blob: 94f8656dd2a52db0d930eb7b4b2269d076cab522 [file] [log] [blame]
Paul Beesley8aa05052019-03-07 15:47:15 +00001Firmware Design
2===============
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01003
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00004Trusted Firmware-A (TF-A) implements a subset of the Trusted Board Boot
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01005Requirements (TBBR) Platform Design Document (PDD) for Arm reference
6platforms.
7
8The TBB sequence starts when the platform is powered on and runs up
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01009to the stage where it hands-off control to firmware running in the normal
10world in DRAM. This is the cold boot path.
11
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010012TF-A also implements the `Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_ as a
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000013runtime service. PSCI is the interface from normal world software to firmware
14implementing power management use-cases (for example, secondary CPU boot,
15hotplug and idle). Normal world software can access TF-A runtime services via
16the Arm SMC (Secure Monitor Call) instruction. The SMC instruction must be
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010017used as mandated by the SMC Calling Convention (`SMCCC`_).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010018
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000019TF-A implements a framework for configuring and managing interrupts generated
20in either security state. The details of the interrupt management framework
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010021and its design can be found in :ref:`Interrupt Management Framework`.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010022
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000023TF-A also implements a library for setting up and managing the translation
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010024tables. The details of this library can be found in
25:ref:`Translation (XLAT) Tables Library`.
Antonio Nino Diaz6feb9e82017-05-23 11:49:22 +010026
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000027TF-A can be built to support either AArch64 or AArch32 execution state.
Zelalem Aweke7446c262021-10-21 13:59:45 -050028
Harrison Mutai24566a32023-05-12 09:45:14 +010029.. note::
30 The descriptions in this chapter are for the Arm TrustZone architecture.
31 For changes to the firmware design for the `Arm Confidential Compute
32 Architecture (Arm CCA)`_ please refer to the chapter :ref:`Realm Management
33 Extension (RME)`.
Zelalem Aweke7446c262021-10-21 13:59:45 -050034
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010035Cold boot
36---------
37
38The cold boot path starts when the platform is physically turned on. If
39``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU=0``, one of the CPUs released from reset is chosen as the
40primary CPU, and the remaining CPUs are considered secondary CPUs. The primary
41CPU is chosen through platform-specific means. The cold boot path is mainly
42executed by the primary CPU, other than essential CPU initialization executed by
43all CPUs. The secondary CPUs are kept in a safe platform-specific state until
44the primary CPU has performed enough initialization to boot them.
45
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +010046Refer to the :ref:`CPU Reset` for more information on the effect of the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010047``COLD_BOOT_SINGLE_CPU`` platform build option.
48
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000049The cold boot path in this implementation of TF-A depends on the execution
50state. For AArch64, it is divided into five steps (in order of execution):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010051
52- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
53- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
54- Boot Loader stage 3-1 (BL31) *EL3 Runtime Software*
55- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *Secure-EL1 Payload* (optional)
56- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
57
58For AArch32, it is divided into four steps (in order of execution):
59
60- Boot Loader stage 1 (BL1) *AP Trusted ROM*
61- Boot Loader stage 2 (BL2) *Trusted Boot Firmware*
62- Boot Loader stage 3-2 (BL32) *EL3 Runtime Software*
63- Boot Loader stage 3-3 (BL33) *Non-trusted Firmware*
64
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +000065Arm development platforms (Fixed Virtual Platforms (FVPs) and Juno) implement a
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010066combination of the following types of memory regions. Each bootloader stage uses
67one or more of these memory regions.
68
69- Regions accessible from both non-secure and secure states. For example,
70 non-trusted SRAM, ROM and DRAM.
71- Regions accessible from only the secure state. For example, trusted SRAM and
72 ROM. The FVPs also implement the trusted DRAM which is statically
73 configured. Additionally, the Base FVPs and Juno development platform
74 configure the TrustZone Controller (TZC) to create a region in the DRAM
75 which is accessible only from the secure state.
76
77The sections below provide the following details:
78
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +000079- dynamic configuration of Boot Loader stages
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +010080- initialization and execution of the first three stages during cold boot
81- specification of the EL3 Runtime Software (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for
82 AArch32) entrypoint requirements for use by alternative Trusted Boot
83 Firmware in place of the provided BL1 and BL2
84
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +000085Dynamic Configuration during cold boot
86~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
87
88Each of the Boot Loader stages may be dynamically configured if required by the
89platform. The Boot Loader stage may optionally specify a firmware
90configuration file and/or hardware configuration file as listed below:
91
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +010092- FW_CONFIG - The firmware configuration file. Holds properties shared across
93 all BLx images.
94 An example is the "dtb-registry" node, which contains the information about
95 the other device tree configurations (load-address, size, image_id).
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +000096- HW_CONFIG - The hardware configuration file. Can be shared by all Boot Loader
97 stages and also by the Normal World Rich OS.
98- TB_FW_CONFIG - Trusted Boot Firmware configuration file. Shared between BL1
99 and BL2.
100- SOC_FW_CONFIG - SoC Firmware configuration file. Used by BL31.
101- TOS_FW_CONFIG - Trusted OS Firmware configuration file. Used by Trusted OS
102 (BL32).
103- NT_FW_CONFIG - Non Trusted Firmware configuration file. Used by Non-trusted
104 firmware (BL33).
105
106The Arm development platforms use the Flattened Device Tree format for the
107dynamic configuration files.
108
109Each Boot Loader stage can pass up to 4 arguments via registers to the next
110stage. BL2 passes the list of the next images to execute to the *EL3 Runtime
111Software* (BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32) via `arg0`. All the other
112arguments are platform defined. The Arm development platforms use the following
113convention:
114
115- BL1 passes the address of a meminfo_t structure to BL2 via ``arg1``. This
116 structure contains the memory layout available to BL2.
117- When dynamic configuration files are present, the firmware configuration for
118 the next Boot Loader stage is populated in the first available argument and
119 the generic hardware configuration is passed the next available argument.
120 For example,
121
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +0100122 - FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` to BL2.
123 - TB_FW_CONFIG address is retrieved by BL2 from FW_CONFIG device tree.
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000124 - If HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1, then its address is passed in ``arg2`` to
125 BL2. Note, ``arg1`` is already used for meminfo_t.
126 - If SOC_FW_CONFIG is loaded by BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg1``
127 to BL31. Note, ``arg0`` is used to pass the list of executable images.
128 - Similarly, if HW_CONFIG is loaded by BL1 or BL2, then its address is
129 passed in ``arg2`` to BL31.
130 - For other BL3x images, if the firmware configuration file is loaded by
131 BL2, then its address is passed in ``arg0`` and if HW_CONFIG is loaded
132 then its address is passed in ``arg1``.
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +0100133 - In case of the Arm FVP platform, FW_CONFIG address passed in ``arg1`` to
134 BL31/SP_MIN, and the SOC_FW_CONFIG and HW_CONFIG details are retrieved
135 from FW_CONFIG device tree.
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000136
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100137BL1
138~~~
139
140This stage begins execution from the platform's reset vector at EL3. The reset
141address is platform dependent but it is usually located in a Trusted ROM area.
142The BL1 data section is copied to trusted SRAM at runtime.
143
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000144On the Arm development platforms, BL1 code starts execution from the reset
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100145vector defined by the constant ``BL1_RO_BASE``. The BL1 data section is copied
146to the top of trusted SRAM as defined by the constant ``BL1_RW_BASE``.
147
148The functionality implemented by this stage is as follows.
149
150Determination of boot path
151^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
152
153Whenever a CPU is released from reset, BL1 needs to distinguish between a warm
154boot and a cold boot. This is done using platform-specific mechanisms (see the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100155``plat_get_my_entrypoint()`` function in the :ref:`Porting Guide`). In the case
156of a warm boot, a CPU is expected to continue execution from a separate
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100157entrypoint. In the case of a cold boot, the secondary CPUs are placed in a safe
158platform-specific state (see the ``plat_secondary_cold_boot_setup()`` function in
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100159the :ref:`Porting Guide`) while the primary CPU executes the remaining cold boot
160path as described in the following sections.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100161
162This step only applies when ``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS=0``. Refer to the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100163:ref:`CPU Reset` for more information on the effect of the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100164``PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS`` platform build option.
165
166Architectural initialization
167^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
168
169BL1 performs minimal architectural initialization as follows.
170
171- Exception vectors
172
173 BL1 sets up simple exception vectors for both synchronous and asynchronous
174 exceptions. The default behavior upon receiving an exception is to populate
175 a status code in the general purpose register ``X0/R0`` and call the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100176 ``plat_report_exception()`` function (see the :ref:`Porting Guide`). The
177 status code is one of:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100178
179 For AArch64:
180
181 ::
182
183 0x0 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
184 0x1 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
185 0x2 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
186 0x3 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_EL0
187 0x4 : Synchronous exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
188 0x5 : IRQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
189 0x6 : FIQ exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
190 0x7 : System Error exception from Current EL with SP_ELx
191 0x8 : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch64
192 0x9 : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
193 0xa : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch64
194 0xb : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch64
195 0xc : Synchronous exception from Lower EL using aarch32
196 0xd : IRQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
197 0xe : FIQ exception from Lower EL using aarch32
198 0xf : System Error exception from Lower EL using aarch32
199
200 For AArch32:
201
202 ::
203
204 0x10 : User mode
205 0x11 : FIQ mode
206 0x12 : IRQ mode
207 0x13 : SVC mode
208 0x16 : Monitor mode
209 0x17 : Abort mode
210 0x1a : Hypervisor mode
211 0x1b : Undefined mode
212 0x1f : System mode
213
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000214 The ``plat_report_exception()`` implementation on the Arm FVP port programs
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100215 the Versatile Express System LED register in the following format to
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +0000216 indicate the occurrence of an unexpected exception:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100217
218 ::
219
220 SYS_LED[0] - Security state (Secure=0/Non-Secure=1)
221 SYS_LED[2:1] - Exception Level (EL3=0x3, EL2=0x2, EL1=0x1, EL0=0x0)
222 For AArch32 it is always 0x0
223 SYS_LED[7:3] - Exception Class (Sync/Async & origin). This is the value
224 of the status code
225
226 A write to the LED register reflects in the System LEDs (S6LED0..7) in the
227 CLCD window of the FVP.
228
229 BL1 does not expect to receive any exceptions other than the SMC exception.
230 For the latter, BL1 installs a simple stub. The stub expects to receive a
231 limited set of SMC types (determined by their function IDs in the general
232 purpose register ``X0/R0``):
233
234 - ``BL1_SMC_RUN_IMAGE``: This SMC is raised by BL2 to make BL1 pass control
235 to EL3 Runtime Software.
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100236 - All SMCs listed in section "BL1 SMC Interface" in the :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)`
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100237 Design Guide are supported for AArch64 only. These SMCs are currently
238 not supported when BL1 is built for AArch32.
239
240 Any other SMC leads to an assertion failure.
241
242- CPU initialization
243
244 BL1 calls the ``reset_handler()`` function which in turn calls the CPU
245 specific reset handler function (see the section: "CPU specific operations
246 framework").
247
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100248Platform initialization
249^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
250
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000251On Arm platforms, BL1 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100252
253- Enable the Trusted Watchdog.
254- Initialize the console.
255- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
256- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
257- Configure any required platform storage to load the next bootloader image
258 (BL2).
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000259- If the BL1 dynamic configuration file, ``TB_FW_CONFIG``, is available, then
260 load it to the platform defined address and make it available to BL2 via
261 ``arg0``.
Soby Mathew3208edc2018-06-11 16:40:36 +0100262- Configure the system timer and program the `CNTFRQ_EL0` for use by NS-BL1U
263 and NS-BL2U firmware update images.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100264
265Firmware Update detection and execution
266^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
267
268After performing platform setup, BL1 common code calls
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100269``bl1_plat_get_next_image_id()`` to determine if :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` is
270required or to proceed with the normal boot process. If the platform code
271returns ``BL2_IMAGE_ID`` then the normal boot sequence is executed as described
272in the next section, else BL1 assumes that :ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` is
273required and execution passes to the first image in the
274:ref:`Firmware Update (FWU)` process. In either case, BL1 retrieves a descriptor
275of the next image by calling ``bl1_plat_get_image_desc()``. The image descriptor
276contains an ``entry_point_info_t`` structure, which BL1 uses to initialize the
277execution state of the next image.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100278
279BL2 image load and execution
280^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
281
282In the normal boot flow, BL1 execution continues as follows:
283
284#. BL1 prints the following string from the primary CPU to indicate successful
285 execution of the BL1 stage:
286
287 ::
288
289 "Booting Trusted Firmware"
290
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000291#. BL1 loads a BL2 raw binary image from platform storage, at a
292 platform-specific base address. Prior to the load, BL1 invokes
293 ``bl1_plat_handle_pre_image_load()`` which allows the platform to update or
294 use the image information. If the BL2 image file is not present or if
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100295 there is not enough free trusted SRAM the following error message is
296 printed:
297
298 ::
299
300 "Failed to load BL2 firmware."
301
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000302#. BL1 invokes ``bl1_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` which again is intended
303 for platforms to take further action after image load. This function must
304 populate the necessary arguments for BL2, which may also include the memory
305 layout. Further description of the memory layout can be found later
306 in this document.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100307
308#. BL1 passes control to the BL2 image at Secure EL1 (for AArch64) or at
309 Secure SVC mode (for AArch32), starting from its load address.
310
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100311BL2
312~~~
313
314BL1 loads and passes control to BL2 at Secure-EL1 (for AArch64) or at Secure
315SVC mode (for AArch32) . BL2 is linked against and loaded at a platform-specific
316base address (more information can be found later in this document).
317The functionality implemented by BL2 is as follows.
318
319Architectural initialization
320^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
321
322For AArch64, BL2 performs the minimal architectural initialization required
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000323for subsequent stages of TF-A and normal world software. EL1 and EL0 are given
Peng Fan093ba622020-08-21 10:47:17 +0800324access to Floating Point and Advanced SIMD registers by setting the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000325``CPACR.FPEN`` bits.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100326
327For AArch32, the minimal architectural initialization required for subsequent
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000328stages of TF-A and normal world software is taken care of in BL1 as both BL1
329and BL2 execute at PL1.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100330
331Platform initialization
332^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
333
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000334On Arm platforms, BL2 performs the following platform initializations:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100335
336- Initialize the console.
337- Configure any required platform storage to allow loading further bootloader
338 images.
339- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
340- Perform platform security setup to allow access to controlled components.
341- Reserve some memory for passing information to the next bootloader image
342 EL3 Runtime Software and populate it.
343- Define the extents of memory available for loading each subsequent
344 bootloader image.
