments are passed and
845returned.
846
847The EL3 runtime services framework enables the development of services by
848different providers that can be easily integrated into final product firmware.
849The following sections describe the framework which facilitates the
850registration, initialization and use of runtime services in EL3 Runtime
851Software (BL31).
852
853The design of the runtime services depends heavily on the concepts and
854definitions described in the `SMCCC`_, in particular SMC Function IDs, Owning
855Entity Numbers (OEN), Fast and Yielding calls, and the SMC32 and SMC64 calling
856conventions. Please refer to that document for more detailed explanation of
857these terms.
858
859The following runtime services are expected to be implemented first. They have
860not all been instantiated in the current implementation.
861
862#. Standard service calls
863
864 This service is for management of the entire system. The Power State
865 Coordination Interface (`PSCI`_) is the first set of standard service calls
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000866 defined by Arm (see PSCI section later).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100867
868#. Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher service
869
870 If a system runs a Trusted OS or other Secure-EL1 Payload (SP) then
871 it also requires a *Secure Monitor* at EL3 to switch the EL1 processor
872 context between the normal world (EL1/EL2) and trusted world (Secure-EL1).
873 The Secure Monitor will make these world switches in response to SMCs. The
874 `SMCCC`_ provides for such SMCs with the Trusted OS Call and Trusted
875 Application Call OEN ranges.
876
877 The interface between the EL3 Runtime Software and the Secure-EL1 Payload is
878 not defined by the `SMCCC`_ or any other standard. As a result, each
879 Secure-EL1 Payload requires a specific Secure Monitor that runs as a runtime
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000880 service - within TF-A this service is referred to as the Secure-EL1 Payload
881 Dispatcher (SPD).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100882
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000883 TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and its associated Dispatcher
884 (TSPD). Details of SPD design and TSP/TSPD operation are described in the
Paul Beesley43f35ef2019-05-29 13:59:40 +0100885 :ref:`firmware_design_sel1_spd` section below.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100886
887#. CPU implementation service
888
889 This service will provide an interface to CPU implementation specific
890 services for a given platform e.g. access to processor errata workarounds.
891 This service is currently unimplemented.
892
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000893Additional services for Arm Architecture, SiP and OEM calls can be implemented.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100894Each implemented service handles a range of SMC function identifiers as
895described in the `SMCCC`_.
896
897Registration
898~~~~~~~~~~~~
899
900A runtime service is registered using the ``DECLARE_RT_SVC()`` macro, specifying
901the name of the service, the range of OENs covered, the type of service and
902initialization and call handler functions. This macro instantiates a ``const struct rt_svc_desc`` for the service with these details (see ``runtime_svc.h``).
903This structure is allocated in a special ELF section ``rt_svc_descs``, enabling
904the framework to find all service descriptors included into BL31.
905
906The specific service for a SMC Function is selected based on the OEN and call
907type of the Function ID, and the framework uses that information in the service
908descriptor to identify the handler for the SMC Call.
909
910The service descriptors do not include information to identify the precise set
911of SMC function identifiers supported by this service implementation, the
912security state from which such calls are valid nor the capability to support
91364-bit and/or 32-bit callers (using SMC32 or SMC64). Responding appropriately
914to these aspects of a SMC call is the responsibility of the service
915implementation, the framework is focused on integration of services from
916different providers and minimizing the time taken by the framework before the
917service handler is invoked.
918
919Details of the parameters, requirements and behavior of the initialization and
920call handling functions are provided in the following sections.
921
922Initialization
923~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
924
925``runtime_svc_init()`` in ``runtime_svc.c`` initializes the runtime services
926framework running on the primary CPU during cold boot as part of the BL31
927initialization. This happens prior to initializing a Trusted OS and running
928Normal world boot firmware that might in turn use these services.
929Initialization involves validating each of the declared runtime service
930descriptors, calling the service initialization function and populating the
931index used for runtime lookup of the service.
932
933The BL31 linker script collects all of the declared service descriptors into a
934single array and defines symbols that allow the framework to locate and traverse
935the array, and determine its size.
936
937The framework does basic validation of each descriptor to halt firmware
938initialization if service declaration errors are detected. The framework does
939not check descriptors for the following error conditions, and may behave in an
940unpredictable manner under such scenarios:
941
942#. Overlapping OEN ranges
943#. Multiple descriptors for the same range of OENs and ``call_type``
944#. Incorrect range of owning entity numbers for a given ``call_type``
945
946Once validated, the service ``init()`` callback is invoked. This function carries
947out any essential EL3 initialization before servicing requests. The ``init()``
948function is only invoked on the primary CPU during cold boot. If the service
949uses per-CPU data this must either be initialized for all CPUs during this call,
950or be done lazily when a CPU first issues an SMC call to that service. If
951``init()`` returns anything other than ``0``, this is treated as an initialization
952error and the service is ignored: this does not cause the firmware to halt.
953
954The OEN and call type fields present in the SMC Function ID cover a total of
955128 distinct services, but in practice a single descriptor can cover a range of
956OENs, e.g. SMCs to call a Trusted OS function. To optimize the lookup of a
957service handler, the framework uses an array of 128 indices that map every
958distinct OEN/call-type combination either to one of the declared services or to
959indicate the service is not handled. This ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array is
960populated for all of the OENs covered by a service after the service ``init()``
961function has reported success. So a service that fails to initialize will never
962have it's ``handle()`` function invoked.
963
964The following figure shows how the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` index maps the SMC
965Function ID call type and OEN onto a specific service handler in the
966``rt_svc_descs[]`` array.
967
968|Image 1|
969
Madhukar Pappireddy6844c342020-07-29 09:37:25 -0500970.. _handling-an-smc:
971
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100972Handling an SMC
973~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
974
975When the EL3 runtime services framework receives a Secure Monitor Call, the SMC
976Function ID is passed in W0 from the lower exception level (as per the
977`SMCCC`_). If the calling register width is AArch32, it is invalid to invoke an
978SMC Function which indicates the SMC64 calling convention: such calls are
979ignored and return the Unknown SMC Function Identifier result code ``0xFFFFFFFF``
980in R0/X0.
981
982Bit[31] (fast/yielding call) and bits[29:24] (owning entity number) of the SMC
983Function ID are combined to index into the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array. The
984resulting value might indicate a service that has no handler, in this case the
985framework will also report an Unknown SMC Function ID. Otherwise, the value is
986used as a further index into the ``rt_svc_descs[]`` array to locate the required
987service and handler.
988
989The service's ``handle()`` callback is provided with five of the SMC parameters
990directly, the others are saved into memory for retrieval (if needed) by the
991handler. The handler is also provided with an opaque ``handle`` for use with the
992supporting library for parameter retrieval, setting return values and context
Olivier Deprez0fe7b9f2022-10-11 15:38:27 +0200993manipulation. The ``flags`` parameter indicates the security state of the caller
994and the state of the SVE hint bit per the SMCCCv1.3. The framework finally sets
995up the execution stack for the handler, and invokes the services ``handle()``
996function.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100997
Madhukar Pappireddye34cc0c2019-11-09 23:28:08 -0600998On return from the handler the result registers are populated in X0-X7 as needed
999before restoring the stack and CPU state and returning from the original SMC.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001000
Jeenu Viswambharane31d76f2017-10-18 14:30:53 +01001001Exception Handling Framework
1002----------------------------
1003
johpow01526f2bd2020-07-28 13:07:25 -05001004Please refer to the :ref:`Exception Handling Framework` document.
Jeenu Viswambharane31d76f2017-10-18 14:30:53 +01001005
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001006Power State Coordination Interface
1007----------------------------------
1008
1009TODO: Provide design walkthrough of PSCI implementation.
1010
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001011The PSCI v1.1 specification categorizes APIs as optional and mandatory. All the
1012mandatory APIs in PSCI v1.1, PSCI v1.0 and in PSCI v0.2 draft specification
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001013`Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_ are implemented. The table lists
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001014the PSCI v1.1 APIs and their support in generic code.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001015
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001016An API implementation might have a dependency on platform code e.g. CPU_SUSPEND
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001017requires the platform to export a part of the implementation. Hence the level
1018of support of the mandatory APIs depends upon the support exported by the
1019platform port as well. The Juno and FVP (all variants) platforms export all the
1020required support.
1021
1022+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001023| PSCI v1.1 API | Supported | Comments |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001024+=============================+=============+===============================+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001025| ``PSCI_VERSION`` | Yes | The version returned is 1.1 |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001026+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1027| ``CPU_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
1028+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1029| ``CPU_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
1030+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1031| ``CPU_ON`` | Yes\* | |
1032+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1033| ``AFFINITY_INFO`` | Yes | |
1034+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1035| ``MIGRATE`` | Yes\*\* | |
1036+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1037| ``MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE`` | Yes\*\* | |
1038+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1039| ``MIGRATE_INFO_CPU`` | Yes\*\* | |
1040+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1041| ``SYSTEM_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
1042+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1043| ``SYSTEM_RESET`` | Yes\* | |
1044+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1045| ``PSCI_FEATURES`` | Yes | |
1046+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1047| ``CPU_FREEZE`` | No | |
1048+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1049| ``CPU_DEFAULT_SUSPEND`` | No | |
1050+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1051| ``NODE_HW_STATE`` | Yes\* | |
1052+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1053| ``SYSTEM_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
1054+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1055| ``PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE`` | No | |
1056+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1057| ``PSCI_STAT_RESIDENCY`` | Yes\* | |
1058+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1059| ``PSCI_STAT_COUNT`` | Yes\* | |
1060+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001061| ``SYSTEM_RESET2`` | Yes\* | |
1062+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1063| ``MEM_PROTECT`` | Yes\* | |
1064+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1065| ``MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE`` | Yes\* | |
1066+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001067
1068\*Note : These PSCI APIs require platform power management hooks to be
1069registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1070
1071\*\*Note : These PSCI APIs require appropriate Secure Payload Dispatcher
1072hooks to be registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1073
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001074The PSCI implementation in TF-A is a library which can be integrated with
1075AArch64 or AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software for Armv8-A systems. A guide to
1076integrating PSCI library with AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software can be found
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001077at :ref:`PSCI Library Integration guide for Armv8-A AArch32 systems`.
1078
1079.. _firmware_design_sel1_spd:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001080
1081Secure-EL1 Payloads and Dispatchers
1082-----------------------------------
1083
1084On a production system that includes a Trusted OS running in Secure-EL1/EL0,
1085the Trusted OS is coupled with a companion runtime service in the BL31
1086firmware. This service is responsible for the initialisation of the Trusted
1087OS and all communications with it. The Trusted OS is the BL32 stage of the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001088boot flow in TF-A. The firmware will attempt to locate, load and execute a
1089BL32 image.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001090
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001091TF-A uses a more general term for the BL32 software that runs at Secure-EL1 -
1092the *Secure-EL1 Payload* - as it is not always a Trusted OS.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001093
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001094TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and a Test Secure-EL1 Payload
1095Dispatcher (TSPD) service as an example of how a Trusted OS is supported on a
1096production system using the Runtime Services Framework. On such a system, the
1097Test BL32 image and service are replaced by the Trusted OS and its dispatcher
1098service. The TF-A build system expects that the dispatcher will define the
1099build flag ``NEED_BL32`` to enable it to include the BL32 in the build either
1100as a binary or to compile from source depending on whether the ``BL32`` build
1101option is specified or not.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001102
1103The TSP runs in Secure-EL1. It is designed to demonstrate synchronous
1104communication with the normal-world software running in EL1/EL2. Communication
1105is initiated by the normal-world software
1106
1107- either directly through a Fast SMC (as defined in the `SMCCC`_)
1108
1109- or indirectly through a `PSCI`_ SMC. The `PSCI`_ implementation in turn
1110 informs the TSPD about the requested power management operation. This allows
1111 the TSP to prepare for or respond to the power state change
1112
1113The TSPD service is responsible for.
1114
1115- Initializing the TSP
1116
1117- Routing requests and responses between the secure and the non-secure
1118 states during the two types of communications just described
1119
1120Initializing a BL32 Image
1121~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1122
1123The Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (SPD) service is responsible for initializing
1124the BL32 image. It needs access to the information passed by BL2 to BL31 to do
1125so. This is provided by:
1126
1127.. code:: c
1128
1129 entry_point_info_t *bl31_plat_get_next_image_ep_info(uint32_t);
1130
1131which returns a reference to the ``entry_point_info`` structure corresponding to
1132the image which will be run in the specified security state. The SPD uses this
1133API to get entry point information for the SECURE image, BL32.
1134
1135In the absence of a BL32 image, BL31 passes control to the normal world
1136bootloader image (BL33). When the BL32 image is present, it is typical
1137that the SPD wants control to be passed to BL32 first and then later to BL33.
1138
1139To do this the SPD has to register a BL32 initialization function during
1140initialization of the SPD service. The BL32 initialization function has this
1141prototype:
1142
1143.. code:: c
1144
1145 int32_t init(void);
1146
1147and is registered using the ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` function.
1148
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001149TF-A supports two approaches for the SPD to pass control to BL32 before
1150returning through EL3 and running the non-trusted firmware (BL33):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001151
1152#. In the BL32 setup function, use ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` to
1153 request that the exit from ``bl31_main()`` is to the BL32 entrypoint in
1154 Secure-EL1. BL31 will exit to BL32 using the asynchronous method by
1155 calling ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` and ``el3_exit()``.
1156
1157 When the BL32 has completed initialization at Secure-EL1, it returns to
1158 BL31 by issuing an SMC, using a Function ID allocated to the SPD. On
1159 receipt of this SMC, the SPD service handler should switch the CPU context
1160 from trusted to normal world and use the ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` and
1161 ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` functions to set up the initial return to
1162 the normal world firmware BL33. On return from the handler the framework
1163 will exit to EL2 and run BL33.
1164
1165#. The BL32 setup function registers an initialization function using
1166 ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` which provides a SPD-defined mechanism to
1167 invoke a 'world-switch synchronous call' to Secure-EL1 to run the BL32
1168 entrypoint.
Paul Beesleye1c50262019-03-13 16:20:44 +00001169
1170 .. note::
1171 The Test SPD service included with TF-A provides one implementation
1172 of such a mechanism.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001173
1174 On completion BL32 returns control to BL31 via a SMC, and on receipt the
1175 SPD service handler invokes the synchronous call return mechanism to return
1176 to the BL32 initialization function. On return from this function,
1177 ``bl31_main()`` will set up the return to the normal world firmware BL33 and
1178 continue the boot process in the normal world.
1179
Jeenu Viswambharan579b4ad2017-08-24 15:43:44 +01001180Crash Reporting in BL31
1181-----------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001182
1183BL31 implements a scheme for reporting the processor state when an unhandled
1184exception is encountered. The reporting mechanism attempts to preserve all the
1185register contents and report it via a dedicated UART (PL011 console). BL31
1186reports the general purpose, EL3, Secure EL1 and some EL2 state registers.
1187
1188A dedicated per-CPU crash stack is maintained by BL31 and this is retrieved via
1189the per-CPU pointer cache. The implementation attempts to minimise the memory
1190required for this feature. The file ``crash_reporting.S`` contains the
1191implementation for crash reporting.
1192
1193The sample crash output is shown below.
1194
1195::
1196
Alexei Fedorovb4292bc2020-03-03 13:31:58 +00001197 x0 = 0x000000002a4a0000
1198 x1 = 0x0000000000000001
1199 x2 = 0x0000000000000002
1200 x3 = 0x0000000000000003
1201 x4 = 0x0000000000000004
1202 x5 = 0x0000000000000005
1203 x6 = 0x0000000000000006
1204 x7 = 0x0000000000000007
1205 x8 = 0x0000000000000008
1206 x9 = 0x0000000000000009
1207 x10 = 0x0000000000000010
1208 x11 = 0x0000000000000011
1209 x12 = 0x0000000000000012
1210 x13 = 0x0000000000000013
1211 x14 = 0x0000000000000014
1212 x15 = 0x0000000000000015
1213 x16 = 0x0000000000000016
1214 x17 = 0x0000000000000017
1215 x18 = 0x0000000000000018
1216 x19 = 0x0000000000000019
1217 x20 = 0x0000000000000020
1218 x21 = 0x0000000000000021
1219 x22 = 0x0000000000000022
1220 x23 = 0x0000000000000023
1221 x24 = 0x0000000000000024
1222 x25 = 0x0000000000000025
1223 x26 = 0x0000000000000026
1224 x27 = 0x0000000000000027
1225 x28 = 0x0000000000000028
1226 x29 = 0x0000000000000029
1227 x30 = 0x0000000088000b78
1228 scr_el3 = 0x000000000003073d
1229 sctlr_el3 = 0x00000000b0cd183f
1230 cptr_el3 = 0x0000000000000000
1231 tcr_el3 = 0x000000008080351c
1232 daif = 0x00000000000002c0
1233 mair_el3 = 0x00000000004404ff
1234 spsr_el3 = 0x0000000060000349
1235 elr_el3 = 0x0000000088000114
1236 ttbr0_el3 = 0x0000000004018201
1237 esr_el3 = 0x00000000be000000
1238 far_el3 = 0x0000000000000000
1239 spsr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1240 elr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1241 spsr_abt = 0x0000000000000000
1242 spsr_und = 0x0000000000000000
1243 spsr_irq = 0x0000000000000000
1244 spsr_fiq = 0x0000000000000000
1245 sctlr_el1 = 0x0000000030d00800
1246 actlr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1247 cpacr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1248 csselr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1249 sp_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1250 esr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1251 ttbr0_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1252 ttbr1_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1253 mair_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1254 amair_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1255 tcr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1256 tpidr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1257 tpidr_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1258 tpidrro_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1259 par_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1260 mpidr_el1 = 0x0000000080000000
1261 afsr0_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1262 afsr1_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1263 contextidr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1264 vbar_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1265 cntp_ctl_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1266 cntp_cval_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1267 cntv_ctl_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1268 cntv_cval_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1269 cntkctl_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1270 sp_el0 = 0x0000000004014940
1271 isr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1272 dacr32_el2 = 0x0000000000000000
1273 ifsr32_el2 = 0x0000000000000000
1274 icc_hppir0_el1 = 0x00000000000003ff
1275 icc_hppir1_el1 = 0x00000000000003ff
1276 icc_ctlr_el3 = 0x0000000000080400
1277 gicd_ispendr regs (Offsets 0x200-0x278)
1278 Offset Value
1279 0x200: 0x0000000000000000
1280 0x208: 0x0000000000000000
1281 0x210: 0x0000000000000000
1282 0x218: 0x0000000000000000
1283 0x220: 0x0000000000000000
1284 0x228: 0x0000000000000000
1285 0x230: 0x0000000000000000
1286 0x238: 0x0000000000000000
1287 0x240: 0x0000000000000000
1288 0x248: 0x0000000000000000
1289 0x250: 0x0000000000000000
1290 0x258: 0x0000000000000000
1291 0x260: 0x0000000000000000
1292 0x268: 0x0000000000000000
1293 0x270: 0x0000000000000000
1294 0x278: 0x0000000000000000
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001295
1296Guidelines for Reset Handlers
1297-----------------------------
1298
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001299TF-A implements a framework that allows CPU and platform ports to perform
1300actions very early after a CPU is released from reset in both the cold and warm
1301boot paths. This is done by calling the ``reset_handler()`` function in both
1302the BL1 and BL31 images. It in turn calls the platform and CPU specific reset
1303handling functions.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001304
1305Details for implementing a CPU specific reset handler can be found in
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001306:ref:`firmware_design_cpu_specific_reset_handling`. Details for implementing a
1307platform specific reset handler can be found in the :ref:`Porting Guide` (see
1308the``plat_reset_handler()`` function).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001309
1310When adding functionality to a reset handler, keep in mind that if a different
1311reset handling behavior is required between the first and the subsequent
1312invocations of the reset handling code, this should be detected at runtime.