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000345- If BL1 has passed TB_FW_CONFIG dynamic configuration file in ``arg0``,
346 then parse it.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100347
348Image loading in BL2
349^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
350
Roberto Vargased51b512018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100351BL2 generic code loads the images based on the list of loadable images
352provided by the platform. BL2 passes the list of executable images
353provided by the platform to the next handover BL image.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100354
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +0000355The list of loadable images provided by the platform may also contain
356dynamic configuration files. The files are loaded and can be parsed as
357needed in the ``bl2_plat_handle_post_image_load()`` function. These
358configuration files can be passed to next Boot Loader stages as arguments
359by updating the corresponding entrypoint information in this function.
360
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100361SCP_BL2 (System Control Processor Firmware) image load
362^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100363
364Some systems have a separate System Control Processor (SCP) for power, clock,
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100365reset and system control. BL2 loads the optional SCP_BL2 image from platform
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100366storage into a platform-specific region of secure memory. The subsequent
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100367handling of SCP_BL2 is platform specific. For example, on the Juno Arm
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100368development platform port the image is transferred into SCP's internal memory
369using the Boot Over MHU (BOM) protocol after being loaded in the trusted SRAM
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100370memory. The SCP executes SCP_BL2 and signals to the Application Processor (AP)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100371for BL2 execution to continue.
372
373EL3 Runtime Software image load
374^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
375
376BL2 loads the EL3 Runtime Software image from platform storage into a platform-
377specific address in trusted SRAM. If there is not enough memory to load the
Roberto Vargased51b512018-09-24 17:20:48 +0100378image or image is missing it leads to an assertion failure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100379
380AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image load
381^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
382
383BL2 loads the optional BL32 image from platform storage into a platform-
384specific region of secure memory. The image executes in the secure world. BL2
385relies on BL31 to pass control to the BL32 image, if present. Hence, BL2
386populates a platform-specific area of memory with the entrypoint/load-address
387of the BL32 image. The value of the Saved Processor Status Register (``SPSR``)
388for entry into BL32 is not determined by BL2, it is initialized by the
389Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (see later) within BL31, which is responsible for
390managing interaction with BL32. This information is passed to BL31.
391
392BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) image load
393^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
394
395BL2 loads the BL33 image (e.g. UEFI or other test or boot software) from
396platform storage into non-secure memory as defined by the platform.
397
398BL2 relies on EL3 Runtime Software to pass control to BL33 once secure state
399initialization is complete. Hence, BL2 populates a platform-specific area of
400memory with the entrypoint and Saved Program Status Register (``SPSR``) of the
401normal world software image. The entrypoint is the load address of the BL33
402image. The ``SPSR`` is determined as specified in Section 5.13 of the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100403`Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_. This information is passed to the
404EL3 Runtime Software.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100405
406AArch64 BL31 (EL3 Runtime Software) execution
407^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
408
409BL2 execution continues as follows:
410
411#. BL2 passes control back to BL1 by raising an SMC, providing BL1 with the
412 BL31 entrypoint. The exception is handled by the SMC exception handler
413 installed by BL1.
414
415#. BL1 turns off the MMU and flushes the caches. It clears the
416 ``SCTLR_EL3.M/I/C`` bits, flushes the data cache to the point of coherency
417 and invalidates the TLBs.
418
419#. BL1 passes control to BL31 at the specified entrypoint at EL3.
420
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000421Running BL2 at EL3 execution level
422~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
423
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000424Some platforms have a non-TF-A Boot ROM that expects the next boot stage
425to execute at EL3. On these platforms, TF-A BL1 is a waste of memory
426as its only purpose is to ensure TF-A BL2 is entered at S-EL1. To avoid
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000427this waste, a special mode enables BL2 to execute at EL3, which allows
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000428a non-TF-A Boot ROM to load and jump directly to BL2. This mode is selected
Arvind Ram Prakash42d4d3b2022-11-22 14:41:00 -0600429when the build flag RESET_TO_BL2 is enabled.
430The main differences in this mode are:
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000431
432#. BL2 includes the reset code and the mailbox mechanism to differentiate
433 cold boot and warm boot. It runs at EL3 doing the arch
434 initialization required for EL3.
435
436#. BL2 does not receive the meminfo information from BL1 anymore. This
437 information can be passed by the Boot ROM or be internal to the
438 BL2 image.
439
440#. Since BL2 executes at EL3, BL2 jumps directly to the next image,
441 instead of invoking the RUN_IMAGE SMC call.
442
443
444We assume 3 different types of BootROM support on the platform:
445
446#. The Boot ROM always jumps to the same address, for both cold
447 and warm boot. In this case, we will need to keep a resident part
448 of BL2 whose memory cannot be reclaimed by any other image. The
449 linker script defines the symbols __TEXT_RESIDENT_START__ and
450 __TEXT_RESIDENT_END__ that allows the platform to configure
451 correctly the memory map.
452#. The platform has some mechanism to indicate the jump address to the
453 Boot ROM. Platform code can then program the jump address with
454 psci_warmboot_entrypoint during cold boot.
455#. The platform has some mechanism to program the reset address using
456 the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS feature. Platform code can then
457 program the reset address with psci_warmboot_entrypoint during
458 cold boot, bypassing the boot ROM for warm boot.
459
460In the last 2 cases, no part of BL2 needs to remain resident at
461runtime. In the first 2 cases, we expect the Boot ROM to be able to
462differentiate between warm and cold boot, to avoid loading BL2 again
463during warm boot.
464
465This functionality can be tested with FVP loading the image directly
466in memory and changing the address where the system jumps at reset.
467For example:
468
Dimitris Papastamos42be6fc2018-06-11 11:07:58 +0100469 -C cluster0.cpu0.RVBAR=0x4022000
470 --data cluster0.cpu0=bl2.bin@0x4022000
Roberto Vargas4cd17692017-11-20 13:36:10 +0000471
472With this configuration, FVP is like a platform of the first case,
473where the Boot ROM jumps always to the same address. For simplification,
474BL32 is loaded in DRAM in this case, to avoid other images reclaiming
475BL2 memory.
476
477
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100478AArch64 BL31
479~~~~~~~~~~~~
480
481The image for this stage is loaded by BL2 and BL1 passes control to BL31 at
482EL3. BL31 executes solely in trusted SRAM. BL31 is linked against and
483loaded at a platform-specific base address (more information can be found later
484in this document). The functionality implemented by BL31 is as follows.
485
486Architectural initialization
487^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
488
489Currently, BL31 performs a similar architectural initialization to BL1 as
490far as system register settings are concerned. Since BL1 code resides in ROM,
491architectural initialization in BL31 allows override of any previous
492initialization done by BL1.
493
494BL31 initializes the per-CPU data framework, which provides a cache of
495frequently accessed per-CPU data optimised for fast, concurrent manipulation
496on different CPUs. This buffer includes pointers to per-CPU contexts, crash
497buffer, CPU reset and power down operations, PSCI data, platform data and so on.
498
499It then replaces the exception vectors populated by BL1 with its own. BL31
500exception vectors implement more elaborate support for handling SMCs since this
501is the only mechanism to access the runtime services implemented by BL31 (PSCI
502for example). BL31 checks each SMC for validity as specified by the
Sandrine Bailleux71ac9312020-04-17 14:06:52 +0200503`SMC Calling Convention`_ before passing control to the required SMC
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100504handler routine.
505
506BL31 programs the ``CNTFRQ_EL0`` register with the clock frequency of the system
507counter, which is provided by the platform.
508
509Platform initialization
510^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
511
512BL31 performs detailed platform initialization, which enables normal world
513software to function correctly.
514
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000515On Arm platforms, this consists of the following:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100516
517- Initialize the console.
518- Configure the Interconnect to enable hardware coherency.
519- Enable the MMU and map the memory it needs to access.
520- Initialize the generic interrupt controller.
521- Initialize the power controller device.
522- Detect the system topology.
523
524Runtime services initialization
525^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
526
527BL31 is responsible for initializing the runtime services. One of them is PSCI.
528
529As part of the PSCI initializations, BL31 detects the system topology. It also
530initializes the data structures that implement the state machine used to track
531the state of power domain nodes. The state can be one of ``OFF``, ``RUN`` or
532``RETENTION``. All secondary CPUs are initially in the ``OFF`` state. The cluster
533that the primary CPU belongs to is ``ON``; any other cluster is ``OFF``. It also
534initializes the locks that protect them. BL31 accesses the state of a CPU or
535cluster immediately after reset and before the data cache is enabled in the
536warm boot path. It is not currently possible to use 'exclusive' based spinlocks,
537therefore BL31 uses locks based on Lamport's Bakery algorithm instead.
538
539The runtime service framework and its initialization is described in more
540detail in the "EL3 runtime services framework" section below.
541
542Details about the status of the PSCI implementation are provided in the
543"Power State Coordination Interface" section below.
544
545AArch64 BL32 (Secure-EL1 Payload) image initialization
546^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
547
548If a BL32 image is present then there must be a matching Secure-EL1 Payload
549Dispatcher (SPD) service (see later for details). During initialization
550that service must register a function to carry out initialization of BL32
551once the runtime services are fully initialized. BL31 invokes such a
552registered function to initialize BL32 before running BL33. This initialization
553is not necessary for AArch32 SPs.
554
555Details on BL32 initialization and the SPD's role are described in the
Paul Beesley43f35ef2019-05-29 13:59:40 +0100556:ref:`firmware_design_sel1_spd` section below.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100557
558BL33 (Non-trusted Firmware) execution
559^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
560
561EL3 Runtime Software initializes the EL2 or EL1 processor context for normal-
562world cold boot, ensuring that no secure state information finds its way into
563the non-secure execution state. EL3 Runtime Software uses the entrypoint
564information provided by BL2 to jump to the Non-trusted firmware image (BL33)
565at the highest available Exception Level (EL2 if available, otherwise EL1).
566
567Using alternative Trusted Boot Firmware in place of BL1 & BL2 (AArch64 only)
568~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
569
570Some platforms have existing implementations of Trusted Boot Firmware that
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000571would like to use TF-A BL31 for the EL3 Runtime Software. To enable this
572firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully documented and stable
573interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and BL31.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100574
575Future changes to the BL31 interface will be done in a backwards compatible
576way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently enhanced/
577updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
578
579Required CPU state when calling ``bl31_entrypoint()`` during cold boot
580^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
581
582This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
583
584On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch64
585EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
586
587::
588
589 PSTATE.EL = 3
590 PSTATE.RW = 1
591 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
592 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
593
594X0 and X1 can be used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
595platform code in BL31:
596
597::
598
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000599 X0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100600 X1 : Platform specific information
601
602BL31 zero-init sections (e.g. ``.bss``) should not contain valid data on entry,
603these will be zero filled prior to invoking platform setup code.
604
605Use of the X0 and X1 parameters
606'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
607
608The parameters are platform specific and passed from ``bl31_entrypoint()`` to
609``bl31_early_platform_setup()``. The value of these parameters is never directly
610used by the common BL31 code.
611
612The convention is that ``X0`` conveys information regarding the BL31, BL32 and
613BL33 images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``X1`` can be used for other
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000614platform specific purpose. This convention allows platforms which use TF-A's
615BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform specific information from
616Secure Boot without conflicting with future evolution of TF-A using ``X0`` to
617pass a ``bl31_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100618
619BL31 common and SPD initialization code depends on image and entrypoint
620information about BL33 and BL32, which is provided via BL31 platform APIs.
621This information is required until the start of execution of BL33. This
622information can be provided in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
623the platform code in BL31, or provided in a platform defined memory location
624by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware via the
625Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned out of
626the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then accessed by
627BL31 platform code before the caches are enabled.
628
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000629TF-A's BL2 implementation passes a ``bl31_params`` structure in
630``X0`` and the Arm development platforms interpret this in the BL31 platform
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100631code.
632
633MMU, Data caches & Coherency
634''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
635
636BL31 does not depend on the enabled state of the MMU, data caches or
637interconnect coherency on entry to ``bl31_entrypoint()``. If these are disabled
638on entry, these should be enabled during ``bl31_plat_arch_setup()``.
639
640Data structures used in the BL31 cold boot interface
641''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
642
643These structures are designed to support compatibility and independent
644evolution of the structures and the firmware images. For example, a version of
645BL31 that can interpret the BL3x image information from different versions of
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100646BL2, a platform that uses an extended entry_point_info structure to convey
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100647additional register information to BL31, or a ELF image loader that can convey
648more details about the firmware images.
649
650To support these scenarios the structures are versioned and sized, which enables
651BL31 to detect which information is present and respond appropriately. The
652``param_header`` is defined to capture this information:
653
654.. code:: c
655
656 typedef struct param_header {
657 uint8_t type; /* type of the structure */
658 uint8_t version; /* version of this structure */
659 uint16_t size; /* size of this structure in bytes */
660 uint32_t attr; /* attributes: unused bits SBZ */
661 } param_header_t;
662
663The structures using this format are ``entry_point_info``, ``image_info`` and
664``bl31_params``. The code that allocates and populates these structures must set
665the header fields appropriately, and the ``SET_PARAM_HEAD()`` a macro is defined
666to simplify this action.
667
668Required CPU state for BL31 Warm boot initialization
669^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
670
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000671When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, TF-A provides
672the platform power management code with a Warm boot initialization
673entry-point, to be invoked by the CPU immediately after the reset handler.
674On entry to the Warm boot initialization function the calling CPU must be in
675AArch64 EL3, little-endian data access and all interrupt sources masked:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100676
677::
678
679 PSTATE.EL = 3
680 PSTATE.RW = 1
681 PSTATE.DAIF = 0xf
682 SCTLR_EL3.EE = 0
683
684The PSCI implementation will initialize the processor state and ensure that the
685platform power management code is then invoked as required to initialize all
686necessary system, cluster and CPU resources.
687
688AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software entrypoint interface
689~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
690
691To enable this firmware architecture it is important to provide a fully
692documented and stable interface between the Trusted Boot Firmware and the
693AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software.
694
695Future changes to the entrypoint interface will be done in a backwards
696compatible way, and this enables these firmware components to be independently
697enhanced/updated to develop and exploit new functionality.
698
699Required CPU state when entering during cold boot
700^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
701
702This function must only be called by the primary CPU.
703
704On entry to this function the calling primary CPU must be executing in AArch32
705EL3, little-endian data access, and all interrupt sources masked:
706
707::
708
709 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
710 SCTLR.EE = 0
711
712R0 and R1 are used to pass information from the Trusted Boot Firmware to the
713platform code in AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software:
714
715::
716
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000717 R0 : Reserved for common TF-A information
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100718 R1 : Platform specific information
719
720Use of the R0 and R1 parameters
721'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
722
723The parameters are platform specific and the convention is that ``R0`` conveys
724information regarding the BL3x images from the Trusted Boot firmware and ``R1``
725can be used for other platform specific purpose. This convention allows
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000726platforms which use TF-A's BL1 and BL2 images to transfer additional platform
727specific information from Secure Boot without conflicting with future
728evolution of TF-A using ``R0`` to pass a ``bl_params`` structure.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100729
730The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software is responsible for entry into BL33. This
731information can be obtained in a platform defined manner, e.g. compiled into
732the AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, or provided in a platform defined memory
733location by the Trusted Boot firmware, or passed from the Trusted Boot Firmware
734via the Cold boot Initialization parameters. This data may need to be cleaned
735out of the CPU caches if it is provided by an earlier boot stage and then
736accessed by AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software before the caches are enabled.
737
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000738When using AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software, the Arm development platforms pass a
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100739``bl_params`` structure in ``R0`` from BL2 to be interpreted by AArch32 EL3 Runtime
740Software platform code.
741
742MMU, Data caches & Coherency
743''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
744
745AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must not depend on the enabled state of the MMU,
746data caches or interconnect coherency in its entrypoint. They must be explicitly
747enabled if required.
748
749Data structures used in cold boot interface
750'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
751
752The AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software cold boot interface uses ``bl_params`` instead
753of ``bl31_params``. The ``bl_params`` structure is based on the convention
754described in AArch64 BL31 cold boot interface section.
755
756Required CPU state for warm boot initialization
757^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
758
759When requesting a CPU power-on, or suspending a running CPU, AArch32 EL3
760Runtime Software must ensure execution of a warm boot initialization entrypoint.
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100761If TF-A BL1 is used and the PROGRAMMABLE_RESET_ADDRESS build flag is false,
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000762then AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software must ensure that BL1 branches to the warm
763boot entrypoint by arranging for the BL1 platform function,
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100764plat_get_my_entrypoint(), to return a non-zero value.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100765
766In this case, the warm boot entrypoint must be in AArch32 EL3, little-endian
767data access and all interrupt sources masked:
768
769::
770
771 PSTATE.AIF = 0x7
772 SCTLR.EE = 0
773
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000774The warm boot entrypoint may be implemented by using TF-A
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100775``psci_warmboot_entrypoint()`` function. In that case, the platform must fulfil
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +0100776the pre-requisites mentioned in the
777:ref:`PSCI Library Integration guide for Armv8-A AArch32 systems`.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100778
779EL3 runtime services framework
780------------------------------
781
782Software executing in the non-secure state and in the secure state at exception
783levels lower than EL3 will request runtime services using the Secure Monitor
784Call (SMC) instruction. These requests will follow the convention described in
785the SMC Calling Convention PDD (`SMCCC`_). The `SMCCC`_ assigns function
786identifiers to each SMC request and describes how arguments are passed and
787returned.
788
789The EL3 runtime services framework enables the development of services by
790different providers that can be easily integrated into final product firmware.
791The following sections describe the framework which facilitates the
792registration, initialization and use of runtime services in EL3 Runtime
793Software (BL31).
794
795The design of the runtime services depends heavily on the concepts and
796definitions described in the `SMCCC`_, in particular SMC Function IDs, Owning
797Entity Numbers (OEN), Fast and Yielding calls, and the SMC32 and SMC64 calling
798conventions. Please refer to that document for more detailed explanation of
799these terms.
800
801The following runtime services are expected to be implemented first. They have
802not all been instantiated in the current implementation.
803
804#. Standard service calls
805
806 This service is for management of the entire system. The Power State
807 Coordination Interface (`PSCI`_) is the first set of standard service calls
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000808 defined by Arm (see PSCI section later).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100809
810#. Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher service
811
812 If a system runs a Trusted OS or other Secure-EL1 Payload (SP) then
813 it also requires a *Secure Monitor* at EL3 to switch the EL1 processor
814 context between the normal world (EL1/EL2) and trusted world (Secure-EL1).
815 The Secure Monitor will make these world switches in response to SMCs. The
816 `SMCCC`_ provides for such SMCs with the Trusted OS Call and Trusted
817 Application Call OEN ranges.
818
819 The interface between the EL3 Runtime Software and the Secure-EL1 Payload is
820 not defined by the `SMCCC`_ or any other standard. As a result, each
821 Secure-EL1 Payload requires a specific Secure Monitor that runs as a runtime
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000822 service - within TF-A this service is referred to as the Secure-EL1 Payload
823 Dispatcher (SPD).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100824
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000825 TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and its associated Dispatcher
826 (TSPD). Details of SPD design and TSP/TSPD operation are described in the
Paul Beesley43f35ef2019-05-29 13:59:40 +0100827 :ref:`firmware_design_sel1_spd` section below.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100828
829#. CPU implementation service
830
831 This service will provide an interface to CPU implementation specific
832 services for a given platform e.g. access to processor errata workarounds.
833 This service is currently unimplemented.
834
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +0000835Additional services for Arm Architecture, SiP and OEM calls can be implemented.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100836Each implemented service handles a range of SMC function identifiers as
837described in the `SMCCC`_.
838
839Registration
840~~~~~~~~~~~~
841
842A runtime service is registered using the ``DECLARE_RT_SVC()`` macro, specifying
843the name of the service, the range of OENs covered, the type of service and
844initialization and call handler functions. This macro instantiates a ``const struct rt_svc_desc`` for the service with these details (see ``runtime_svc.h``).
Chris Kayda043412023-02-14 11:30:04 +0000845This structure is allocated in a special ELF section ``.rt_svc_descs``, enabling
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100846the framework to find all service descriptors included into BL31.
847
848The specific service for a SMC Function is selected based on the OEN and call
849type of the Function ID, and the framework uses that information in the service
850descriptor to identify the handler for the SMC Call.
851
852The service descriptors do not include information to identify the precise set
853of SMC function identifiers supported by this service implementation, the
854security state from which such calls are valid nor the capability to support
85564-bit and/or 32-bit callers (using SMC32 or SMC64). Responding appropriately
856to these aspects of a SMC call is the responsibility of the service
857implementation, the framework is focused on integration of services from
858different providers and minimizing the time taken by the framework before the
859service handler is invoked.
860
861Details of the parameters, requirements and behavior of the initialization and
862call handling functions are provided in the following sections.
863
864Initialization
865~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
866
867``runtime_svc_init()`` in ``runtime_svc.c`` initializes the runtime services
868framework running on the primary CPU during cold boot as part of the BL31
869initialization. This happens prior to initializing a Trusted OS and running
870Normal world boot firmware that might in turn use these services.
871Initialization involves validating each of the declared runtime service
872descriptors, calling the service initialization function and populating the
873index used for runtime lookup of the service.
874
875The BL31 linker script collects all of the declared service descriptors into a
876single array and defines symbols that allow the framework to locate and traverse
877the array, and determine its size.
878
879The framework does basic validation of each descriptor to halt firmware
880initialization if service declaration errors are detected. The framework does
881not check descriptors for the following error conditions, and may behave in an
882unpredictable manner under such scenarios:
883
884#. Overlapping OEN ranges
885#. Multiple descriptors for the same range of OENs and ``call_type``
886#. Incorrect range of owning entity numbers for a given ``call_type``
887
888Once validated, the service ``init()`` callback is invoked. This function carries
889out any essential EL3 initialization before servicing requests. The ``init()``
890function is only invoked on the primary CPU during cold boot. If the service
891uses per-CPU data this must either be initialized for all CPUs during this call,
892or be done lazily when a CPU first issues an SMC call to that service. If
893``init()`` returns anything other than ``0``, this is treated as an initialization
894error and the service is ignored: this does not cause the firmware to halt.
895
896The OEN and call type fields present in the SMC Function ID cover a total of
897128 distinct services, but in practice a single descriptor can cover a range of
898OENs, e.g. SMCs to call a Trusted OS function. To optimize the lookup of a
899service handler, the framework uses an array of 128 indices that map every
900distinct OEN/call-type combination either to one of the declared services or to
901indicate the service is not handled. This ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array is
902populated for all of the OENs covered by a service after the service ``init()``
903function has reported success. So a service that fails to initialize will never
904have it's ``handle()`` function invoked.
905
906The following figure shows how the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` index maps the SMC
907Function ID call type and OEN onto a specific service handler in the
908``rt_svc_descs[]`` array.
909
910|Image 1|
911
Madhukar Pappireddy6844c342020-07-29 09:37:25 -0500912.. _handling-an-smc:
913
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100914Handling an SMC
915~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
916
917When the EL3 runtime services framework receives a Secure Monitor Call, the SMC
918Function ID is passed in W0 from the lower exception level (as per the
919`SMCCC`_). If the calling register width is AArch32, it is invalid to invoke an
920SMC Function which indicates the SMC64 calling convention: such calls are
921ignored and return the Unknown SMC Function Identifier result code ``0xFFFFFFFF``
922in R0/X0.
923
924Bit[31] (fast/yielding call) and bits[29:24] (owning entity number) of the SMC
925Function ID are combined to index into the ``rt_svc_descs_indices[]`` array. The
926resulting value might indicate a service that has no handler, in this case the
927framework will also report an Unknown SMC Function ID. Otherwise, the value is
928used as a further index into the ``rt_svc_descs[]`` array to locate the required
929service and handler.
930
931The service's ``handle()`` callback is provided with five of the SMC parameters
932directly, the others are saved into memory for retrieval (if needed) by the
933handler. The handler is also provided with an opaque ``handle`` for use with the
934supporting library for parameter retrieval, setting return values and context
Olivier Deprez0fe7b9f2022-10-11 15:38:27 +0200935manipulation. The ``flags`` parameter indicates the security state of the caller
936and the state of the SVE hint bit per the SMCCCv1.3. The framework finally sets
937up the execution stack for the handler, and invokes the services ``handle()``
938function.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100939
Madhukar Pappireddye34cc0c2019-11-09 23:28:08 -0600940On return from the handler the result registers are populated in X0-X7 as needed
941before restoring the stack and CPU state and returning from the original SMC.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100942
Jeenu Viswambharane31d76f2017-10-18 14:30:53 +0100943Exception Handling Framework
944----------------------------
945
johpow01526f2bd2020-07-28 13:07:25 -0500946Please refer to the :ref:`Exception Handling Framework` document.
Jeenu Viswambharane31d76f2017-10-18 14:30:53 +0100947
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100948Power State Coordination Interface
949----------------------------------
950
951TODO: Provide design walkthrough of PSCI implementation.
952
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +0100953The PSCI v1.1 specification categorizes APIs as optional and mandatory. All the
954mandatory APIs in PSCI v1.1, PSCI v1.0 and in PSCI v0.2 draft specification
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100955`Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_ are implemented. The table lists
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +0100956the PSCI v1.1 APIs and their support in generic code.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100957
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +0100958An API implementation might have a dependency on platform code e.g. CPU_SUSPEND
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100959requires the platform to export a part of the implementation. Hence the level
960of support of the mandatory APIs depends upon the support exported by the
961platform port as well. The Juno and FVP (all variants) platforms export all the
962required support.
963
964+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +0100965| PSCI v1.1 API | Supported | Comments |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100966+=============================+=============+===============================+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +0100967| ``PSCI_VERSION`` | Yes | The version returned is 1.1 |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +0100968+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
969| ``CPU_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
970+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
971| ``CPU_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
972+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
973| ``CPU_ON`` | Yes\* | |
974+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
975| ``AFFINITY_INFO`` | Yes | |
976+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
977| ``MIGRATE`` | Yes\*\* | |
978+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
979| ``MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE`` | Yes\*\* | |
980+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
981| ``MIGRATE_INFO_CPU`` | Yes\*\* | |
982+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
983| ``SYSTEM_OFF`` | Yes\* | |
984+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
985| ``SYSTEM_RESET`` | Yes\* | |
986+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
987| ``PSCI_FEATURES`` | Yes | |
988+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
989| ``CPU_FREEZE`` | No | |
990+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
991| ``CPU_DEFAULT_SUSPEND`` | No | |
992+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
993| ``NODE_HW_STATE`` | Yes\* | |
994+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
995| ``SYSTEM_SUSPEND`` | Yes\* | |
996+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
997| ``PSCI_SET_SUSPEND_MODE`` | No | |
998+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
999| ``PSCI_STAT_RESIDENCY`` | Yes\* | |
1000+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1001| ``PSCI_STAT_COUNT`` | Yes\* | |
1002+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Roberto Vargasfe3e40e2017-09-12 10:28:35 +01001003| ``SYSTEM_RESET2`` | Yes\* | |
1004+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1005| ``MEM_PROTECT`` | Yes\* | |
1006+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
1007| ``MEM_PROTECT_CHECK_RANGE`` | Yes\* | |
1008+-----------------------------+-------------+-------------------------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001009
1010\*Note : These PSCI APIs require platform power management hooks to be
1011registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1012
1013\*\*Note : These PSCI APIs require appropriate Secure Payload Dispatcher
1014hooks to be registered with the generic PSCI code to be supported.
1015
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001016The PSCI implementation in TF-A is a library which can be integrated with
1017AArch64 or AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software for Armv8-A systems. A guide to
1018integrating PSCI library with AArch32 EL3 Runtime Software can be found
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001019at :ref:`PSCI Library Integration guide for Armv8-A AArch32 systems`.
1020
1021.. _firmware_design_sel1_spd:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001022
1023Secure-EL1 Payloads and Dispatchers
1024-----------------------------------
1025
1026On a production system that includes a Trusted OS running in Secure-EL1/EL0,
1027the Trusted OS is coupled with a companion runtime service in the BL31
1028firmware. This service is responsible for the initialisation of the Trusted
1029OS and all communications with it. The Trusted OS is the BL32 stage of the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001030boot flow in TF-A. The firmware will attempt to locate, load and execute a
1031BL32 image.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001032
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001033TF-A uses a more general term for the BL32 software that runs at Secure-EL1 -
1034the *Secure-EL1 Payload* - as it is not always a Trusted OS.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001035
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001036TF-A provides a Test Secure-EL1 Payload (TSP) and a Test Secure-EL1 Payload
1037Dispatcher (TSPD) service as an example of how a Trusted OS is supported on a
1038production system using the Runtime Services Framework. On such a system, the
1039Test BL32 image and service are replaced by the Trusted OS and its dispatcher
1040service. The TF-A build system expects that the dispatcher will define the
1041build flag ``NEED_BL32`` to enable it to include the BL32 in the build either
1042as a binary or to compile from source depending on whether the ``BL32`` build
1043option is specified or not.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001044
1045The TSP runs in Secure-EL1. It is designed to demonstrate synchronous
1046communication with the normal-world software running in EL1/EL2. Communication
1047is initiated by the normal-world software
1048
1049- either directly through a Fast SMC (as defined in the `SMCCC`_)
1050
1051- or indirectly through a `PSCI`_ SMC. The `PSCI`_ implementation in turn
1052 informs the TSPD about the requested power management operation. This allows
1053 the TSP to prepare for or respond to the power state change
1054
1055The TSPD service is responsible for.