1313In other words, the reset handler should be able to detect whether an action has
1314already been performed and act as appropriate. Possible courses of actions are,
1315e.g. skip the action the second time, or undo/redo it.
1316
Madhukar Pappireddy6844c342020-07-29 09:37:25 -05001317.. _configuring-secure-interrupts:
1318
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001319Configuring secure interrupts
1320-----------------------------
1321
1322The GIC driver is responsible for performing initial configuration of secure
1323interrupts on the platform. To this end, the platform is expected to provide the
1324GIC driver (either GICv2 or GICv3, as selected by the platform) with the
1325interrupt configuration during the driver initialisation.
1326
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001327Secure interrupt configuration are specified in an array of secure interrupt
1328properties. In this scheme, in both GICv2 and GICv3 driver data structures, the
1329``interrupt_props`` member points to an array of interrupt properties. Each
Antonio Nino Diaz73308612019-02-28 13:35:21 +00001330element of the array specifies the interrupt number and its attributes
1331(priority, group, configuration). Each element of the array shall be populated
1332by the macro ``INTR_PROP_DESC()``. The macro takes the following arguments:
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001333
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001334- 10-bit interrupt number,
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001335
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001336- 8-bit interrupt priority,
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001337
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001338- Interrupt type (one of ``INTR_TYPE_EL3``, ``INTR_TYPE_S_EL1``,
1339 ``INTR_TYPE_NS``),
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001340
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001341- Interrupt configuration (either ``GIC_INTR_CFG_LEVEL`` or
1342 ``GIC_INTR_CFG_EDGE``).
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001343
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001344.. _firmware_design_cpu_ops_fwk:
1345
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001346CPU specific operations framework
1347---------------------------------
1348
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001349Certain aspects of the Armv8-A architecture are implementation defined,
1350that is, certain behaviours are not architecturally defined, but must be
1351defined and documented by individual processor implementations. TF-A
1352implements a framework which categorises the common implementation defined
1353behaviours and allows a processor to export its implementation of that
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001354behaviour. The categories are:
1355
1356#. Processor specific reset sequence.
1357
1358#. Processor specific power down sequences.
1359
1360#. Processor specific register dumping as a part of crash reporting.
1361
1362#. Errata status reporting.
1363
1364Each of the above categories fulfils a different requirement.
1365
1366#. allows any processor specific initialization before the caches and MMU
1367 are turned on, like implementation of errata workarounds, entry into
1368 the intra-cluster coherency domain etc.
1369
1370#. allows each processor to implement the power down sequence mandated in
1371 its Technical Reference Manual (TRM).
1372
1373#. allows a processor to provide additional information to the developer
1374 in the event of a crash, for example Cortex-A53 has registers which
1375 can expose the data cache contents.
1376
1377#. allows a processor to define a function that inspects and reports the status
1378 of all errata workarounds on that processor.
1379
1380Please note that only 2. is mandated by the TRM.
1381
1382The CPU specific operations framework scales to accommodate a large number of
1383different CPUs during power down and reset handling. The platform can specify
1384any CPU optimization it wants to enable for each CPU. It can also specify
1385the CPU errata workarounds to be applied for each CPU type during reset
1386handling by defining CPU errata compile time macros. Details on these macros
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001387can be found in the :ref:`Arm CPU Specific Build Macros` document.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001388
1389The CPU specific operations framework depends on the ``cpu_ops`` structure which
1390needs to be exported for each type of CPU in the platform. It is defined in
1391``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and has the following fields : ``midr``,
1392``reset_func()``, ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` (array of power down functions) and
1393``cpu_reg_dump()``.
1394
1395The CPU specific files in ``lib/cpus`` export a ``cpu_ops`` data structure with
1396suitable handlers for that CPU. For example, ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cortex_a53.S``
1397exports the ``cpu_ops`` for Cortex-A53 CPU. According to the platform
1398configuration, these CPU specific files must be included in the build by
1399the platform makefile. The generic CPU specific operations framework code exists
1400in ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_helpers.S``.
1401
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001402CPU PCS
1403~~~~~~~
1404
1405All assembly functions in CPU files are asked to follow a modified version of
1406the Procedure Call Standard (PCS) in their internals. This is done to ensure
1407calling these functions from outside the file doesn't unexpectedly corrupt
1408registers in the very early environment and to help the internals to be easier
1409to understand. Please see the :ref:`firmware_design_cpu_errata_implementation`
1410for any function specific restrictions.
1411
1412+--------------+---------------------------------+
1413| register | use |
1414+==============+=================================+
1415| x0 - x15 | scratch |
1416+--------------+---------------------------------+
1417| x16, x17 | do not use (used by the linker) |
1418+--------------+---------------------------------+
1419| x18 | do not use (platform register) |
1420+--------------+---------------------------------+
1421| x19 - x28 | callee saved |
1422+--------------+---------------------------------+
1423| x29, x30 | FP, LR |
1424+--------------+---------------------------------+
1425
1426.. _firmware_design_cpu_specific_reset_handling:
1427
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001428CPU specific Reset Handling
1429~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1430
1431After a reset, the state of the CPU when it calls generic reset handler is:
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001432MMU turned off, both instruction and data caches turned off, not part
1433of any coherency domain and no stack.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001434
1435The BL entrypoint code first invokes the ``plat_reset_handler()`` to allow
1436the platform to perform any system initialization required and any system
1437errata workarounds that needs to be applied. The ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` reads
1438the current CPU midr, finds the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry in the ``cpu_ops``
1439array and returns it. Note that only the part number and implementer fields
1440in midr are used to find the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry. The ``reset_func()`` in
1441the returned ``cpu_ops`` is then invoked which executes the required reset
1442handling for that CPU and also any errata workarounds enabled by the platform.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001443
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001444It should be defined using the ``cpu_reset_func_{start,end}`` macros and its
1445body may only clobber x0 to x14 with x14 being the cpu_rev parameter.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001446
1447CPU specific power down sequence
1448~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1449
1450During the BL31 initialization sequence, the pointer to the matching ``cpu_ops``
1451entry is stored in per-CPU data by ``init_cpu_ops()`` so that it can be quickly
1452retrieved during power down sequences.
1453
1454Various CPU drivers register handlers to perform power down at certain power
1455levels for that specific CPU. The PSCI service, upon receiving a power down
1456request, determines the highest power level at which to execute power down
1457sequence for a particular CPU. It uses the ``prepare_cpu_pwr_dwn()`` function to
1458pick the right power down handler for the requested level. The function
1459retrieves ``cpu_ops`` pointer member of per-CPU data, and from that, further
1460retrieves ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` array, and indexes into the required level. If the
1461requested power level is higher than what a CPU driver supports, the handler
1462registered for highest level is invoked.
1463
1464At runtime the platform hooks for power down are invoked by the PSCI service to
1465perform platform specific operations during a power down sequence, for example
1466turning off CCI coherency during a cluster power down.
1467
1468CPU specific register reporting during crash
1469~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1470
1471If the crash reporting is enabled in BL31, when a crash occurs, the crash
1472reporting framework calls ``do_cpu_reg_dump`` which retrieves the matching
1473``cpu_ops`` using ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` function. The ``cpu_reg_dump()`` in
1474``cpu_ops`` is invoked, which then returns the CPU specific register values to
1475be reported and a pointer to the ASCII list of register names in a format
1476expected by the crash reporting framework.
1477
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001478.. _firmware_design_cpu_errata_implementation:
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001479
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001480CPU errata implementation
1481~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001482
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001483Errata workarounds for CPUs supported in TF-A are applied during both cold and
1484warm boots, shortly after reset. Individual Errata workarounds are enabled as
1485build options. Some errata workarounds have potential run-time implications;
1486therefore some are enabled by default, others not. Platform ports shall
1487override build options to enable or disable errata as appropriate. The CPU
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001488drivers take care of applying errata workarounds that are enabled and applicable
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001489to a given CPU.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001490
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001491Each erratum has a build flag in ``lib/cpus/cpu-ops.mk`` of the form:
1492``ERRATA_<cpu_num>_<erratum_id>``. It also has a short description in
1493:ref:`arm_cpu_macros_errata_workarounds` on when it should apply.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001494
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001495Errata framework
1496^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001497
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001498The errata framework is a convention and a small library to allow errata to be
1499automatically discovered. It enables compliant errata to be automatically
1500applied and reported at runtime (either by status reporting or the errata ABI).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001501
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001502To write a compliant mitigation for erratum number ``erratum_id`` on a cpu that
1503declared itself (with ``declare_cpu_ops``) as ``cpu_name`` one needs 3 things:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001504
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001505#. A CPU revision checker function: ``check_erratum_<cpu_name>_<erratum_id>``
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001506
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001507 It should check whether this erratum applies on this revision of this CPU.
1508 It will be called with the CPU revision as its first parameter (x0) and
1509 should return one of ``ERRATA_APPLIES`` or ``ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES``.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001510
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001511 It may only clobber x0 to x4. The rest should be treated as callee-saved.
1512
1513#. A workaround function: ``erratum_<cpu_name>_<erratum_id>_wa``
1514
1515 It should obtain the cpu revision (with ``cpu_get_rev_var``), call its
1516 revision checker, and perform the mitigation, should the erratum apply.
1517
1518 It may only clobber x0 to x8. The rest should be treated as callee-saved.
1519
1520#. Register itself to the framework
1521
1522 Do this with
1523 ``add_erratum_entry <cpu_name>, ERRATUM(<erratum_id>), <errata_flag>``
1524 where the ``errata_flag`` is the enable flag in ``cpu-ops.mk`` described
1525 above.
1526
1527See the next section on how to do this easily.
1528
1529.. note::
1530
1531 CVEs have the format ``CVE_<year>_<number>``. To fit them in the framework, the
1532 ``erratum_id`` for the checker and the workaround functions become the
1533 ``number`` part of its name and the ``ERRATUM(<number>)`` part of the
1534 registration should instead be ``CVE(<year>, <number>)``. In the extremely
1535 unlikely scenario where a CVE and an erratum numbers clash, the CVE number
1536 should be prefixed with a zero.