1056
1057- Initializing the TSP
1058
1059- Routing requests and responses between the secure and the non-secure
1060 states during the two types of communications just described
1061
1062Initializing a BL32 Image
1063~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1064
1065The Secure-EL1 Payload Dispatcher (SPD) service is responsible for initializing
1066the BL32 image. It needs access to the information passed by BL2 to BL31 to do
1067so. This is provided by:
1068
1069.. code:: c
1070
1071 entry_point_info_t *bl31_plat_get_next_image_ep_info(uint32_t);
1072
1073which returns a reference to the ``entry_point_info`` structure corresponding to
1074the image which will be run in the specified security state. The SPD uses this
1075API to get entry point information for the SECURE image, BL32.
1076
1077In the absence of a BL32 image, BL31 passes control to the normal world
1078bootloader image (BL33). When the BL32 image is present, it is typical
1079that the SPD wants control to be passed to BL32 first and then later to BL33.
1080
1081To do this the SPD has to register a BL32 initialization function during
1082initialization of the SPD service. The BL32 initialization function has this
1083prototype:
1084
1085.. code:: c
1086
1087 int32_t init(void);
1088
1089and is registered using the ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` function.
1090
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001091TF-A supports two approaches for the SPD to pass control to BL32 before
1092returning through EL3 and running the non-trusted firmware (BL33):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001093
1094#. In the BL32 setup function, use ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` to
1095 request that the exit from ``bl31_main()`` is to the BL32 entrypoint in
1096 Secure-EL1. BL31 will exit to BL32 using the asynchronous method by
1097 calling ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` and ``el3_exit()``.
1098
1099 When the BL32 has completed initialization at Secure-EL1, it returns to
1100 BL31 by issuing an SMC, using a Function ID allocated to the SPD. On
1101 receipt of this SMC, the SPD service handler should switch the CPU context
1102 from trusted to normal world and use the ``bl31_set_next_image_type()`` and
1103 ``bl31_prepare_next_image_entry()`` functions to set up the initial return to
1104 the normal world firmware BL33. On return from the handler the framework
1105 will exit to EL2 and run BL33.
1106
1107#. The BL32 setup function registers an initialization function using
1108 ``bl31_register_bl32_init()`` which provides a SPD-defined mechanism to
1109 invoke a 'world-switch synchronous call' to Secure-EL1 to run the BL32
1110 entrypoint.
Paul Beesleye1c50262019-03-13 16:20:44 +00001111
1112 .. note::
1113 The Test SPD service included with TF-A provides one implementation
1114 of such a mechanism.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001115
1116 On completion BL32 returns control to BL31 via a SMC, and on receipt the
1117 SPD service handler invokes the synchronous call return mechanism to return
1118 to the BL32 initialization function. On return from this function,
1119 ``bl31_main()`` will set up the return to the normal world firmware BL33 and
1120 continue the boot process in the normal world.
1121
Jeenu Viswambharan579b4ad2017-08-24 15:43:44 +01001122Crash Reporting in BL31
1123-----------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001124
1125BL31 implements a scheme for reporting the processor state when an unhandled
1126exception is encountered. The reporting mechanism attempts to preserve all the
1127register contents and report it via a dedicated UART (PL011 console). BL31
1128reports the general purpose, EL3, Secure EL1 and some EL2 state registers.
1129
1130A dedicated per-CPU crash stack is maintained by BL31 and this is retrieved via
1131the per-CPU pointer cache. The implementation attempts to minimise the memory
1132required for this feature. The file ``crash_reporting.S`` contains the
1133implementation for crash reporting.
1134
1135The sample crash output is shown below.
1136
1137::
1138
Alexei Fedorovb4292bc2020-03-03 13:31:58 +00001139 x0 = 0x000000002a4a0000
1140 x1 = 0x0000000000000001
1141 x2 = 0x0000000000000002
1142 x3 = 0x0000000000000003
1143 x4 = 0x0000000000000004
1144 x5 = 0x0000000000000005
1145 x6 = 0x0000000000000006
1146 x7 = 0x0000000000000007
1147 x8 = 0x0000000000000008
1148 x9 = 0x0000000000000009
1149 x10 = 0x0000000000000010
1150 x11 = 0x0000000000000011
1151 x12 = 0x0000000000000012
1152 x13 = 0x0000000000000013
1153 x14 = 0x0000000000000014
1154 x15 = 0x0000000000000015
1155 x16 = 0x0000000000000016
1156 x17 = 0x0000000000000017
1157 x18 = 0x0000000000000018
1158 x19 = 0x0000000000000019
1159 x20 = 0x0000000000000020
1160 x21 = 0x0000000000000021
1161 x22 = 0x0000000000000022
1162 x23 = 0x0000000000000023
1163 x24 = 0x0000000000000024
1164 x25 = 0x0000000000000025
1165 x26 = 0x0000000000000026
1166 x27 = 0x0000000000000027
1167 x28 = 0x0000000000000028
1168 x29 = 0x0000000000000029
1169 x30 = 0x0000000088000b78
1170 scr_el3 = 0x000000000003073d
1171 sctlr_el3 = 0x00000000b0cd183f
1172 cptr_el3 = 0x0000000000000000
1173 tcr_el3 = 0x000000008080351c
1174 daif = 0x00000000000002c0
1175 mair_el3 = 0x00000000004404ff
1176 spsr_el3 = 0x0000000060000349
1177 elr_el3 = 0x0000000088000114
1178 ttbr0_el3 = 0x0000000004018201
1179 esr_el3 = 0x00000000be000000
1180 far_el3 = 0x0000000000000000
1181 spsr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1182 elr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1183 spsr_abt = 0x0000000000000000
1184 spsr_und = 0x0000000000000000
1185 spsr_irq = 0x0000000000000000
1186 spsr_fiq = 0x0000000000000000
1187 sctlr_el1 = 0x0000000030d00800
1188 actlr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1189 cpacr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1190 csselr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1191 sp_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1192 esr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1193 ttbr0_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1194 ttbr1_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1195 mair_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1196 amair_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1197 tcr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1198 tpidr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1199 tpidr_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1200 tpidrro_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1201 par_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1202 mpidr_el1 = 0x0000000080000000
1203 afsr0_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1204 afsr1_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1205 contextidr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1206 vbar_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1207 cntp_ctl_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1208 cntp_cval_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1209 cntv_ctl_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1210 cntv_cval_el0 = 0x0000000000000000
1211 cntkctl_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1212 sp_el0 = 0x0000000004014940
1213 isr_el1 = 0x0000000000000000
1214 dacr32_el2 = 0x0000000000000000
1215 ifsr32_el2 = 0x0000000000000000
1216 icc_hppir0_el1 = 0x00000000000003ff
1217 icc_hppir1_el1 = 0x00000000000003ff
1218 icc_ctlr_el3 = 0x0000000000080400
1219 gicd_ispendr regs (Offsets 0x200-0x278)
1220 Offset Value
1221 0x200: 0x0000000000000000
1222 0x208: 0x0000000000000000
1223 0x210: 0x0000000000000000
1224 0x218: 0x0000000000000000
1225 0x220: 0x0000000000000000
1226 0x228: 0x0000000000000000
1227 0x230: 0x0000000000000000
1228 0x238: 0x0000000000000000
1229 0x240: 0x0000000000000000
1230 0x248: 0x0000000000000000
1231 0x250: 0x0000000000000000
1232 0x258: 0x0000000000000000
1233 0x260: 0x0000000000000000
1234 0x268: 0x0000000000000000
1235 0x270: 0x0000000000000000
1236 0x278: 0x0000000000000000
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001237
1238Guidelines for Reset Handlers
1239-----------------------------
1240
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001241TF-A implements a framework that allows CPU and platform ports to perform
1242actions very early after a CPU is released from reset in both the cold and warm
1243boot paths. This is done by calling the ``reset_handler()`` function in both
1244the BL1 and BL31 images. It in turn calls the platform and CPU specific reset
1245handling functions.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001246
1247Details for implementing a CPU specific reset handler can be found in
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001248:ref:`firmware_design_cpu_specific_reset_handling`. Details for implementing a
1249platform specific reset handler can be found in the :ref:`Porting Guide` (see
1250the``plat_reset_handler()`` function).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001251
1252When adding functionality to a reset handler, keep in mind that if a different
1253reset handling behavior is required between the first and the subsequent
1254invocations of the reset handling code, this should be detected at runtime.
1255In other words, the reset handler should be able to detect whether an action has
1256already been performed and act as appropriate. Possible courses of actions are,
1257e.g. skip the action the second time, or undo/redo it.
1258
Madhukar Pappireddy6844c342020-07-29 09:37:25 -05001259.. _configuring-secure-interrupts:
1260
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001261Configuring secure interrupts
1262-----------------------------
1263
1264The GIC driver is responsible for performing initial configuration of secure
1265interrupts on the platform. To this end, the platform is expected to provide the
1266GIC driver (either GICv2 or GICv3, as selected by the platform) with the
1267interrupt configuration during the driver initialisation.
1268
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001269Secure interrupt configuration are specified in an array of secure interrupt
1270properties. In this scheme, in both GICv2 and GICv3 driver data structures, the
1271``interrupt_props`` member points to an array of interrupt properties. Each
Antonio Nino Diaz73308612019-02-28 13:35:21 +00001272element of the array specifies the interrupt number and its attributes
1273(priority, group, configuration). Each element of the array shall be populated
1274by the macro ``INTR_PROP_DESC()``. The macro takes the following arguments:
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001275
Ming Huangd5eee8f2023-02-01 14:03:44 +08001276- 13-bit interrupt number,
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001277
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001278- 8-bit interrupt priority,
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001279
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001280- Interrupt type (one of ``INTR_TYPE_EL3``, ``INTR_TYPE_S_EL1``,
1281 ``INTR_TYPE_NS``),
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001282
Antonio Nino Diazf9ed3cb2018-09-24 17:23:24 +01001283- Interrupt configuration (either ``GIC_INTR_CFG_LEVEL`` or
1284 ``GIC_INTR_CFG_EDGE``).
Jeenu Viswambharanc639e8e2017-09-22 08:32:09 +01001285
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001286.. _firmware_design_cpu_ops_fwk:
1287
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001288CPU specific operations framework
1289---------------------------------
1290
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001291Certain aspects of the Armv8-A architecture are implementation defined,
1292that is, certain behaviours are not architecturally defined, but must be
1293defined and documented by individual processor implementations. TF-A
1294implements a framework which categorises the common implementation defined
1295behaviours and allows a processor to export its implementation of that
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001296behaviour. The categories are:
1297
1298#. Processor specific reset sequence.
1299
1300#. Processor specific power down sequences.
1301
1302#. Processor specific register dumping as a part of crash reporting.
1303
1304#. Errata status reporting.
1305
1306Each of the above categories fulfils a different requirement.
1307
1308#. allows any processor specific initialization before the caches and MMU
1309 are turned on, like implementation of errata workarounds, entry into
1310 the intra-cluster coherency domain etc.
1311
1312#. allows each processor to implement the power down sequence mandated in
1313 its Technical Reference Manual (TRM).
1314
1315#. allows a processor to provide additional information to the developer
1316 in the event of a crash, for example Cortex-A53 has registers which
1317 can expose the data cache contents.
1318
1319#. allows a processor to define a function that inspects and reports the status
1320 of all errata workarounds on that processor.
1321
1322Please note that only 2. is mandated by the TRM.
1323
1324The CPU specific operations framework scales to accommodate a large number of
1325different CPUs during power down and reset handling. The platform can specify
1326any CPU optimization it wants to enable for each CPU. It can also specify
1327the CPU errata workarounds to be applied for each CPU type during reset
1328handling by defining CPU errata compile time macros. Details on these macros
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001329can be found in the :ref:`Arm CPU Specific Build Macros` document.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001330
1331The CPU specific operations framework depends on the ``cpu_ops`` structure which
1332needs to be exported for each type of CPU in the platform. It is defined in
1333``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and has the following fields : ``midr``,
1334``reset_func()``, ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` (array of power down functions) and
1335``cpu_reg_dump()``.
1336
1337The CPU specific files in ``lib/cpus`` export a ``cpu_ops`` data structure with
1338suitable handlers for that CPU. For example, ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cortex_a53.S``
1339exports the ``cpu_ops`` for Cortex-A53 CPU. According to the platform
1340configuration, these CPU specific files must be included in the build by
1341the platform makefile. The generic CPU specific operations framework code exists
1342in ``lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_helpers.S``.
1343
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001344CPU PCS
1345~~~~~~~
1346
1347All assembly functions in CPU files are asked to follow a modified version of
1348the Procedure Call Standard (PCS) in their internals. This is done to ensure
1349calling these functions from outside the file doesn't unexpectedly corrupt
1350registers in the very early environment and to help the internals to be easier
1351to understand. Please see the :ref:`firmware_design_cpu_errata_implementation`
1352for any function specific restrictions.
1353
1354+--------------+---------------------------------+
1355| register | use |
1356+==============+=================================+
1357| x0 - x15 | scratch |
1358+--------------+---------------------------------+
1359| x16, x17 | do not use (used by the linker) |
1360+--------------+---------------------------------+
1361| x18 | do not use (platform register) |
1362+--------------+---------------------------------+
1363| x19 - x28 | callee saved |
1364+--------------+---------------------------------+
1365| x29, x30 | FP, LR |
1366+--------------+---------------------------------+
1367
1368.. _firmware_design_cpu_specific_reset_handling:
1369
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001370CPU specific Reset Handling
1371~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1372
1373After a reset, the state of the CPU when it calls generic reset handler is:
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001374MMU turned off, both instruction and data caches turned off, not part
1375of any coherency domain and no stack.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001376
1377The BL entrypoint code first invokes the ``plat_reset_handler()`` to allow
1378the platform to perform any system initialization required and any system
1379errata workarounds that needs to be applied. The ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` reads
1380the current CPU midr, finds the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry in the ``cpu_ops``
1381array and returns it. Note that only the part number and implementer fields
1382in midr are used to find the matching ``cpu_ops`` entry. The ``reset_func()`` in
1383the returned ``cpu_ops`` is then invoked which executes the required reset
1384handling for that CPU and also any errata workarounds enabled by the platform.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001385
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001386It should be defined using the ``cpu_reset_func_{start,end}`` macros and its
1387body may only clobber x0 to x14 with x14 being the cpu_rev parameter.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001388
1389CPU specific power down sequence
1390~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1391
1392During the BL31 initialization sequence, the pointer to the matching ``cpu_ops``
1393entry is stored in per-CPU data by ``init_cpu_ops()`` so that it can be quickly
1394retrieved during power down sequences.
1395
1396Various CPU drivers register handlers to perform power down at certain power
1397levels for that specific CPU. The PSCI service, upon receiving a power down
1398request, determines the highest power level at which to execute power down
1399sequence for a particular CPU. It uses the ``prepare_cpu_pwr_dwn()`` function to
1400pick the right power down handler for the requested level. The function
1401retrieves ``cpu_ops`` pointer member of per-CPU data, and from that, further
1402retrieves ``cpu_pwr_down_ops`` array, and indexes into the required level. If the
1403requested power level is higher than what a CPU driver supports, the handler
1404registered for highest level is invoked.
1405
1406At runtime the platform hooks for power down are invoked by the PSCI service to
1407perform platform specific operations during a power down sequence, for example
1408turning off CCI coherency during a cluster power down.
1409
1410CPU specific register reporting during crash
1411~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1412
1413If the crash reporting is enabled in BL31, when a crash occurs, the crash
1414reporting framework calls ``do_cpu_reg_dump`` which retrieves the matching
1415``cpu_ops`` using ``get_cpu_ops_ptr()`` function. The ``cpu_reg_dump()`` in
1416``cpu_ops`` is invoked, which then returns the CPU specific register values to
1417be reported and a pointer to the ASCII list of register names in a format
1418expected by the crash reporting framework.
1419
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001420.. _firmware_design_cpu_errata_implementation:
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01001421
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001422CPU errata implementation
1423~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001424
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001425Errata workarounds for CPUs supported in TF-A are applied during both cold and
1426warm boots, shortly after reset. Individual Errata workarounds are enabled as
1427build options. Some errata workarounds have potential run-time implications;
1428therefore some are enabled by default, others not. Platform ports shall
1429override build options to enable or disable errata as appropriate. The CPU
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001430drivers take care of applying errata workarounds that are enabled and applicable
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001431to a given CPU.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001432
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001433Each erratum has a build flag in ``lib/cpus/cpu-ops.mk`` of the form:
1434``ERRATA_<cpu_num>_<erratum_id>``. It also has a short description in
1435:ref:`arm_cpu_macros_errata_workarounds` on when it should apply.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001436
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001437Errata framework
1438^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001439
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001440The errata framework is a convention and a small library to allow errata to be
1441automatically discovered. It enables compliant errata to be automatically
1442applied and reported at runtime (either by status reporting or the errata ABI).
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001443
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001444To write a compliant mitigation for erratum number ``erratum_id`` on a cpu that
1445declared itself (with ``declare_cpu_ops``) as ``cpu_name`` one needs 3 things:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001446
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001447#. A CPU revision checker function: ``check_erratum_<cpu_name>_<erratum_id>``
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001448
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001449 It should check whether this erratum applies on this revision of this CPU.
1450 It will be called with the CPU revision as its first parameter (x0) and
1451 should return one of ``ERRATA_APPLIES`` or ``ERRATA_NOT_APPLIES``.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001452
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001453 It may only clobber x0 to x4. The rest should be treated as callee-saved.
1454
1455#. A workaround function: ``erratum_<cpu_name>_<erratum_id>_wa``
1456
1457 It should obtain the cpu revision (with ``cpu_get_rev_var``), call its
1458 revision checker, and perform the mitigation, should the erratum apply.
1459
1460 It may only clobber x0 to x8. The rest should be treated as callee-saved.
1461
1462#. Register itself to the framework
1463
1464 Do this with
1465 ``add_erratum_entry <cpu_name>, ERRATUM(<erratum_id>), <errata_flag>``
1466 where the ``errata_flag`` is the enable flag in ``cpu-ops.mk`` described
1467 above.
1468
1469See the next section on how to do this easily.
1470
1471.. note::
1472
1473 CVEs have the format ``CVE_<year>_<number>``. To fit them in the framework, the
1474 ``erratum_id`` for the checker and the workaround functions become the
1475 ``number`` part of its name and the ``ERRATUM(<number>)`` part of the
1476 registration should instead be ``CVE(<year>, <number>)``. In the extremely
1477 unlikely scenario where a CVE and an erratum numbers clash, the CVE number
1478 should be prefixed with a zero.
1479
1480 Also, their build flag should be ``WORKAROUND_CVE_<year>_<number>``.
1481
1482.. note::
1483
1484 AArch32 uses the legacy convention. The checker function has the format
1485 ``check_errata_<erratum_id>`` and the workaround has the format
1486 ``errata_<cpu_number>_<erratum_id>_wa`` where ``cpu_number`` is the shortform
1487 letter and number name of the CPU.
1488
1489 For CVEs the ``erratum_id`` also becomes ``cve_<year>_<number>``.
1490
1491Errata framework helpers
1492^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1493
1494Writing these errata involves lots of boilerplate and repetitive code. On
1495AArch64 there are helpers to omit most of this. They are located in
1496``include/lib/cpus/aarch64/cpu_macros.S`` and the preferred way to implement
1497errata. Please see their comments on how to use them.
1498
1499The most common type of erratum workaround, one that just sets a "chicken" bit
1500in some arbitrary register, would have an implementation for the Cortex-A77,
1501erratum #1925769 like::
1502
1503 workaround_reset_start cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769), ERRATA_A77_1925769
1504 sysreg_bit_set CORTEX_A77_CPUECTLR_EL1, CORTEX_A77_CPUECTLR_EL1_BIT_8
1505 workaround_reset_end cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769)
1506
1507 check_erratum_ls cortex_a77, ERRATUM(1925769), CPU_REV(1, 1)
1508
1509Status reporting
1510^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001511
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001512In a debug build of TF-A, on a CPU that comes out of reset, both BL1 and the
Boyan Karatotev6a0e8e82023-02-07 15:46:50 +00001513runtime firmware (BL31 in AArch64, and BL32 in AArch32) will invoke a generic
1514errata status reporting function. It will read the ``errata_entries`` list of
1515that cpu and will report whether each known erratum was applied and, if not,
1516whether it should have been.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001517
1518Reporting the status of errata workaround is for informational purpose only; it
1519has no functional significance.
1520
1521Memory layout of BL images
1522--------------------------
1523
1524Each bootloader image can be divided in 2 parts:
1525
1526- the static contents of the image. These are data actually stored in the
1527 binary on the disk. In the ELF terminology, they are called ``PROGBITS``
1528 sections;
1529
1530- the run-time contents of the image. These are data that don't occupy any
1531 space in the binary on the disk. The ELF binary just contains some
1532 metadata indicating where these data will be stored at run-time and the
1533 corresponding sections need to be allocated and initialized at run-time.
1534 In the ELF terminology, they are called ``NOBITS`` sections.
1535
1536All PROGBITS sections are grouped together at the beginning of the image,
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001537followed by all NOBITS sections. This is true for all TF-A images and it is
1538governed by the linker scripts. This ensures that the raw binary images are
1539as small as possible. If a NOBITS section was inserted in between PROGBITS
1540sections then the resulting binary file would contain zero bytes in place of
1541this NOBITS section, making the image unnecessarily bigger. Smaller images
1542allow faster loading from the FIP to the main memory.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001543
Samuel Hollandf8578e62018-10-17 21:40:18 -05001544For BL31, a platform can specify an alternate location for NOBITS sections
1545(other than immediately following PROGBITS sections) by setting
1546``SEPARATE_NOBITS_REGION`` to 1 and defining ``BL31_NOBITS_BASE`` and
1547``BL31_NOBITS_LIMIT``.
1548
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001549Linker scripts and symbols
1550~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1551
1552Each bootloader stage image layout is described by its own linker script. The
1553linker scripts export some symbols into the program symbol table. Their values
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001554correspond to particular addresses. TF-A code can refer to these symbols to
1555figure out the image memory layout.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001556
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001557Linker symbols follow the following naming convention in TF-A.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001558
1559- ``__<SECTION>_START__``
1560
1561 Start address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``.
1562
1563- ``__<SECTION>_END__``
1564
1565 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an alignment
1566 constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_END__`` corresponds
1567 to the end address of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the right
1568 boundary. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__`` to know the
1569 actual end address of the section's contents.
1570
1571- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__``
1572
1573 End address of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1574 rounding up due to some alignment constraint.
1575
1576- ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1577
1578 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>``. If there is an
1579 alignment constraint on the section's end address then ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__``
1580 corresponds to the size of the section's actual contents, rounded up to the
1581 right boundary. In other words, ``__<SECTION>_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_END__ - _<SECTION>_START__``. Refer to the value of ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1582 to know the actual size of the section's contents.
1583
1584- ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1585
1586 Size (in bytes) of a given section named ``<SECTION>`` without any padding or
1587 rounding up due to some alignment constraint. In other words,
1588 ``__<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_SIZE__ = __<SECTION>_UNALIGNED_END__ - __<SECTION>_START__``.
1589
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001590Some of the linker symbols are mandatory as TF-A code relies on them to be
1591defined. They are listed in the following subsections. Some of them must be
1592provided for each bootloader stage and some are specific to a given bootloader
1593stage.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001594
1595The linker scripts define some extra, optional symbols. They are not actually
1596used by any code but they help in understanding the bootloader images' memory
1597layout as they are easy to spot in the link map files.
1598
1599Common linker symbols
1600^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1601
1602All BL images share the following requirements:
1603
1604- The BSS section must be zero-initialised before executing any C code.
1605- The coherent memory section (if enabled) must be zero-initialised as well.
1606- The MMU setup code needs to know the extents of the coherent and read-only
1607 memory regions to set the right memory attributes. When
1608 ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA=1``, it needs to know more specifically how the
1609 read-only memory region is divided between code and data.
1610
1611The following linker symbols are defined for this purpose:
1612
1613- ``__BSS_START__``
1614- ``__BSS_SIZE__``
1615- ``__COHERENT_RAM_START__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1616- ``__COHERENT_RAM_END__`` Must be aligned on a page-size boundary.
1617- ``__COHERENT_RAM_UNALIGNED_SIZE__``
1618- ``__RO_START__``
1619- ``__RO_END__``
1620- ``__TEXT_START__``
1621- ``__TEXT_END__``
1622- ``__RODATA_START__``
1623- ``__RODATA_END__``
1624
1625BL1's linker symbols
1626^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1627
1628BL1 being the ROM image, it has additional requirements. BL1 resides in ROM and
1629it is entirely executed in place but it needs some read-write memory for its
1630mutable data. Its ``.data`` section (i.e. its allocated read-write data) must be
1631relocated from ROM to RAM before executing any C code.
1632
1633The following additional linker symbols are defined for BL1:
1634
1635- ``__BL1_ROM_END__`` End address of BL1's ROM contents, covering its code
1636 and ``.data`` section in ROM.
1637- ``__DATA_ROM_START__`` Start address of the ``.data`` section in ROM. Must be
1638 aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1639- ``__DATA_RAM_START__`` Address in RAM where the ``.data`` section should be
1640 copied over. Must be aligned on a 16-byte boundary.
1641- ``__DATA_SIZE__`` Size of the ``.data`` section (in ROM or RAM).
1642- ``__BL1_RAM_START__`` Start address of BL1 read-write data.
1643- ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` End address of BL1 read-write data.
1644
1645How to choose the right base addresses for each bootloader stage image
1646~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1647
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001648There is currently no support for dynamic image loading in TF-A. This means
1649that all bootloader images need to be linked against their ultimate runtime
1650locations and the base addresses of each image must be chosen carefully such
1651that images don't overlap each other in an undesired way. As the code grows,
1652the base addresses might need adjustments to cope with the new memory layout.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001653
1654The memory layout is completely specific to the platform and so there is no
1655general recipe for choosing the right base addresses for each bootloader image.
1656However, there are tools to aid in understanding the memory layout. These are
1657the link map files: ``build/<platform>/<build-type>/bl<x>/bl<x>.map``, with ``<x>``
1658being the stage bootloader. They provide a detailed view of the memory usage of
1659each image. Among other useful information, they provide the end address of
1660each image.
1661
1662- ``bl1.map`` link map file provides ``__BL1_RAM_END__`` address.
1663- ``bl2.map`` link map file provides ``__BL2_END__`` address.
1664- ``bl31.map`` link map file provides ``__BL31_END__`` address.
1665- ``bl32.map`` link map file provides ``__BL32_END__`` address.
1666
1667For each bootloader image, the platform code must provide its start address
1668as well as a limit address that it must not overstep. The latter is used in the
1669linker scripts to check that the image doesn't grow past that address. If that
1670happens, the linker will issue a message similar to the following:
1671
1672::
1673
1674 aarch64-none-elf-ld: BLx has exceeded its limit.
1675
1676Additionally, if the platform memory layout implies some image overlaying like
1677on FVP, BL31 and TSP need to know the limit address that their PROGBITS
1678sections must not overstep. The platform code must provide those.
1679
Soby Mathew509af922018-09-27 16:46:41 +01001680TF-A does not provide any mechanism to verify at boot time that the memory
1681to load a new image is free to prevent overwriting a previously loaded image.
1682The platform must specify the memory available in the system for all the
1683relevant BL images to be loaded.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001684
1685For example, in the case of BL1 loading BL2, ``bl1_plat_sec_mem_layout()`` will
1686return the region defined by the platform where BL1 intends to load BL2. The
1687``load_image()`` function performs bounds check for the image size based on the
1688base and maximum image size provided by the platforms. Platforms must take
1689this behaviour into account when defining the base/size for each of the images.
1690
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001691Memory layout on Arm development platforms
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001692^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
1693
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001694The following list describes the memory layout on the Arm development platforms:
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001695
1696- A 4KB page of shared memory is used for communication between Trusted
1697 Firmware and the platform's power controller. This is located at the base of
1698 Trusted SRAM. The amount of Trusted SRAM available to load the bootloader
1699 images is reduced by the size of the shared memory.
1700
1701 The shared memory is used to store the CPUs' entrypoint mailbox. On Juno,
1702 this is also used for the MHU payload when passing messages to and from the
1703 SCP.
1704
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001705- Another 4 KB page is reserved for passing memory layout between BL1 and BL2
1706 and also the dynamic firmware configurations.
1707
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001708- On FVP, BL1 is originally sitting in the Trusted ROM at address ``0x0``. On
1709 Juno, BL1 resides in flash memory at address ``0x0BEC0000``. BL1 read-write
1710 data are relocated to the top of Trusted SRAM at runtime.