1537
1538 Also, their build flag should be ``WORKAROUND_CVE_<year>_<number>``.
1539
1540.. note::
1541
1542 AArch32 uses the legacy convention. The checker function has the format
1543 ``check_errata_<erratum_id>`` and the workaround has the format
1544 ``errata_<cpu_number>_<erratum_id>_wa`` where ``cpu_number`` is the shortform
1545 letter and number name of the CPU.
1546
1547 For CVEs the ``erratum_id`` also becomes ``cve_<year>_<number>``.
1548
1549Errata framework helpers
1550^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1551
1552Writing these errata involves lots of boilerplate and repetitive code. On
1553AArch64 there are helpers to omit most of this. They are located in
1554``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and the preferred way to implement
1555errata. Please see their comments on how to use them.
1556
1557The most common type of erratum workaround, one that just sets a "chicken" bit
1558in some arbitrary register, would have an implementation for the Cortex-A77,
1559erratum #1925769 like::
1560
1561 workaround_reset_start cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769), ERRATA_A77_1925769
1562 sysreg_bit_set CORTEX_A77_CPUECTLR_EL1, CORTEX_A77_CPUECTLR_EL1_BIT_8
1563 workaround_reset_end cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769)
1564
1565 check_erratum_ls cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769), CPU_REV(1, 1)
1566
1567Status reporting
1568^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001569
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001570In a debug build of TF-A, on a CPU that comes out of reset, both BL1 and the
Boyan Karatotev5a13a462023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001571runtime firmware (BL31 in AArch64, and BL32 in AArch32) will invoke a generic
1572errata status reporting function. It will read the ``errata_entries`` list of
1573that cpu and will report whether each known erratum was applied and, if not,
1574whether it should have been.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001575
1576Reporting the status of errata workaround is for informational purpose only; it
1577has no functional significance.
1578
1579Memory layout of BL images
1580--------------------------
1581
1582Each bootloader image can be divided in 2 parts:
1583
1584- the static contents of the image. These are data actually stored in the
1585 binary on the disk. In the ELF terminology, they are called ``PROGBITS``
1586 sections;
1587
1588- the run-time contents of the image. These are data that don't occupy any
1589 space in the binary on the disk. The ELF binary just contains some
1590 metadata indicating where these data will be stored at run-time and the
1591 corresponding sections need to be allocated and initialized at run-time.
1592 In the ELF terminology, they are called ``NOBITS`` sections.
1593
1594All PROGBITS sections are grouped together at the beginning of the image,
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001595followed by all NOBITS sections. This is true for all TF-A images and it is
1596governed by the linker scripts. This ensures that the raw binary images are
1597as small as possible. If a NOBITS section was inserted in between PROGBITS
1598sections then the resulting binary file would contain zero bytes in place of
1599this NOBITS section, making the image unnecessarily bigger. Smaller images
1600allow faster loading from the FIP to the main memory.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001601
Samuel Hollandf8578e62018-10-17 21:40:18 -05001602For BL31, a platform can specify an alternate location for NOBITS sections
1603(other than immediately following PROGBITS sections) by setting
1604``SEPARATE_NOBITS_REGION`` to 1 and defining ``BL31_NOBITS_BASE`` and
1605``BL31_NOBITS_LIMIT``.
1606
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001607Linker scripts and symbols
1608~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1609
1610Each bootloader stage image layout is described by its own linker script. The
1611linker scripts export some symbols into the program symbol table. Their values
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001612correspond to particular addresses. TF-A code can refer to these symbols to
1613figure out the image memory layout.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001614
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001615Linker symbols follow the following naming convention in TF-A.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001616
1617- ``__<SECTION>_START__``
1618
1619 Start address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``.
1620
1621- ``__<SECTION>_END__``
1622
1623 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an alignment
1624 constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_END__`` corresponds
1625 to the end address of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the right
1626 boundary. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__`` to know the
1627 actual end address of the section's contents.
1628
1629- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__``
1630
1631 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1632 rounding up due to some alignment constraint.
1633
1634- ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1635
1636 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an
1637 alignment constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1638 corresponds to the size of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the
1639 right boundary. In other words, ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_END__ - _<SECTION>_START__``. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1640 to know the actual size of the section's contents.
1641
1642- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1643
1644 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1645 rounding up due to some alignment constraint. In other words,
1646 ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__ - __<SECTION>_START__``.
1647
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001648Some of the linker symbols are mandatory as TF-A code relies on them to be
1649defined. They are listed in the following subsections. Some of them must be
1650provided for each bootloader stage and some are specific to a given bootloader
1651stage.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001652
1653The linker scripts define some extra, optional symbols. They are not actually
1654used by any code but they help in understanding the bootloader images' memory
1655layout as they are easy to spot in the link map files.
1656
1657Common linker symbols
1658^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1659
1660All BL images share the following requirements:
1661
1662- The BSS section must be zero-initialised before executing any C code.
1663- The coherent memory section (if enabled) must be zero-initialised as well.
1664- The MMU setup code needs to know the extents of the coherent and read-only
1665 memory regions to set the right memory attributes. When
1666 ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA=1``, it needs to know more specifically how the
1667 read-only memory region is divided between code and data.
1668
1669The following linker symbols are defined for this purpose:
1670
1671- ``__BSS_START__``
1672- ``__BSS_SIZE__``
1673- ``__COHERENT_RAM_START__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1674- ``__COHERENT_RAM_END__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1675- ``__COHERENT_RAM_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1676- ``__RO_START__``
1677- ``__RO_END__``
1678- ``__TEXT_START__``
1679- ``__TEXT_END__``
1680- ``__RODATA_START__``
1681- ``__RODATA_END__``
1682
1683BL1's linker symbols
1684^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1685
1686BL1 being the ROM image, it has additional requirements. BL1 resides in ROM and
1687it is entirely executed in place but it needs some read-write memory for its
1688mutable data. Its ``.data`` section (i.e. its allocated read-write data) must be
1689relocated from ROM to RAM before executing any C code.
1690
1691The following additional linker symbols are defined for BL1:
1692
1693- ``__BL1_ROM_END__`` End address of BL1's ROM contents, covering its code
1694 and ``.data`` section in ROM.
1695- ``__DATA_ROM_START__`` Start address of the ``.data`` section in ROM. Must be
1696 aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1697- ``__DATA_RAM_START__`` Address in RAM where the ``.data`` section should be
1698 copied over. Must be aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1699- ``__DATA_SIZE__`` Size of the ``.data`` section (in ROM or RAM).
1700- ``__BL1_RAM_START__`` Start address of BL1 read-write data.
1701- ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` End address of BL1 read-write data.
1702
1703How to choose the right base addresses for each bootloader stage image
1704~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1705
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001706There is currently no support for dynamic image loading in TF-A. This means
1707that all bootloader images need to be linked against their ultimate runtime
1708locations and the base addresses of each image must be chosen carefully such
1709that images don't overlap each other in an undesired way. As the code grows,
1710the base addresses might need adjustments to cope with the new memory layout.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001711
1712The memory layout is completely specific to the platform and so there is no
1713general recipe for choosing the right base addresses for each bootloader image.
1714However, there are tools to aid in understanding the memory layout. These are
1715the link map files: ``build/<platform>/<build-type>/bl<x>/bl<x>.map``, with ``<x>``
1716being the stage bootloader. They provide a detailed view of the memory usage of
1717each image. Among other useful information, they provide the end address of
1718each image.
1719
1720- ``bl1.map`` link map file provides ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` address.
1721- ``bl2.map`` link map file provides ``__BL2_END__`` address.
1722- ``bl31.map`` link map file provides ``__BL31_END__`` address.
1723- ``bl32.map`` link map file provides ``__BL32_END__`` address.
1724
1725For each bootloader image, the platform code must provide its start address
1726as well as a limit address that it must not overstep. The latter is used in the
1727linker scripts to check that the image doesn't grow past that address. If that
1728happens, the linker will issue a message similar to the following:
1729
1730::
1731
1732 aarch64-none-elf-ld: BLx has exceeded its limit.
1733
1734Additionally, if the platform memory layout implies some image overlaying like
1735on FVP, BL31 and TSP need to know the limit address that their PROGBITS
1736sections must not overstep. The platform code must provide those.
1737
Soby Mathew509af922018-09-27 16:46:41 +01001738TF-A does not provide any mechanism to verify at boot time that the memory
1739to load a new image is free to prevent overwriting a previously loaded image.
1740The platform must specify the memory available in the system for all the
1741relevant BL images to be loaded.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001742
1743For example, in the case of BL1 loading BL2, ``bl1_plat_sec_mem_layout()`` will
1744return the region defined by the platform where BL1 intends to load BL2. The
1745``load_image()`` function performs bounds check for the image size based on the
1746base and maximum image size provided by the platforms. Platforms must take
1747this behaviour into account when defining the base/size for each of the images.
1748
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001749Memory layout on Arm development platforms
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001750^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1751
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001752The following list describes the memory layout on the Arm development platforms:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001753
1754- A 4KB page of shared memory is used for communication between Trusted
1755 Firmware and the platform's power controller. This is located at the base of
1756 Trusted SRAM. The amount of Trusted SRAM available to load the bootloader
1757 images is reduced by the size of the shared memory.
1758
1759 The shared memory is used to store the CPUs' entrypoint mailbox. On Juno,
1760 this is also used for the MHU payload when passing messages to and from the
1761 SCP.
1762
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001763- Another 4 KB page is reserved for passing memory layout between BL1 and BL2
1764 and also the dynamic firmware configurations.
1765
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001766- On FVP, BL1 is originally sitting in the Trusted ROM at address ``0x0``. On
1767 Juno, BL1 resides in flash memory at address ``0x0BEC0000``. BL1 read-write
1768 data are relocated to the top of Trusted SRAM at runtime.