1711
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001712- BL2 is loaded below BL1 RW
1713
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001714- EL3 Runtime Software, BL31 for AArch64 and BL32 for AArch32 (e.g. SP_MIN),
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001715 is loaded at the top of the Trusted SRAM, such that its NOBITS sections will
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001716 overwrite BL1 R/W data and BL2. This implies that BL1 global variables
1717 remain valid only until execution reaches the EL3 Runtime Software entry
1718 point during a cold boot.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001719
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01001720- On Juno, SCP_BL2 is loaded temporarily into the EL3 Runtime Software memory
Paul Beesleybe653a62019-10-04 16:17:46 +00001721 region and transferred to the SCP before being overwritten by EL3 Runtime
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001722 Software.
1723
1724- BL32 (for AArch64) can be loaded in one of the following locations:
1725
1726 - Trusted SRAM
1727 - Trusted DRAM (FVP only)
1728 - Secure region of DRAM (top 16MB of DRAM configured by the TrustZone
1729 controller)
1730
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001731 When BL32 (for AArch64) is loaded into Trusted SRAM, it is loaded below
1732 BL31.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001733
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001734The location of the BL32 image will result in different memory maps. This is
1735illustrated for both FVP and Juno in the following diagrams, using the TSP as
1736an example.
1737
Paul Beesleye1c50262019-03-13 16:20:44 +00001738.. note::
1739 Loading the BL32 image in TZC secured DRAM doesn't change the memory
1740 layout of the other images in Trusted SRAM.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001741
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001742CONFIG section in memory layouts shown below contains:
1743
1744::
1745
1746 +--------------------+
1747 |bl2_mem_params_descs|
1748 |--------------------|
1749 | fw_configs |
1750 +--------------------+
1751
1752``bl2_mem_params_descs`` contains parameters passed from BL2 to next the
1753BL image during boot.
1754
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001755``fw_configs`` includes soc_fw_config, tos_fw_config, tb_fw_config and fw_config.
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001756
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001757**FVP with TSP in Trusted SRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001758(These diagrams only cover the AArch64 case)
1759
1760::
1761
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001762 DRAM
1763 0xffffffff +----------+
Manish V Badarkhea52c5252023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001764 | EL3 TZC |
1765 0xffe00000 |----------| (secure)
1766 | AP TZC |
1767 0xff000000 +----------+
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001768 : :
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001769 0x82100000 |----------|
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001770 |HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001771 0x82000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001772 | |
1773 0x80000000 +----------+
1774
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001775 Trusted DRAM
1776 0x08000000 +----------+
1777 |HW_CONFIG |
1778 0x07f00000 |----------|
1779 : :
1780 | |
1781 0x06000000 +----------+
1782
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001783 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001784 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1785 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1786 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1787 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001788 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1789 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001790 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1791 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001792 0x04003000 +----------+ +----------------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001793 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001794 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001795 | Shared |
1796 0x04000000 +----------+
1797
1798 Trusted ROM
1799 0x04000000 +----------+
1800 | BL1 (ro) |
1801 0x00000000 +----------+
1802
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001803**FVP with TSP in Trusted DRAM with firmware configs (default option):**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001804
1805::
1806
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001807 DRAM
1808 0xffffffff +--------------+
Manish V Badarkhea52c5252023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001809 | EL3 TZC |
1810 0xffe00000 |--------------| (secure)
1811 | AP TZC |
1812 0xff000000 +--------------+
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001813 : :
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001814 0x82100000 |--------------|
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001815 | HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001816 0x82000000 |--------------| (non-secure)
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001817 | |
1818 0x80000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001819
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001820 Trusted DRAM
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001821 0x08000000 +--------------+
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001822 | HW_CONFIG |
1823 0x07f00000 |--------------|
1824 : :
1825 | BL32 |
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001826 0x06000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001827
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001828 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001829 0x04040000 +--------------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1830 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1831 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1832 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001833 |--------------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1834 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001835 | | +----------------+
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001836 0x04003000 +--------------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001837 | CONFIG |
Soby Mathewb2a68f82018-02-16 14:52:52 +00001838 0x04001000 +--------------+
1839 | Shared |
1840 0x04000000 +--------------+
1841
1842 Trusted ROM
1843 0x04000000 +--------------+
1844 | BL1 (ro) |
1845 0x00000000 +--------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001846
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001847**FVP with TSP in TZC-Secured DRAM with firmware configs :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001848
1849::
1850
1851 DRAM
1852 0xffffffff +----------+
Manish V Badarkhea52c5252023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001853 | EL3 TZC |
1854 0xffe00000 |----------| (secure)
1855 | AP TZC |
1856 | (BL32) |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001857 0xff000000 +----------+
1858 | |
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001859 0x82100000 |----------|
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001860 |HW_CONFIG |
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001861 0x82000000 |----------| (non-secure)
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001862 | |
1863 0x80000000 +----------+
1864
Manish V Badarkheb4a87832022-04-12 21:11:56 +01001865 Trusted DRAM
1866 0x08000000 +----------+
1867 |HW_CONFIG |
1868 0x7f000000 |----------|
1869 : :
1870 | |
1871 0x06000000 +----------+
1872
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001873 Trusted SRAM
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001874 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1875 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1876 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1877 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001878 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1879 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001880 | | +----------------+
Manish V Badarkhe089fc622020-06-13 09:42:28 +01001881 0x04003000 +----------+
Sathees Balya5b8d50e2018-11-15 14:22:30 +00001882 | CONFIG |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001883 0x04001000 +----------+
1884 | Shared |
1885 0x04000000 +----------+
1886
1887 Trusted ROM
1888 0x04000000 +----------+
1889 | BL1 (ro) |
1890 0x00000000 +----------+
1891
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001892**Juno with BL32 in Trusted SRAM :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001893
1894::
1895
Manish V Badarkhea52c5252023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001896 DRAM
1897 0xFFFFFFFF +----------+
1898 | SCP TZC |
1899 0xFFE00000 |----------|
1900 | EL3 TZC |
1901 0xFFC00000 |----------| (secure)
1902 | AP TZC |
1903 0xFF000000 +----------+
1904 | |
1905 : : (non-secure)
1906 | |
1907 0x80000000 +----------+
1908
1909
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001910 Flash0
1911 0x0C000000 +----------+
1912 : :
1913 0x0BED0000 |----------|
1914 | BL1 (ro) |
1915 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
1916 : :
1917 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
1918 after SCP_BL2 has
1919 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001920 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1921 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1922 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1923 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001924 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1925 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Chris Kayddc93cb2020-03-12 13:50:26 +00001926 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001927 | | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL32 |
1928 | | +----------------+
1929 | |
1930 0x04001000 +----------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001931 | MHU |
1932 0x04000000 +----------+
1933
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001934**Juno with BL32 in TZC-secured DRAM :**
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001935
1936::
1937
1938 DRAM
Manish V Badarkhea52c5252023-03-07 10:21:30 +00001939 0xFFFFFFFF +----------+
1940 | SCP TZC |
1941 0xFFE00000 |----------|
1942 | EL3 TZC |
1943 0xFFC00000 |----------| (secure)
1944 | AP TZC |
1945 | (BL32) |
1946 0xFF000000 +----------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001947 | |
1948 : : (non-secure)
1949 | |
1950 0x80000000 +----------+
1951
1952 Flash0
1953 0x0C000000 +----------+
1954 : :
1955 0x0BED0000 |----------|
1956 | BL1 (ro) |
1957 0x0BEC0000 |----------|
1958 : :
1959 0x08000000 +----------+ BL31 is loaded
1960 after SCP_BL2 has
1961 Trusted SRAM been sent to SCP
Soby Mathew0f57fab2018-06-06 16:03:10 +01001962 0x04040000 +----------+ loaded by BL2 +----------------+
1963 | BL1 (rw) | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
1964 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 NOBITS |
1965 | BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | |
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001966 |----------| <<<<<<<<<<<<< |----------------|
1967 | SCP_BL2 | <<<<<<<<<<<<< | BL31 PROGBITS |
Chris Kayddc93cb2020-03-12 13:50:26 +00001968 | | +----------------+
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001969 0x04001000 +----------+
1970 | MHU |
1971 0x04000000 +----------+
1972
Paul Beesley43f35ef2019-05-29 13:59:40 +01001973.. _firmware_design_fip:
Sathees Balyae36950b2019-01-30 15:56:44 +00001974
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001975Firmware Image Package (FIP)
1976----------------------------
1977
1978Using a Firmware Image Package (FIP) allows for packing bootloader images (and
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00001979potentially other payloads) into a single archive that can be loaded by TF-A
1980from non-volatile platform storage. A driver to load images from a FIP has
1981been added to the storage layer and allows a package to be read from supported
1982platform storage. A tool to create Firmware Image Packages is also provided
1983and described below.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001984
1985Firmware Image Package layout
1986~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1987
1988The FIP layout consists of a table of contents (ToC) followed by payload data.
1989The ToC itself has a header followed by one or more table entries. The ToC is
Jett Zhou4069fb52017-11-24 16:03:58 +08001990terminated by an end marker entry, and since the size of the ToC is 0 bytes,
1991the offset equals the total size of the FIP file. All ToC entries describe some
1992payload data that has been appended to the end of the binary package. With the
1993information provided in the ToC entry the corresponding payload data can be
1994retrieved.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01001995
1996::
1997
1998 ------------------
1999 | ToC Header |
2000 |----------------|
2001 | ToC Entry 0 |
2002 |----------------|
2003 | ToC Entry 1 |
2004 |----------------|
2005 | ToC End Marker |
2006 |----------------|
2007 | |
2008 | Data 0 |
2009 | |
2010 |----------------|
2011 | |
2012 | Data 1 |
2013 | |
2014 ------------------
2015
2016The ToC header and entry formats are described in the header file
2017``include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h``. This file is used by both the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002018tool and TF-A.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002019
2020The ToC header has the following fields:
2021
2022::
2023
2024 `name`: The name of the ToC. This is currently used to validate the header.
2025 `serial_number`: A non-zero number provided by the creation tool
2026 `flags`: Flags associated with this data.
2027 Bits 0-31: Reserved
2028 Bits 32-47: Platform defined
2029 Bits 48-63: Reserved
2030
2031A ToC entry has the following fields:
2032
2033::
2034
2035 `uuid`: All files are referred to by a pre-defined Universally Unique
2036 IDentifier [UUID] . The UUIDs are defined in
2037 `include/tools_share/firmware_image_package.h`. The platform translates
2038 the requested image name into the corresponding UUID when accessing the
2039 package.
2040 `offset_address`: The offset address at which the corresponding payload data
2041 can be found. The offset is calculated from the ToC base address.
2042 `size`: The size of the corresponding payload data in bytes.
Etienne Carriered591d762017-08-23 15:43:33 +02002043 `flags`: Flags associated with this entry. None are yet defined.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002044
2045Firmware Image Package creation tool
2046~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2047
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002048The FIP creation tool can be used to pack specified images into a binary
2049package that can be loaded by TF-A from platform storage. The tool currently
2050only supports packing bootloader images. Additional image definitions can be
2051added to the tool as required.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002052
2053The tool can be found in ``tools/fiptool``.
2054
2055Loading from a Firmware Image Package (FIP)
2056~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2057
2058The Firmware Image Package (FIP) driver can load images from a binary package on
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002059non-volatile platform storage. For the Arm development platforms, this is
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002060currently NOR FLASH.
2061
2062Bootloader images are loaded according to the platform policy as specified by
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002063the function ``plat_get_image_source()``. For the Arm development platforms, this
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002064means the platform will attempt to load images from a Firmware Image Package
2065located at the start of NOR FLASH0.
2066
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002067The Arm development platforms' policy is to only allow loading of a known set of
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002068images. The platform policy can be modified to allow additional images.
2069
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002070Use of coherent memory in TF-A
2071------------------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002072
2073There might be loss of coherency when physical memory with mismatched
2074shareability, cacheability and memory attributes is accessed by multiple CPUs
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002075(refer to section B2.9 of `Arm ARM`_ for more details). This possibility occurs
2076in TF-A during power up/down sequences when coherency, MMU and caches are
2077turned on/off incrementally.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002078
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002079TF-A defines coherent memory as a region of memory with Device nGnRE attributes
2080in the translation tables. The translation granule size in TF-A is 4KB. This
2081is the smallest possible size of the coherent memory region.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002082
2083By default, all data structures which are susceptible to accesses with
2084mismatched attributes from various CPUs are allocated in a coherent memory
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002085region (refer to section 2.1 of :ref:`Porting Guide`). The coherent memory
2086region accesses are Outer Shareable, non-cacheable and they can be accessed with
2087the Device nGnRE attributes when the MMU is turned on. Hence, at the expense of
2088at least an extra page of memory, TF-A is able to work around coherency issues
2089due to mismatched memory attributes.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002090
2091The alternative to the above approach is to allocate the susceptible data
2092structures in Normal WriteBack WriteAllocate Inner shareable memory. This
2093approach requires the data structures to be designed so that it is possible to
2094work around the issue of mismatched memory attributes by performing software
2095cache maintenance on them.
2096
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002097Disabling the use of coherent memory in TF-A
2098~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002099
2100It might be desirable to avoid the cost of allocating coherent memory on
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002101platforms which are memory constrained. TF-A enables inclusion of coherent
2102memory in firmware images through the build flag ``USE_COHERENT_MEM``.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002103This flag is enabled by default. It can be disabled to choose the second
2104approach described above.
2105
2106The below sections analyze the data structures allocated in the coherent memory
2107region and the changes required to allocate them in normal memory.
2108
2109Coherent memory usage in PSCI implementation
2110~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2111
2112The ``psci_non_cpu_pd_nodes`` data structure stores the platform's power domain
2113tree information for state management of power domains. By default, this data
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002114structure is allocated in the coherent memory region in TF-A because it can be
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002115accessed by multiple CPUs, either with caches enabled or disabled.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002116
2117.. code:: c
2118
2119 typedef struct non_cpu_pwr_domain_node {
2120 /*
2121 * Index of the first CPU power domain node level 0 which has this node
2122 * as its parent.
2123 */
2124 unsigned int cpu_start_idx;
2125
2126 /*
2127 * Number of CPU power domains which are siblings of the domain indexed
2128 * by 'cpu_start_idx' i.e. all the domains in the range 'cpu_start_idx
2129 * -> cpu_start_idx + ncpus' have this node as their parent.
2130 */
2131 unsigned int ncpus;
2132
2133 /*
2134 * Index of the parent power domain node.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002135 */
2136 unsigned int parent_node;
2137
2138 plat_local_state_t local_state;
2139
2140 unsigned char level;
2141
2142 /* For indexing the psci_lock array*/
2143 unsigned char lock_index;
2144 } non_cpu_pd_node_t;
2145
2146In order to move this data structure to normal memory, the use of each of its
2147fields must be analyzed. Fields like ``cpu_start_idx``, ``ncpus``, ``parent_node``
2148``level`` and ``lock_index`` are only written once during cold boot. Hence removing
2149them from coherent memory involves only doing a clean and invalidate of the
2150cache lines after these fields are written.