1769
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001770- BL2 is loaded below BL1 RW
1771
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001772- EL3 Runtime Software, BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32 (e.g. SP_MIN),
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001773 is loaded at the top of the Trusted SRAM, such that its NOBITS sections will
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001774 overwrite BL1 R/W data and BL2. This implies that BL1 global variables
1775 remain valid only until execution reaches the EL3 Runtime Software entry
1776 point during a cold boot.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001777
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001778- On Juno, SCP_BL2 is loaded temporarily into the EL3 Runtime Software memory
Paul Beesleybe653a62019-10-04 16:17:46 +00001779 region and transferred to the SCP before being overwritten by EL3 Runtime
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001780 Software.
1781
1782- BL32 (for AArch64) can be loaded in one of the following locations:
1783
1784 - Trusted SRAM
1785 - Trusted DRAM (FVP only)
1786 - Secure region of DRAM (top 16MB of DRAM configured by the TrustZone
1787 controller)
1788
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001789 When BL32 (for AArch64) is loaded into Trusted SRAM, it is loaded below
1790 BL31.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001791
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001792The location of the BL32 image will result in different memory maps. This is
1793illustrated for both FVP and Juno in the following diagrams, using the TSP as
1794an example.
1795
Paul Beesleye1c50262019-03-13 16:20:44 +00001796.. note::
1797 Loading the BL32 image in TZC secured DRAM doesn't change the memory
1798 layout of the other images in Trusted SRAM.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001799
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001800CONFIG section in memory layouts shown below contains:
1801
1802::
1803
1804 +--------------------+
1805 |bl2_mem_params_descs|
1806 |--------------------|
1807 | fw_configs |
1808 +--------------------+
1809
1810``bl2_mem_params_descs`` contains parameters passed from BL2 to next the
1811BL image during boot.
1812
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001813``fw_configs`` includes soc_fw_config, tos_fw_config, tb_fw_config and fw_config.
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001814
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001815**FVP with TSP in Trusted SRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001816(These diagrams only cover the AArch64 case)
1817
1818::
1819
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001820 DRAM
1821 0xffffffff +----------+
1822 : :
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001823 0x82100000 |----------|
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001824 |HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001825 0x82000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001826 | |
1827 0x80000000 +----------+
1828
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001829 Trusted DRAM
1830 0x08000000 +----------+
1831 |HW_CONFIG |
1832 0x07f00000 |----------|
1833 : :
1834 | |
1835 0x06000000 +----------+
1836
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001837 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001838 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1839 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1840 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1841 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001842 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1843 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001844 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1845 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001846 0x04003000 +----------+ +----------------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001847 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001848 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001849 | Shared |
1850 0x04000000 +----------+
1851
1852 Trusted ROM
1853 0x04000000 +----------+
1854 | BL1 (ro) |
1855 0x00000000 +----------+
1856
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001857**FVP with TSP in Trusted DRAM with firmware configs (default option):**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001858
1859::
1860
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001861 DRAM
1862 0xffffffff +--------------+
1863 : :
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001864 0x82100000 |--------------|
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001865 | HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001866 0x82000000 |--------------| (non-secure)
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001867 | |
1868 0x80000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001869
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001870 Trusted DRAM
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001871 0x08000000 +--------------+
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001872 | HW_CONFIG |
1873 0x07f00000 |--------------|
1874 : :
1875 | BL32 |
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001876 0x06000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001877
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001878 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001879 0x04040000 +--------------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1880 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1881 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1882 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001883 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1884 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001885 | | +----------------+
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001886 0x04003000 +--------------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001887 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001888 0x04001000 +--------------+
1889 | Shared |
1890 0x04000000 +--------------+
1891
1892 Trusted ROM
1893 0x04000000 +--------------+
1894 | BL1 (ro) |
1895 0x00000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001896
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001897**FVP with TSP in TZC-Secured DRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001898
1899::
1900
1901 DRAM
1902 0xffffffff +----------+
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001903 | BL32 | (secure)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001904 0xff000000 +----------+
1905 | |
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001906 0x82100000 |----------|
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001907 |HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001908 0x82000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001909 | |
1910 0x80000000 +----------+
1911
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001912 Trusted DRAM
1913 0x08000000 +----------+
1914 |HW_CONFIG |
1915 0x7f000000 |----------|
1916 : :
1917 | |
1918 0x06000000 +----------+
1919
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001920 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001921 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1922 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1923 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1924 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001925 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1926 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001927 | | +----------------+
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001928 0x04003000 +----------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001929 | CONFIG |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001930 0x04001000 +----------+
1931 | Shared |
1932 0x04000000 +----------+
1933
1934 Trusted ROM
1935 0x04000000 +----------+
1936 | BL1 (ro) |
1937 0x00000000 +----------+
1938
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001939**Juno with BL32 in Trusted SRAM :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001940
1941::
1942
1943 Flash0
1944 0x0C000000 +----------+
1945 : :
1946 0x0BED0000 |----------|
1947 | BL1 (ro) |
1948 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
1949 : :
1950 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
1951 after SCP_BL2 has
1952 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001953 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1954 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1955 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1956 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001957 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1958 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Chris Kayddc93cb2020-03-12 13:50:26 +00001959 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001960 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
1961 | | +----------------+
1962 | |
1963 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001964 | MHU |
1965 0x04000000 +----------+
1966
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001967**Juno with BL32 in TZC-secured DRAM :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001968
1969::
1970
1971 DRAM
1972 0xFFE00000 +----------+
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001973 | BL32 | (secure)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001974 0xFF000000 |----------|
1975 | |
1976 : : (non-secure)
1977 | |
1978 0x80000000 +----------+
1979
1980 Flash0
1981 0x0C000000 +----------+
1982 : :
1983 0x0BED0000 |----------|
1984 | BL1 (ro) |
1985 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
1986 : :
1987 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
1988 after SCP_BL2 has
1989 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001990 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1991 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1992 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1993 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001994 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1995 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Chris Kayddc93cb2020-03-12 13:50:26 +00001996 | | +----------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001997 0x04001000 +----------+
1998 | MHU |
1999 0x04000000 +----------+
2000
Paul Beesley43f35ef2019-05-29 13:59:40 +01002001.. _firmware_design_fip:
Sathees Balyae36950b2019-01-30 15:56:44 +00002002
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002003Firmware Image Package (FIP)
2004----------------------------
2005
2006Using a Firmware Image Package (FIP) allows for packing bootloader images (and
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002007potentially other payloads) into a single archive that can be loaded by TF-A
2008from non-volatile platform storage. A driver to load images from a FIP has
2009been added to the storage layer and allows a package to be read from supported
2010platform storage. A tool to create Firmware Image Packages is also provided
2011and described below.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002012
2013Firmware Image Package layout
2014~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2015
2016The FIP layout consists of a table of contents (ToC) followed by payload data.
2017The ToC itself has a header followed by one or more table entries. The ToC is
Jett Zhou4069fb52017-11-24 16:03:58 +08002018terminated by an end marker entry, and since the size of the ToC is 0 bytes,
2019the offset equals the total size of the FIP file. All ToC entries describe some
2020payload data that has been appended to the end of the binary package. With the
2021information provided in the ToC entry the corresponding payload data can be
2022retrieved.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002023
2024::
2025
2026 ------------------
2027 | ToC Header |
2028 |----------------|
2029 | ToC Entry 0 |
2030 |----------------|
2031 | ToC Entry 1 |
2032 |----------------|
2033 | ToC End Marker |
2034 |----------------|
2035 | |
2036 | Data 0 |
2037 | |
2038 |----------------|
2039 | |
2040 | Data 1 |
2041 | |
2042 ------------------
2043
2044The ToC header and entry formats are described in the header file
2045``include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h``. This file is used by both the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002046tool and TF-A.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002047
2048The ToC header has the following fields:
2049
2050::
2051
2052 `name`: The name of the ToC. This is currently used to validate the header.
2053 `serial_number`: A non-zero number provided by the creation tool
2054 `flags`: Flags associated with this data.
2055 Bits 0-31: Reserved
2056 Bits 32-47: Platform defined
2057 Bits 48-63: Reserved
2058
2059A ToC entry has the following fields:
2060
2061::
2062
2063 `uuid`: All files are referred to by a pre-defined Universally Unique
2064 IDentifier [UUID] . The UUIDs are defined in
2065 `include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h`. The platform translates
2066 the requested image name into the corresponding UUID when accessing the
2067 package.
2068 `offset_address`: The offset address at which the corresponding payload data
2069 can be found. The offset is calculated from the ToC base address.
2070 `size`: The size of the corresponding payload data in bytes.
Etienne Carriered591d762017-08-23 15:43:33 +02002071 `flags`: Flags associated with this entry. None are yet defined.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002072
2073Firmware Image Package creation tool
2074~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2075
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002076The FIP creation tool can be used to pack specified images into a binary
2077package that can be loaded by TF-A from platform storage. The tool currently
2078only supports packing bootloader images. Additional image definitions can be
2079added to the tool as required.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002080
2081The tool can be found in ``tools/fiptool``.
2082
2083Loading from a Firmware Image Package (FIP)
2084~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2085
2086The Firmware Image Package (FIP) driver can load images from a binary package on
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002087non-volatile platform storage. For the Arm development platforms, this is
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002088currently NOR FLASH.
2089
2090Bootloader images are loaded according to the platform policy as specified by
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002091the function ``plat_get_image_source()``. For the Arm development platforms, this
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002092means the platform will attempt to load images from a Firmware Image Package
2093located at the start of NOR FLASH0.
2094
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002095The Arm development platforms' policy is to only allow loading of a known set of
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002096images. The platform policy can be modified to allow additional images.