2151
2152The field ``local_state`` can be concurrently accessed by multiple CPUs in
2153different cache states. A Lamport's Bakery lock ``psci_locks`` is used to ensure
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002154mutual exclusion to this field and a clean and invalidate is needed after it
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002155is written.
2156
2157Bakery lock data
2158~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2159
2160The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_lock_t`` is allocated in coherent memory
2161and is accessed by multiple CPUs with mismatched attributes. ``bakery_lock_t`` is
2162defined as follows:
2163
2164.. code:: c
2165
2166 typedef struct bakery_lock {
2167 /*
2168 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2169 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2170 * choosing its bakery number.
2171 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2172 */
2173 volatile uint16_t lock_data[BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS];
2174 } bakery_lock_t;
2175
2176It is a characteristic of Lamport's Bakery algorithm that the volatile per-CPU
2177fields can be read by all CPUs but only written to by the owning CPU.
2178
2179Depending upon the data cache line size, the per-CPU fields of the
2180``bakery_lock_t`` structure for multiple CPUs may exist on a single cache line.
2181These per-CPU fields can be read and written during lock contention by multiple
2182CPUs with mismatched memory attributes. Since these fields are a part of the
2183lock implementation, they do not have access to any other locking primitive to
2184safeguard against the resulting coherency issues. As a result, simple software
2185cache maintenance is not enough to allocate them in coherent memory. Consider
2186the following example.
2187
2188CPU0 updates its per-CPU field with data cache enabled. This write updates a
2189local cache line which contains a copy of the fields for other CPUs as well. Now
2190CPU1 updates its per-CPU field of the ``bakery_lock_t`` structure with data cache
2191disabled. CPU1 then issues a DCIVAC operation to invalidate any stale copies of
2192its field in any other cache line in the system. This operation will invalidate
2193the update made by CPU0 as well.
2194
2195To use bakery locks when ``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled, the lock data structure
2196has been redesigned. The changes utilise the characteristic of Lamport's Bakery
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002197algorithm mentioned earlier. The bakery_lock structure only allocates the memory
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002198for a single CPU. The macro ``DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`` allocates all the bakery locks
Chris Kayda043412023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002199needed for a CPU into a section ``.bakery_lock``. The linker allocates the memory
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002200for other cores by using the total size allocated for the bakery_lock section
2201and multiplying it with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). This enables software to
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002202perform software cache maintenance on the lock data structure without running
2203into coherency issues associated with mismatched attributes.
2204
2205The bakery lock data structure ``bakery_info_t`` is defined for use when
2206``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` is disabled as follows:
2207
2208.. code:: c
2209
2210 typedef struct bakery_info {
2211 /*
2212 * The lock_data is a bit-field of 2 members:
2213 * Bit[0] : choosing. This field is set when the CPU is
2214 * choosing its bakery number.
2215 * Bits[1 - 15] : number. This is the bakery number allocated.
2216 */
2217 volatile uint16_t lock_data;
2218 } bakery_info_t;
2219
2220The ``bakery_info_t`` represents a single per-CPU field of one lock and
2221the combination of corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` structures for all CPUs in the
2222system represents the complete bakery lock. The view in memory for a system
2223with n bakery locks are:
2224
2225::
2226
Chris Kayda043412023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002227 .bakery_lock section start
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002228 |----------------|
2229 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2230 | Lock_0 | for CPU0
2231 |----------------|
2232 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2233 | Lock_1 | for CPU0
2234 |----------------|
2235 | .... |
2236 |----------------|
2237 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2238 | Lock_N | for CPU0
2239 ------------------
2240 | XXXXX |
2241 | Padding to |
2242 | next Cache WB | <--- Calculate PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE, allocate
2243 | Granule | continuous memory for remaining CPUs.
2244 ------------------
2245 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_0 per-CPU field
2246 | Lock_0 | for CPU1
2247 |----------------|
2248 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_1 per-CPU field
2249 | Lock_1 | for CPU1
2250 |----------------|
2251 | .... |
2252 |----------------|
2253 | `bakery_info_t`| <-- Lock_N per-CPU field
2254 | Lock_N | for CPU1
2255 ------------------
2256 | XXXXX |
2257 | Padding to |
2258 | next Cache WB |
2259 | Granule |
2260 ------------------
2261
2262Consider a system of 2 CPUs with 'N' bakery locks as shown above. For an
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002263operation on Lock_N, the corresponding ``bakery_info_t`` in both CPU0 and CPU1
Chris Kayda043412023-02-14 11:30:04 +00002264``.bakery_lock`` section need to be fetched and appropriate cache operations need
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002265to be performed for each access.
2266
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002267On Arm Platforms, bakery locks are used in psci (``psci_locks``) and power controller
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002268driver (``arm_lock``).
2269
2270Non Functional Impact of removing coherent memory
2271~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2272
2273Removal of the coherent memory region leads to the additional software overhead
2274of performing cache maintenance for the affected data structures. However, since
2275the memory where the data structures are allocated is cacheable, the overhead is
2276mostly mitigated by an increase in performance.
2277
2278There is however a performance impact for bakery locks, due to:
2279
2280- Additional cache maintenance operations, and
2281- Multiple cache line reads for each lock operation, since the bakery locks
2282 for each CPU are distributed across different cache lines.
2283
2284The implementation has been optimized to minimize this additional overhead.
2285Measurements indicate that when bakery locks are allocated in Normal memory, the
2286minimum latency of acquiring a lock is on an average 3-4 micro seconds whereas
2287in Device memory the same is 2 micro seconds. The measurements were done on the
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002288Juno Arm development platform.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002289
2290As mentioned earlier, almost a page of memory can be saved by disabling
2291``USE_COHERENT_MEM``. Each platform needs to consider these trade-offs to decide
2292whether coherent memory should be used. If a platform disables
2293``USE_COHERENT_MEM`` and needs to use bakery locks in the porting layer, it can
2294optionally define macro ``PLAT_PERCPU_BAKERY_LOCK_SIZE`` (see the
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002295:ref:`Porting Guide`). Refer to the reference platform code for examples.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002296
2297Isolating code and read-only data on separate memory pages
2298----------------------------------------------------------
2299
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002300In the Armv8-A VMSA, translation table entries include fields that define the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002301properties of the target memory region, such as its access permissions. The
2302smallest unit of memory that can be addressed by a translation table entry is
2303a memory page. Therefore, if software needs to set different permissions on two
2304memory regions then it needs to map them using different memory pages.
2305
2306The default memory layout for each BL image is as follows:
2307
2308::
2309
2310 | ... |
2311 +-------------------+
2312 | Read-write data |
2313 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2314 | <Padding> |
2315 +-------------------+
2316 | Exception vectors |
2317 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2318 | <Padding> |
2319 +-------------------+
2320 | Read-only data |
2321 +-------------------+
2322 | Code |
2323 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2324
Paul Beesleye1c50262019-03-13 16:20:44 +00002325.. note::
2326 The 2KB alignment for the exception vectors is an architectural
2327 requirement.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002328
2329The read-write data start on a new memory page so that they can be mapped with
2330read-write permissions, whereas the code and read-only data below are configured
2331as read-only.
2332
2333However, the read-only data are not aligned on a page boundary. They are
2334contiguous to the code. Therefore, the end of the code section and the beginning
2335of the read-only data one might share a memory page. This forces both to be
2336mapped with the same memory attributes. As the code needs to be executable, this
2337means that the read-only data stored on the same memory page as the code are
2338executable as well. This could potentially be exploited as part of a security
2339attack.
2340
2341TF provides the build flag ``SEPARATE_CODE_AND_RODATA`` to isolate the code and
2342read-only data on separate memory pages. This in turn allows independent control
2343of the access permissions for the code and read-only data. In this case,
2344platform code gets a finer-grained view of the image layout and can
2345appropriately map the code region as executable and the read-only data as
2346execute-never.
2347
2348This has an impact on memory footprint, as padding bytes need to be introduced
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002349between the code and read-only data to ensure the segregation of the two. To
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002350limit the memory cost, this flag also changes the memory layout such that the
2351code and exception vectors are now contiguous, like so:
2352
2353::
2354
2355 | ... |
2356 +-------------------+
2357 | Read-write data |
2358 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2359 | <Padding> |
2360 +-------------------+
2361 | Read-only data |
2362 +-------------------+ Page boundary
2363 | <Padding> |
2364 +-------------------+
2365 | Exception vectors |
2366 +-------------------+ 2 KB boundary
2367 | <Padding> |
2368 +-------------------+
2369 | Code |
2370 +-------------------+ BLx_BASE
2371
2372With this more condensed memory layout, the separation of read-only data will
2373add zero or one page to the memory footprint of each BL image. Each platform
2374should consider the trade-off between memory footprint and security.
2375
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002376This build flag is disabled by default, minimising memory footprint. On Arm
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002377platforms, it is enabled.
2378
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002379Publish and Subscribe Framework
2380-------------------------------
2381
2382The Publish and Subscribe Framework allows EL3 components to define and publish
2383events, to which other EL3 components can subscribe.
2384
2385The following macros are provided by the framework:
2386
2387- ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(event)``: Defines an event, and takes one argument,
2388 the event name, which must be a valid C identifier. All calls to
2389 ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` macro must be placed in the file
2390 ``pubsub_events.h``.
2391
2392- ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG(event, arg)``: Publishes a defined event, by iterating
2393 subscribed handlers and calling them in turn. The handlers will be passed the
2394 parameter ``arg``. The expected use-case is to broadcast an event.
2395
2396- ``PUBLISH_EVENT(event)``: Like ``PUBLISH_EVENT_ARG``, except that the value
2397 ``NULL`` is passed to subscribed handlers.
2398
2399- ``SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(event, handler)``: Registers the ``handler`` to
2400 subscribe to ``event``. The handler will be executed whenever the ``event``
2401 is published.
2402
2403- ``for_each_subscriber(event, subscriber)``: Iterates through all handlers
2404 subscribed for ``event``. ``subscriber`` must be a local variable of type
2405 ``pubsub_cb_t *``, and will point to each subscribed handler in turn during
2406 iteration. This macro can be used for those patterns that none of the
2407 ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros cover.
2408
2409Publishing an event that wasn't defined using ``REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT`` will
2410result in build error. Subscribing to an undefined event however won't.
2411
2412Subscribed handlers must be of type ``pubsub_cb_t``, with following function
2413signature:
2414
Paul Beesley29c02522019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002415.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002416
2417 typedef void* (*pubsub_cb_t)(const void *arg);
2418
2419There may be arbitrary number of handlers registered to the same event. The
2420order in which subscribed handlers are notified when that event is published is
2421not defined. Subscribed handlers may be executed in any order; handlers should
2422not assume any relative ordering amongst them.
2423
2424Publishing an event on a PE will result in subscribed handlers executing on that
2425PE only; it won't cause handlers to execute on a different PE.
2426
2427Note that publishing an event on a PE blocks until all the subscribed handlers
2428finish executing on the PE.
2429
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002430TF-A generic code publishes and subscribes to some events within. Platform
2431ports are discouraged from subscribing to them. These events may be withdrawn,
2432renamed, or have their semantics altered in the future. Platforms may however
2433register, publish, and subscribe to platform-specific events.
Dimitris Papastamos17b4c0d2017-10-13 15:27:58 +01002434
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002435Publish and Subscribe Example
2436~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2437
2438A publisher that wants to publish event ``foo`` would:
2439
2440- Define the event ``foo`` in the ``pubsub_events.h``.
2441
Paul Beesley29c02522019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002442 .. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002443
2444 REGISTER_PUBSUB_EVENT(foo);
2445
2446- Depending on the nature of event, use one of ``PUBLISH_EVENT_*()`` macros to
2447 publish the event at the appropriate path and time of execution.
2448
2449A subscriber that wants to subscribe to event ``foo`` published above would
2450implement:
2451
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002452.. code:: c
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002453
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002454 void *foo_handler(const void *arg)
2455 {
2456 void *result;
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002457
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002458 /* Do handling ... */
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002459
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002460 return result;
2461 }
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002462
Sandrine Bailleux337e2f12019-02-08 10:50:28 +01002463 SUBSCRIBE_TO_EVENT(foo, foo_handler);
Jeenu Viswambharan8e743bc2017-09-22 08:32:10 +01002464
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002465
2466Reclaiming the BL31 initialization code
2467~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2468
2469A significant amount of the code used for the initialization of BL31 is never
2470needed again after boot time. In order to reduce the runtime memory
2471footprint, the memory used for this code can be reclaimed after initialization
2472has finished and be used for runtime data.
2473
2474The build option ``RECLAIM_INIT_CODE`` can be set to mark this boot time code
2475with a ``.text.init.*`` attribute which can be filtered and placed suitably
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002476within the BL image for later reclamation by the platform. The platform can
2477specify the filter and the memory region for this init section in BL31 via the
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002478plat.ld.S linker script. For example, on the FVP, this section is placed
2479overlapping the secondary CPU stacks so that after the cold boot is done, this
2480memory can be reclaimed for the stacks. The init memory section is initially
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002481mapped with ``RO``, ``EXECUTE`` attributes. After BL31 initialization has
Daniel Boulby1dcc28c2018-09-18 11:45:51 +01002482completed, the FVP changes the attributes of this section to ``RW``,
2483``EXECUTE_NEVER`` allowing it to be used for runtime data. The memory attributes
2484are changed within the ``bl31_plat_runtime_setup`` platform hook. The init
2485section section can be reclaimed for any data which is accessed after cold
2486boot initialization and it is upto the platform to make the decision.
2487
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002488.. _firmware_design_pmf:
2489
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002490Performance Measurement Framework
2491---------------------------------
2492
2493The Performance Measurement Framework (PMF) facilitates collection of
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002494timestamps by registered services and provides interfaces to retrieve them
2495from within TF-A. A platform can choose to expose appropriate SMCs to
2496retrieve these collected timestamps.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002497
2498By default, the global physical counter is used for the timestamp
2499value and is read via ``CNTPCT_EL0``. The framework allows to retrieve
2500timestamps captured by other CPUs.
2501
2502Timestamp identifier format
2503~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2504
2505A PMF timestamp is uniquely identified across the system via the
2506timestamp ID or ``tid``. The ``tid`` is composed as follows:
2507
2508::
2509
2510 Bits 0-7: The local timestamp identifier.
2511 Bits 8-9: Reserved.
2512 Bits 10-15: The service identifier.
2513 Bits 16-31: Reserved.
2514
2515#. The service identifier. Each PMF service is identified by a
2516 service name and a service identifier. Both the service name and
2517 identifier are unique within the system as a whole.
2518
2519#. The local timestamp identifier. This identifier is unique within a given
2520 service.