2097
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002098Use of coherent memory in TF-A
2099------------------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002100
2101There might be loss of coherency when physical memory with mismatched
2102shareability, cacheability and memory attributes is accessed by multiple CPUs
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002103(refer to section B2.9 of `Arm ARM`_ for more details). This possibility occurs
2104in TF-A during power up/down sequences when coherency, MMU and caches are
2105turned on/off incrementally.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002106
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002107TF-A defines coherent memory as a region of memory with Device nGnRE attributes
2108in the translation tables. The translation granule size in TF-A is 4KB. This
2109is the smallest possible size of the coherent memory region.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002110
2111By default, all data structures which are susceptible to accesses with
2112mismatched attributes from various CPUs are allocated in a coherent memory
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002113region (refer to section 2.1 of :ref:`Porting Guide`). The coherent memory
2114region accesses are Outer Shareable, non-cacheable and they can be accessed with
2115the Device nGnRE attributes when the MMU is turned on. Hence, at the expense of
2116at least an extra page of memory, TF-A is able to work around coherency issues
2117due to mismatched memory attributes.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002118
2119The alternative to the above approach is to allocate the susceptible data
2120structures in Normal WriteBack WriteAllocate Inner shareable memory. This
2121approach requires the data structures to be designed so that it is possible to
2122work around the issue of mismatched memory attributes by performing software
2123cache maintenance on them.
2124
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002125Disabling the use of coherent memory in TF-A
2126~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002127
2128It might be desirable to avoid the cost of allocating coherent memory on
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002129platforms which are memory constrained. TF-A enables inclusion of coherent
2130memory in firmware images through the build flag ``USE_COHERENT_MEM``.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002131This flag is enabled by default. It can be disabled to choose the second
2132approach described above.
2133
2134The below sections analyze the data structures allocated in the coherent memory
2135region and the changes required to allocate them in normal memory.
2136
2137Coherent memory usage in PSCI implementation
2138~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2139
2140The ``psci_non_cpu_pd_nodes`` data structure stores the platform's power domain
2141tree information for state management of power domains. By default, this data
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002142structure is allocated in the coherent memory region in TF-A because it can be
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002143accessed by multiple CPUs, either with caches enabled or disabled.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002144
2145.. code:: c
2146
2147 typedef struct non_cpu_pwr_domain_node {
2148 /*
2149 * Index of the first CPU power domain node level 0 which has this node
2150 * as its parent.
2151 */
2152 unsigned int cpu_start_idx;
2153
2154 /*
2155 * Number of CPU power domains which are siblings of the domain indexed
2156 * by 'cpu_start_idx' i.e. all the domains in the range 'cpu_start_idx
2157 * -> cpu_start_idx + ncpus' have this node as their parent.
2158 */
2159 unsigned int ncpus;
2160
2161 /*
2162 * Index of the parent power domain node.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002163 */
2164 unsigned int parent_node;
2165
2166 plat_local_state_t local_state;
2167
2168 unsigned char level;
2169
2170 /* For indexing the psci_lock array*/
2171 unsigned char lock_index;
2172 } non_cpu_pd_node_t;
2173
2174In order to move this data structure to normal memory, the use of each of its
2175fields must be analyzed. Fields like ``cpu_start_idx``, ``ncpus``, ``parent_node``
2176``level`` and ``lock_index`` are only written once during cold boot. Hence removing
2177them from coherent memory involves only doing a clean and invalidate of the
2178cache lines after these fields are written.
2179
2180The field ``local_state`` can be concurrently accessed by multiple CPUs in
2181different cache states. A Lamport's Bakery lock ``psci_locks`` is used to ensure
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002182mutual exclusion to this field and a clean and invalidate is needed after it
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002183is written.
2184
2185Bakery lock data
2186~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2187
2188The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_lock_t`` is allocated in coherent memory
2189and is accessed by multiple CPUs with mismatched attributes. ``bakery_lock_t`` is
2190defined as follows:
2191
2192.. code:: c
2193
2194 typedef struct bakery_lock {
2195 /*
2196 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2197 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2198 * choosing its bakery number.
2199 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2200 */
2201 volatile uint16_t lock_data[BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS];
2202 } bakery_lock_t;
2203
2204It is a characteristic of Lamport's Bakery algorithm that the volatile per-CPU
2205fields can be read by all CPUs but only written to by the owning CPU.
2206
2207Depending upon the data cache line size, the per-CPU fields of the
2208``bakery_lock_t`` structure for multiple CPUs may exist on a single cache line.
2209These per-CPU fields can be read and written during lock contention by multiple
2210CPUs with mismatched memory attributes. Since these fields are a part of the
2211lock implementation, they do not have access to any other locking primitive to
2212safeguard against the resulting coherency issues. As a result, simple software
2213cache maintenance is not enough to allocate them in coherent memory. Consider
2214the following example.
2215
2216CPU0 updates its per-CPU field with data cache enabled. This write updates a
2217local cache line which contains a copy of the fields for other CPUs as well. Now
2218CPU1 updates its per-CPU field of the ``bakery_lock_t`` structure with data cache
2219disabled. CPU1 then issues a DCIVAC operation to invalidate any stale copies of
2220its field in any other cache line in the system. This operation will invalidate
2221the update made by CPU0 as well.
2222
2223To use bakery locks when ``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled, the lock data structure
2224has been redesigned. The changes utilise the characteristic of Lamport's Bakery
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002225algorithm mentioned earlier. The bakery_lock structure only allocates the memory
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002226for a single CPU. The macro ``DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`` allocates all the bakery locks
2227needed for a CPU into a section ``bakery_lock``. The linker allocates the memory
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002228for other cores by using the total size allocated for the bakery_lock section
2229and multiplying it with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). This enables software to
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002230perform software cache maintenance on the lock data structure without running
2231into coherency issues associated with mismatched attributes.
2232
2233The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_info_t`` is defined for use when
2234``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled as follows:
2235
2236.. code:: c
2237
2238 typedef struct bakery_info {
2239 /*
2240 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2241 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2242 * choosing its bakery number.
2243 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2244 */
2245 volatile uint16_t lock_data;
2246 } bakery_info_t;
2247
2248The ``bakery_info_t`` represents a single per-CPU field of one lock and
2249the combination of corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` structures for all CPUs in the
2250system represents the complete bakery lock. The view in memory for a system
2251with n bakery locks are:
2252
2253::
2254
2255 bakery_lock section start
2256 |----------------|
2257 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2258 | Lock_0 | for CPU0
2259 |----------------|
2260 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2261 | Lock_1 | for CPU0
2262 |----------------|
2263 | .... |
2264 |----------------|
2265 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2266 | Lock_N | for CPU0
2267 ------------------
2268 | XXXXX |
2269 | Padding to |
2270 | next Cache WB | <--- Calculate PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE, allocate
2271 | Granule | continuous memory for remaining CPUs.
2272 ------------------
2273 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2274 | Lock_0 | for CPU1
2275 |----------------|
2276 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2277 | Lock_1 | for CPU1
2278 |----------------|
2279 | .... |
2280 |----------------|
2281 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2282 | Lock_N | for CPU1
2283 ------------------
2284 | XXXXX |
2285 | Padding to |
2286 | next Cache WB |
2287 | Granule |
2288 ------------------
2289
2290Consider a system of 2 CPUs with 'N' bakery locks as shown above. For an
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002291operation on Lock_N, the corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` in both CPU0 and CPU1
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002292``bakery_lock`` section need to be fetched and appropriate cache operations need
2293to be performed for each access.
2294
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002295On Arm Platforms, bakery locks are used in psci (``psci_locks``) and power controller
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002296driver (``arm_lock``).
2297
2298Non Functional Impact of removing coherent memory
2299~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2300
2301Removal of the coherent memory region leads to the additional software overhead
2302of performing cache maintenance for the affected data structures. However, since
2303the memory where the data structures are allocated is cacheable, the overhead is
2304mostly mitigated by an increase in performance.
2305
2306There is however a performance impact for bakery locks, due to:
2307
2308- Additional cache maintenance operations, and
2309- Multiple cache line reads for each lock operation, since the bakery locks
2310 for each CPU are distributed across different cache lines.
2311
2312The implementation has been optimized to minimize this additional overhead.
2313Measurements indicate that when bakery locks are allocated in Normal memory, the
2314minimum latency of acquiring a lock is on an average 3-4 micro seconds whereas
2315in Device memory the same is 2 micro seconds. The measurements were done on the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002316Juno Arm development platform.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002317
2318As mentioned earlier, almost a page of memory can be saved by disabling
2319``USE_COHERENT_MEM``. Each platform needs to consider these trade-offs to decide
2320whether coherent memory should be used. If a platform disables
2321``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` and needs to use bakery locks in the porting layer, it can
2322optionally define macro ``PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE`` (see the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002323:ref:`Porting Guide`). Refer to the reference platform code for examples.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002324
2325Isolating code and read-only data on separate memory pages
2326----------------------------------------------------------
2327
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002328In the Armv8-A VMSA, translation table entries include fields that define the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002329properties of the target memory region, such as its access permissions. The
2330smallest unit of memory that can be addressed by a translation table entry is
2331a memory page. Therefore, if software needs to set different permissions on two
2332memory regions then it needs to map them using different memory pages.
2333
2334The default memory layout for each BL image is as follows:
2335
2336::
2337
2338 | ... |
2339 +-------------------+
2340 | Read-write data |
2341 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2342 | <Padding> |
2343 +-------------------+
2344 | Exception vectors |
2345 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2346 | <Padding> |
2347 +-------------------+
2348 | Read-only data |
2349 +-------------------+
2350 | Code |
2351 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2352
Paul Beesleye1c50262019-03-13 16:20:44 +00002353.. note::
2354 The 2KB alignment for the exception vectors is an architectural
2355 requirement.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002356
2357The read-write data start on a new memory page so that they can be mapped with
2358read-write permissions, whereas the code and read-only data below are configured
2359as read-only.
2360
2361However, the read-only data are not aligned on a page boundary. They are
2362contiguous to the code. Therefore, the end of the code section and the beginning
2363of the read-only data one might share a memory page. This forces both to be
2364mapped with the same memory attributes. As the code needs to be executable, this
2365means that the read-only data stored on the same memory page as the code are
2366executable as well. This could potentially be exploited as part of a security
2367attack.
2368
2369TF provides the build flag ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA`` to isolate the code and
2370read-only data on separate memory pages. This in turn allows independent control
2371of the access permissions for the code and read-only data. In this case,
2372platform code gets a finer-grained view of the image layout and can
2373appropriately map the code region as executable and the read-only data as
2374execute-never.
2375
2376This has an impact on memory footprint, as padding bytes need to be introduced
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002377between the code and read-only data to ensure the segregation of the two. To
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002378limit the memory cost, this flag also changes the memory layout such that the
2379code and exception vectors are now contiguous, like so:
2380
2381::
2382
2383 | ... |
2384 +-------------------+
2385 | Read-write data |
2386 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2387 | <Padding> |
2388 +-------------------+
2389 | Read-only data |
2390 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2391 | <Padding> |
2392 +-------------------+
2393 | Exception vectors |
2394 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2395 | <Padding> |
2396 +-------------------+
2397 | Code |
2398 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2399
2400With this more condensed memory layout, the separation of read-only data will
2401add zero or one page to the memory footprint of each BL image. Each platform
2402should consider the trade-off between memory footprint and security.
2403
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002404This build flag is disabled by default, minimising memory footprint. On Arm
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002405platforms, it is enabled.
2406
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002407Publish and Subscribe Framework
2408-------------------------------
2409
2410The Publish and Subscribe Framework allows EL3 components to define and publish
2411events, to which other EL3 components can subscribe.
2412
2413The following macros are provided by the framework:
2414
2415- ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(event)``: Defines an event, and takes one argument,
2416 the event name, which must be a valid C identifier. All calls to
2417 ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` macro must be placed in the file
2418 ``pubsub_events.h``.
2419
2420- ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG(event, arg)``: Publishes a defined event, by iterating
2421 subscribed handlers and calling them in turn. The handlers will be passed the
2422 parameter ``arg``. The expected use-case is to broadcast an event.
2423
2424- ``PUBLISH_EVENT(event)``: Like ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG``, except that the value
2425 ``NULL`` is passed to subscribed handlers.
2426
2427- ``SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(event, handler)``: Registers the ``handler`` to
2428 subscribe to ``event``. The handler will be executed whenever the ``event``
2429 is published.
2430
2431- ``for_each_subscriber(event, subscriber)``: Iterates through all handlers
2432 subscribed for ``event``. ``subscriber`` must be a local variable of type
2433 ``pubsub_cb_t *``, and will point to each subscribed handler in turn during
2434 iteration. This macro can be used for those patterns that none of the
2435 ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros cover.
2436
2437Publishing an event that wasn't defined using ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` will
2438result in build error. Subscribing to an undefined event however won't.
2439
2440Subscribed handlers must be of type ``pubsub_cb_t``, with following function
2441signature:
2442
Paul Beesley29c02522019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002443.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002444
2445 typedef void* (*pubsub_cb_t)(const void *arg);
2446
2447There may be arbitrary number of handlers registered to the same event. The
2448order in which subscribed handlers are notified when that event is published is
2449not defined. Subscribed handlers may be executed in any order; handlers should
2450not assume any relative ordering amongst them.
2451
2452Publishing an event on a PE will result in subscribed handlers executing on that
2453PE only; it won't cause handlers to execute on a different PE.
2454
2455Note that publishing an event on a PE blocks until all the subscribed handlers
2456finish executing on the PE.
2457
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002458TF-A generic code publishes and subscribes to some events within. Platform
2459ports are discouraged from subscribing to them. These events may be withdrawn,
2460renamed, or have their semantics altered in the future. Platforms may however
2461register, publish, and subscribe to platform-specific events.
Dimitris Papastamos17b4c0d2017-10-13 15:27:58 +01002462
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002463Publish and Subscribe Example
2464~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2465
2466A publisher that wants to publish event ``foo`` would:
2467
2468- Define the event ``foo`` in the ``pubsub_events.h``.
2469
Paul Beesley29c02522019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002470 .. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002471
2472 REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(foo);
2473
2474- Depending on the nature of event, use one of ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros to
2475 publish the event at the appropriate path and time of execution.
2476
2477A subscriber that wants to subscribe to event ``foo`` published above would
2478implement:
2479
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002480.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002481
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002482 void *foo_handler(const void *arg)
2483 {
2484 void *result;
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002485
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002486 /* Do handling ... */
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002487
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002488 return result;
2489 }
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002490
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002491 SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(foo, foo_handler);
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002492
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002493
2494Reclaiming the BL31 initialization code
2495~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2496
2497A significant amount of the code used for the initialization of BL31 is never
2498needed again after boot time. In order to reduce the runtime memory
2499footprint, the memory used for this code can be reclaimed after initialization
2500has finished and be used for runtime data.
2501
2502The build option ``RECLAIM_INIT_CODE`` can be set to mark this boot time code
2503with a ``.text.init.*`` attribute which can be filtered and placed suitably
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002504within the BL image for later reclamation by the platform. The platform can
2505specify the filter and the memory region for this init section in BL31 via the
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002506plat.ld.S linker script. For example, on the FVP, this section is placed
2507overlapping the secondary CPU stacks so that after the cold boot is done, this
2508memory can be reclaimed for the stacks. The init memory section is initially
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002509mapped with ``RO``, ``EXECUTE`` attributes. After BL31 initialization has
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002510completed, the FVP changes the attributes of this section to ``RW``,
2511``EXECUTE_NEVER`` allowing it to be used for runtime data. The memory attributes
2512are changed within the ``bl31_plat_runtime_setup`` platform hook. The init
2513section section can be reclaimed for any data which is accessed after cold
2514boot initialization and it is upto the platform to make the decision.
2515
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002516.. _firmware_design_pmf:
2517
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002518Performance Measurement Framework
2519---------------------------------
2520
2521The Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) facilitates collection of
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002522timestamps by registered services and provides interfaces to retrieve them
2523from within TF-A. A platform can choose to expose appropriate SMCs to
2524retrieve these collected timestamps.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002525
2526By default, the global physical counter is used for the timestamp
2527value and is read via ``CNTPCT_EL0``. The framework allows to retrieve
2528timestamps captured by other CPUs.
2529
2530Timestamp identifier format
2531~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2532
2533A PMF timestamp is uniquely identified across the system via the
2534timestamp ID or ``tid``. The ``tid`` is composed as follows:
2535
2536::
2537
2538 Bits 0-7: The local timestamp identifier.
2539 Bits 8-9: Reserved.
2540 Bits 10-15: The service identifier.
2541 Bits 16-31: Reserved.
2542
2543#. The service identifier. Each PMF service is identified by a
2544 service name and a service identifier. Both the service name and
2545 identifier are unique within the system as a whole.
2546
2547#. The local timestamp identifier. This identifier is unique within a given
2548 service.
2549
2550Registering a PMF service
2551~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2552
2553To register a PMF service, the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` macro from ``pmf.h``
2554is used. The arguments required are the service name, the service ID,
2555the total number of local timestamps to be captured and a set of flags.
2556
2557The ``flags`` field can be specified as a bitwise-OR of the following values:
2558
2559::
2560
2561 PMF_STORE_ENABLE: The timestamp is stored in memory for later retrieval.
2562 PMF_DUMP_ENABLE: The timestamp is dumped on the serial console.
2563
2564The ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` reserves memory to store captured
2565timestamps in a PMF specific linker section at build time.
2566Additionally, it defines necessary functions to capture and
2567retrieve a particular timestamp for the given service at runtime.
2568
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002569The macro ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` only enables capturing PMF timestamps
2570from within TF-A. In order to retrieve timestamps from outside of TF-A, the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002571``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE_SMC()`` macro must be used instead. This macro
2572accepts the same set of arguments as the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()``
2573macro but additionally supports retrieving timestamps using SMCs.
2574
2575Capturing a timestamp
2576~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2577
2578PMF timestamps are stored in a per-service timestamp region. On a
2579system with multiple CPUs, each timestamp is captured and stored
2580in a per-CPU cache line aligned memory region.
2581
2582Having registered the service, the ``PMF_CAPTURE_TIMESTAMP()`` macro can be
2583used to capture a timestamp at the location where it is used. The macro
2584takes the service name, a local timestamp identifier and a flag as arguments.
2585
2586The ``flags`` field argument can be zero, or ``PMF_CACHE_MAINT`` which
2587instructs PMF to do cache maintenance following the capture. Cache
2588maintenance is required if any of the service's timestamps are captured
2589with data cache disabled.
2590
2591To capture a timestamp in assembly code, the caller should use
2592``pmf_calc_timestamp_addr`` macro (defined in ``pmf_asm_macros.S``) to
2593calculate the address of where the timestamp would be stored. The
2594caller should then read ``CNTPCT_EL0`` register to obtain the timestamp
2595and store it at the determined address for later retrieval.
2596
2597Retrieving a timestamp
2598~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2599
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002600From within TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved using either
2601``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_MPIDR()`` or ``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_INDEX()`` macros.
2602These macros accept the CPU's MPIDR value, or its ordinal position
2603respectively.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002604
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002605From outside TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved by calling
2606into ``pmf_smc_handler()``.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002607
Paul Beesley29c02522019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002608::
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002609
2610 Interface : pmf_smc_handler()
2611 Argument : unsigned int smc_fid, u_register_t x1,
2612 u_register_t x2, u_register_t x3,
2613 u_register_t x4, void *cookie,
2614 void *handle, u_register_t flags
2615 Return : uintptr_t
2616
2617 smc_fid: Holds the SMC identifier which is either `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_32`
2618 when the caller of the SMC is running in AArch32 mode
2619 or `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_64` when the caller is running in AArch64 mode.
2620 x1: Timestamp identifier.
2621 x2: The `mpidr` of the CPU for which the timestamp has to be retrieved.
2622 This can be the `mpidr` of a different core to the one initiating
2623 the SMC. In that case, service specific cache maintenance may be
2624 required to ensure the updated copy of the timestamp is returned.