2521
2522Registering a PMF service
2523~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2524
2525To register a PMF service, the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` macro from ``pmf.h``
2526is used. The arguments required are the service name, the service ID,
2527the total number of local timestamps to be captured and a set of flags.
2528
2529The ``flags`` field can be specified as a bitwise-OR of the following values:
2530
2531::
2532
2533 PMF_STORE_ENABLE: The timestamp is stored in memory for later retrieval.
2534 PMF_DUMP_ENABLE: The timestamp is dumped on the serial console.
2535
2536The ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` reserves memory to store captured
2537timestamps in a PMF specific linker section at build time.
2538Additionally, it defines necessary functions to capture and
2539retrieve a particular timestamp for the given service at runtime.
2540
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002541The macro ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()`` only enables capturing PMF timestamps
2542from within TF-A. In order to retrieve timestamps from outside of TF-A, the
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002543``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE_SMC()`` macro must be used instead. This macro
2544accepts the same set of arguments as the ``PMF_REGISTER_SERVICE()``
2545macro but additionally supports retrieving timestamps using SMCs.
2546
2547Capturing a timestamp
2548~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2549
2550PMF timestamps are stored in a per-service timestamp region. On a
2551system with multiple CPUs, each timestamp is captured and stored
2552in a per-CPU cache line aligned memory region.
2553
2554Having registered the service, the ``PMF_CAPTURE_TIMESTAMP()`` macro can be
2555used to capture a timestamp at the location where it is used. The macro
2556takes the service name, a local timestamp identifier and a flag as arguments.
2557
2558The ``flags`` field argument can be zero, or ``PMF_CACHE_MAINT`` which
2559instructs PMF to do cache maintenance following the capture. Cache
2560maintenance is required if any of the service's timestamps are captured
2561with data cache disabled.
2562
2563To capture a timestamp in assembly code, the caller should use
2564``pmf_calc_timestamp_addr`` macro (defined in ``pmf_asm_macros.S``) to
2565calculate the address of where the timestamp would be stored. The
2566caller should then read ``CNTPCT_EL0`` register to obtain the timestamp
2567and store it at the determined address for later retrieval.
2568
2569Retrieving a timestamp
2570~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2571
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002572From within TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved using either
2573``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_MPIDR()`` or ``PMF_GET_TIMESTAMP_BY_INDEX()`` macros.
2574These macros accept the CPU's MPIDR value, or its ordinal position
2575respectively.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002576
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002577From outside TF-A, timestamps for individual CPUs can be retrieved by calling
2578into ``pmf_smc_handler()``.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002579
Paul Beesley29c02522019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002580::
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002581
2582 Interface : pmf_smc_handler()
2583 Argument : unsigned int smc_fid, u_register_t x1,
2584 u_register_t x2, u_register_t x3,
2585 u_register_t x4, void *cookie,
2586 void *handle, u_register_t flags
2587 Return : uintptr_t
2588
2589 smc_fid: Holds the SMC identifier which is either `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_32`
2590 when the caller of the SMC is running in AArch32 mode
2591 or `PMF_SMC_GET_TIMESTAMP_64` when the caller is running in AArch64 mode.
2592 x1: Timestamp identifier.
2593 x2: The `mpidr` of the CPU for which the timestamp has to be retrieved.
2594 This can be the `mpidr` of a different core to the one initiating
2595 the SMC. In that case, service specific cache maintenance may be
2596 required to ensure the updated copy of the timestamp is returned.
2597 x3: A flags value that is either 0 or `PMF_CACHE_MAINT`. If
2598 `PMF_CACHE_MAINT` is passed, then the PMF code will perform a
2599 cache invalidate before reading the timestamp. This ensures
2600 an updated copy is returned.
2601
2602The remaining arguments, ``x4``, ``cookie``, ``handle`` and ``flags`` are unused
2603in this implementation.
2604
2605PMF code structure
2606~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2607
2608#. ``pmf_main.c`` consists of core functions that implement service registration,
2609 initialization, storing, dumping and retrieving timestamps.
2610
2611#. ``pmf_smc.c`` contains the SMC handling for registered PMF services.
2612
2613#. ``pmf.h`` contains the public interface to Performance Measurement Framework.
2614
2615#. ``pmf_asm_macros.S`` consists of macros to facilitate capturing timestamps in
2616 assembly code.
2617
2618#. ``pmf_helpers.h`` is an internal header used by ``pmf.h``.
2619
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002620Armv8-A Architecture Extensions
2621-------------------------------
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002622
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002623TF-A makes use of Armv8-A Architecture Extensions where applicable. This
2624section lists the usage of Architecture Extensions, and build flags
2625controlling them.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002626
Manish Pandeybe6484c2023-05-12 14:51:39 +01002627Build options
2628~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002629
Manish Pandeybe6484c2023-05-12 14:51:39 +01002630``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR``
2631
2632These build options serve dual purpose
2633
2634- Determine the architecture extension support in TF-A build: All the mandatory
2635 architectural features up to ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR.ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` are included
2636 and unconditionally enabled by TF-A build system.
2637
2638- Passed to compiler via "-march" option to generate binary target : Tell the
2639 compiler to emit instructions upto ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR.ARM_ARCH_MINOR``
2640
2641The build system requires that the platform provides a valid numeric value based on
2642CPU architecture extension, otherwise it defaults to base Armv8.0-A architecture.
2643Subsequent Arm Architecture versions also support extensions which were introduced
2644in previous versions.
2645
2646**TO-DO** : Its planned to decouple the two functionalities and introduce a new macro
2647for compiler usage. The requirement for this decoupling arises becasue TF-A code
2648always provides support for the latest and greatest architecture features but this
2649is not the case for the target compiler.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002650
Paul Beesley43f35ef2019-05-29 13:59:40 +01002651.. seealso:: :ref:`Build Options`
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002652
2653For details on the Architecture Extension and available features, please refer
2654to the respective Architecture Extension Supplement.
2655
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002656Armv8.1-A
2657~~~~~~~~~
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002658
2659This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` >= 8, or when
2660``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 8 and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR`` >= 1.
2661
Soby Mathewc97cba42019-09-25 14:03:41 +01002662- By default, a load-/store-exclusive instruction pair is used to implement
2663 spinlocks. The ``USE_SPINLOCK_CAS`` build option when set to 1 selects the
2664 spinlock implementation using the ARMv8.1-LSE Compare and Swap instruction.
2665 Notice this instruction is only available in AArch64 execution state, so
2666 the option is only available to AArch64 builds.
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002667
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002668Armv8.2-A
2669~~~~~~~~~
Isla Mitchell9fce2722017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002670
Antonio Nino Diazd71446c2019-02-19 13:14:06 +00002671- The presence of ARMv8.2-TTCNP is detected at runtime. When it is present, the
2672 Common not Private (TTBRn_ELx.CnP) bit is enabled to indicate that multiple
Sandrine Bailleux7c0a8432018-01-29 14:48:15 +01002673 Processing Elements in the same Inner Shareable domain use the same
2674 translation table entries for a given stage of translation for a particular
2675 translation regime.
Isla Mitchell9fce2722017-08-07 11:20:13 +01002676
Jeenu Viswambharan3ff4aaa2018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002677Armv8.3-A
2678~~~~~~~~~
2679
Antonio Nino Diaz52839622019-01-31 11:58:00 +00002680- Pointer authentication features of Armv8.3-A are unconditionally enabled in
2681 the Non-secure world so that lower ELs are allowed to use them without
2682 causing a trap to EL3.
2683
2684 In order to enable the Secure world to use it, ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS``
2685 must be set to 1. This will add all pointer authentication system registers
2686 to the context that is saved when doing a world switch.
Jeenu Viswambharan3ff4aaa2018-08-15 14:29:29 +01002687
Alexei Fedorov06715f82019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002688 The TF-A itself has support for pointer authentication at runtime
Alexei Fedorov9fc59632019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002689 that can be enabled by setting ``BRANCH_PROTECTION`` option to non-zero and
Antonio Nino Diazb86048c2019-02-19 11:53:51 +00002690 ``CTX_INCLUDE_PAUTH_REGS`` to 1. This enables pointer authentication in BL1,
2691 BL2, BL31, and the TSP if it is used.
2692
Alexei Fedorov06715f82019-03-13 11:05:07 +00002693 Note that Pointer Authentication is enabled for Non-secure world irrespective
2694 of the value of these build flags if the CPU supports it.
2695
Alexei Fedorovfa6f7742019-03-11 16:51:47 +00002696 If ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR == 8`` and ``ARM_ARCH_MINOR >= 3`` the code footprint of
2697 enabling PAuth is lower because the compiler will use the optimized
2698 PAuth instructions rather than the backwards-compatible ones.
2699
Alexei Fedorov9fc59632019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002700Armv8.5-A
2701~~~~~~~~~
2702
2703- Branch Target Identification feature is selected by ``BRANCH_PROTECTION``
Manish Pandey700e7682021-10-21 21:53:49 +01002704 option set to 1. This option defaults to 0.
Justin Chadwell88d493f2019-07-18 16:16:32 +01002705
2706- Memory Tagging Extension feature is unconditionally enabled for both worlds
2707 (at EL0 and S-EL0) if it is only supported at EL0. If instead it is
2708 implemented at all ELs, it is unconditionally enabled for only the normal
2709 world. To enable it for the secure world as well, the build option
2710 ``CTX_INCLUDE_MTE_REGS`` is required. If the hardware does not implement
2711 MTE support at all, it is always disabled, no matter what build options
2712 are used.
Alexei Fedorov9fc59632019-05-24 12:17:09 +01002713
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002714Armv7-A
2715~~~~~~~
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002716
2717This Architecture Extension is targeted when ``ARM_ARCH_MAJOR`` == 7.
2718
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002719There are several Armv7-A extensions available. Obviously the TrustZone
2720extension is mandatory to support the TF-A bootloader and runtime services.
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002721
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002722Platform implementing an Armv7-A system can to define from its target
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002723Cortex-A architecture through ``ARM_CORTEX_A<X> = yes`` in their
Paul Beesley8aabea32019-01-11 18:26:51 +00002724``platform.mk`` script. For example ``ARM_CORTEX_A15=yes`` for a
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002725Cortex-A15 target.
2726
2727Platform can also set ``ARM_WITH_NEON=yes`` to enable neon support.
Paul Beesleybe653a62019-10-04 16:17:46 +00002728Note that using neon at runtime has constraints on non secure world context.
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002729TF-A does not yet provide VFP context management.
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002730
2731Directive ``ARM_CORTEX_A<x>`` and ``ARM_WITH_NEON`` are used to set
2732the toolchain target architecture directive.
2733
2734Platform may choose to not define straight the toolchain target architecture
2735directive by defining ``MARCH32_DIRECTIVE``.
2736I.e:
2737
Paul Beesley29c02522019-03-13 15:11:04 +00002738.. code:: make
Etienne Carriere26e63c42017-11-08 13:48:40 +01002739
2740 MARCH32_DIRECTIVE := -mach=armv7-a
2741
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002742Code Structure
2743--------------
2744
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002745TF-A code is logically divided between the three boot loader stages mentioned
2746in the previous sections. The code is also divided into the following
2747categories (present as directories in the source code):
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002748
2749- **Platform specific.** Choice of architecture specific code depends upon
2750 the platform.
2751- **Common code.** This is platform and architecture agnostic code.
2752- **Library code.** This code comprises of functionality commonly used by all
2753 other code. The PSCI implementation and other EL3 runtime frameworks reside
2754 as Library components.
2755- **Stage specific.** Code specific to a boot stage.
2756- **Drivers.**
2757- **Services.** EL3 runtime services (eg: SPD). Specific SPD services
2758 reside in the ``services/spd`` directory (e.g. ``services/spd/tspd``).
2759
2760Each boot loader stage uses code from one or more of the above mentioned
2761categories. Based upon the above, the code layout looks like this:
2762
2763::
2764
2765 Directory Used by BL1? Used by BL2? Used by BL31?
2766 bl1 Yes No No
2767 bl2 No Yes No
2768 bl31 No No Yes
2769 plat Yes Yes Yes
2770 drivers Yes No Yes
2771 common Yes Yes Yes
2772 lib Yes Yes Yes
2773 services No No Yes
2774
Sandrine Bailleuxf3cacad2019-02-08 15:26:36 +01002775The build system provides a non configurable build option IMAGE_BLx for each
2776boot loader stage (where x = BL stage). e.g. for BL1 , IMAGE_BL1 will be
Dan Handley4def07d2018-03-01 18:44:00 +00002777defined by the build system. This enables TF-A to compile certain code only
2778for specific boot loader stages
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002779
2780All assembler files have the ``.S`` extension. The linker source files for each
2781boot stage have the extension ``.ld.S``. These are processed by GCC to create the
2782linker scripts which have the extension ``.ld``.
2783
2784FDTs provide a description of the hardware platform and are used by the Linux
2785kernel at boot time. These can be found in the ``fdts`` directory.
2786
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002787.. rubric:: References
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002788
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002789- `Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D)`_
2790
2791- `Power State Coordination Interface PDD`_
2792
Sandrine Bailleux71ac9312020-04-17 14:06:52 +02002793- `SMC Calling Convention`_
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002794
2795- :ref:`Interrupt Management Framework`
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002796
2797--------------
2798
Arvind Ram Prakash42d4d3b2022-11-22 14:41:00 -06002799*Copyright (c) 2013-2023, Arm Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.*
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002800
Paul Beesley34760952019-04-12 14:19:42 +01002801.. _Power State Coordination Interface PDD: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
laurenw-arm3ba55a32020-04-16 10:02:17 -05002802.. _SMCCC: https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0028/latest
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002803.. _PSCI: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
2804.. _Power State Coordination Interface PDD: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0022d/Power_State_Coordination_Interface_PDD_v1_1_DEN0022D.pdf
Petre-Ionut Tudor62c9be72019-09-27 15:13:21 +01002805.. _Arm ARM: https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0487/latest
laurenw-arm3ba55a32020-04-16 10:02:17 -05002806.. _SMC Calling Convention: https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0028/latest
Sandrine Bailleuxc1491eb2019-04-24 10:41:24 +02002807.. _Trusted Board Boot Requirements CLIENT (TBBR-CLIENT) Armv8-A (ARM DEN0006D): https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0006/latest/trusted-board-boot-requirements-client-tbbr-client-armv8-a
Zelalem Aweke7446c262021-10-21 13:59:45 -05002808.. _Arm Confidential Compute Architecture (Arm CCA): https://www.arm.com/why-arm/architecture/security-features/arm-confidential-compute-architecture
Douglas Raillard6f625742017-06-28 15:23:03 +01002809
Paul Beesleya2c320a2019-03-13 15:49:27 +00002810.. |Image 1| image:: ../resources/diagrams/rt-svc-descs-layout.png