2625 x3: A flags value that is either 0 or `PMF_CACHE_MAINT`. If
2626 `PMF_CACHE_MAINT` is passed, then the PMF code will perform a
2627 cache invalidate before reading the timestamp. This ensures
2628 an updated copy is returned.
2629
2630The remaining arguments, ``x4``, ``cookie``, ``handle`` and ``flags`` are unused
2631in this implementation.
2632
2633PMF code structure
2634~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2635
2636#. ``pmf_main.c`` consists of core functions that implement service registration,
2637 initialization, storing, dumping and retrieving timestamps.
2638
2639#. ``pmf_smc.c`` contains the SMC handling for registered PMF services.
2640
2641#. ``pmf.h`` contains the public interface to Performance Measurement Framework.
2642
2643#. ``pmf_asm_macros.S`` consists of macros to facilitate capturing timestamps in
2644 assembly code.
2645
2646#. ``pmf_helpers.h`` is an internal header used by ``pmf.h``.
2647
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002648Armv8-A Architecture Extensions
2649-------------------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002650
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002651TF-A makes use of Armv8-A Architecture Extensions where applicable. This
2652section lists the usage of Architecture Extensions, and build flags
2653controlling them.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002654
2655In general, and unless individually mentioned, the build options
Alexei Fedorovfa6f7742019-03-11 16:51:47 +00002656``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` select the Architecture Extension to
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002657target when building TF-A. Subsequent Arm Architecture Extensions are backward
2658compatible with previous versions.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002659
2660The build system only requires that ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` have a
2661valid numeric value. These build options only control whether or not
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002662Architecture Extension-specific code is included in the build. Otherwise, TF-A
2663targets the base Armv8.0-A architecture; i.e. as if ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 8
2664and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` == 0, which are also their respective default values.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002665
Paul Beesley43f35ef2019-05-29 13:59:40 +01002666.. seealso:: :ref:`Build Options`
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002667
2668For details on the Architecture Extension and available features, please refer
2669to the respective Architecture Extension Supplement.
2670
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002671Armv8.1-A
2672~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002673
2674This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` >= 8, or when
2675``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 8 and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` >= 1.
2676
Soby Mathewc97cba42019-09-25 14:03:41 +01002677- By default, a load-/store-exclusive instruction pair is used to implement
2678 spinlocks. The ``USE_SPINLOCK_CAS`` build option when set to 1 selects the
2679 spinlock implementation using the ARMv8.1-LSE Compare and Swap instruction.
2680 Notice this instruction is only available in AArch64 execution state, so
2681 the option is only available to AArch64 builds.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002682
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002683Armv8.2-A
2684~~~~~~~~~
Isla Mitchell9fce2722017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002685
Antonio Nino Diazd71446c2019-02-19 13:14:06 +00002686- The presence of ARMv8.2-TTCNP is detected at runtime. When it is present, the
2687 Common not Private (TTBRn_ELx.CnP) bit is enabled to indicate that multiple
Sandrine Bailleux7c0a8432018-01-29 14:48:15 +01002688 Processing Elements in the same Inner Shareable domain use the same
2689 translation table entries for a given stage of translation for a particular
2690 translation regime.
Isla Mitchell9fce2722017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002691
Jeenu Viswambharan3ff4aaa2018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002692Armv8.3-A
2693~~~~~~~~~
2694
Antonio Nino Diaz52839622019-01-31 11:58:00 +00002695- Pointer authentication features of Armv8.3-A are unconditionally enabled in
2696 the Non-secure world so that lower ELs are allowed to use them without
2697 causing a trap to EL3.
2698
2699 In order to enable the Secure world to use it, ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS``
2700 must be set to 1. This will add all pointer authentication system registers
2701 to the context that is saved when doing a world switch.
Jeenu Viswambharan3ff4aaa2018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002702
Alexei Fedorov06715f82019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002703 The TF-A itself has support for pointer authentication at runtime
Alexei Fedorov9fc59632019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002704 that can be enabled by setting ``BRANCH_PROTECTION`` option to non-zero and
Antonio Nino Diazb86048c2019-02-19 11:53:51 +00002705 ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS`` to 1. This enables pointer authentication in BL1,
2706 BL2, BL31, and the TSP if it is used.
2707
Alexei Fedorov06715f82019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002708 Note that Pointer Authentication is enabled for Non-secure world irrespective
2709 of the value of these build flags if the CPU supports it.
2710
Alexei Fedorovfa6f7742019-03-11 16:51:47 +00002711 If ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR == 8`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR >= 3`` the code footprint of
2712 enabling PAuth is lower because the compiler will use the optimized
2713 PAuth instructions rather than the backwards-compatible ones.
2714
Alexei Fedorov9fc59632019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002715Armv8.5-A
2716~~~~~~~~~
2717
2718- Branch Target Identification feature is selected by ``BRANCH_PROTECTION``
Manish Pandey700e7682021-10-21 21:53:49 +01002719 option set to 1. This option defaults to 0.
Justin Chadwell88d493f2019-07-18 16:16:32 +01002720
2721- Memory Tagging Extension feature is unconditionally enabled for both worlds
2722 (at EL0 and S-EL0) if it is only supported at EL0. If instead it is
2723 implemented at all ELs, it is unconditionally enabled for only the normal
2724 world. To enable it for the secure world as well, the build option
2725 ``CTX_INCLUDE_MTE_REGS`` is required. If the hardware does not implement
2726 MTE support at all, it is always disabled, no matter what build options
2727 are used.
Alexei Fedorov9fc59632019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002728
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002729Armv7-A
2730~~~~~~~
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002731
2732This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 7.
2733
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002734There are several Armv7-A extensions available. Obviously the TrustZone
2735extension is mandatory to support the TF-A bootloader and runtime services.
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002736
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002737Platform implementing an Armv7-A system can to define from its target
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002738Cortex-A architecture through ``ARM_CORTEX_A<X> = yes`` in their
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002739``platform.mk`` script. For example ``ARM_CORTEX_A15=yes`` for a
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002740Cortex-A15 target.
2741
2742Platform can also set ``ARM_WITH_NEON=yes`` to enable neon support.
Paul Beesleybe653a62019-10-04 16:17:46 +00002743Note that using neon at runtime has constraints on non secure world context.
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002744TF-A does not yet provide VFP context management.
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002745
2746Directive ``ARM_CORTEX_A<x>`` and ``ARM_WITH_NEON`` are used to set
2747the toolchain target architecture directive.
2748
2749Platform may choose to not define straight the toolchain target architecture
2750directive by defining ``MARCH32_DIRECTIVE``.
2751I.e:
2752
Paul Beesley29c02522019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002753.. code:: make
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002754
2755 MARCH32_DIRECTIVE := -mach=armv7-a
2756
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002757Code Structure
2758--------------
2759
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002760TF-A code is logically divided between the three boot loader stages mentioned
2761in the previous sections. The code is also divided into the following
2762categories (present as directories in the source code):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002763
2764- **Platform specific.** Choice of architecture specific code depends upon
2765 the platform.
2766- **Common code.** This is platform and architecture agnostic code.
2767- **Library code.** This code comprises of functionality commonly used by all
2768 other code. The PSCI implementation and other EL3 runtime frameworks reside
2769 as Library components.
2770- **Stage specific.** Code specific to a boot stage.
2771- **Drivers.**
2772- **Services.** EL3 runtime services (eg: SPD). Specific SPD services
2773 reside in the ``services/spd`` directory (e.g. ``services/spd/tspd``).
2774
2775Each boot loader stage uses code from one or more of the above mentioned
2776categories. Based upon the above, the code layout looks like this:
2777
2778::
2779
2780 Directory Used by BL1? Used by BL2? Used by BL31?
2781 bl1 Yes No No
2782 bl2 No Yes No
2783 bl31 No No Yes
2784 plat Yes Yes Yes
2785 drivers Yes No Yes
2786 common Yes Yes Yes
2787 lib Yes Yes Yes
2788 services No No Yes
2789
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002790The build system provides a non configurable build option IMAGE_BLx for each
2791boot loader stage (where x = BL stage). e.g. for BL1 , IMAGE_BL1 will be
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002792defined by the build system. This enables TF-A to compile certain code only
2793for specific boot loader stages
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002794
2795All assembler files have the ``.S`` extension. The linker source files for each
2796boot stage have the extension ``.ld.S``. These are processed by GCC to create the
2797linker scripts which have the extension ``.ld``.
2798
2799FDTs provide a description of the hardware platform and are used by the Linux
2800kernel at boot time. These can be found in the ``fdts`` directory.
2801
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002802.. rubric:: References
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002803
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002804- `Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D)`_
2805
2806- `Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_
2807
Sandrine Bailleux71ac9312020-04-17 14:06:52 +02002808- `SMC Calling Convention`_
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002809
2810- :ref:`Interrupt Management Framework`
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002811
2812--------------
2813
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01002814*Copyright (c) 2013-2022, Arm Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.*
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002815
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002816.. _Power State Coordination Interface PDD: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
laurenw-arm3ba55a32020-04-16 10:02:17 -05002817.. _SMCCC: https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0028/latest
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002818.. _PSCI: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
2819.. _Power State Coordination Interface PDD: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
Petre-Ionut Tudor62c9be72019-09-27 15:13:21 +01002820.. _Arm ARM: https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0487/latest
laurenw-arm3ba55a32020-04-16 10:02:17 -05002821.. _SMC Calling Convention: https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0028/latest
Sandrine Bailleuxc1491eb2019-04-24 10:41:24 +02002822.. _Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D): https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0006/latest/trusted-board-boot-requirements-client-tbbr-client-armv8-a
Zelalem Aweke7446c262021-10-21 13:59:45 -05002823.. _Arm Confidential Compute Architecture (Arm CCA): https://www.arm.com/why-arm/architecture/security-features/arm-confidential-compute-architecture
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002824
Paul Beesleya2c320a2019-03-13 15:49:27 +00002825.. |Image 1| image:: ../resources/diagrams/rt-svc-descs-layout.png